Jharkhand Court February 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Raj Kumar Singh Vs. Rajendra Singh and ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Feb-05-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI. F.A. No. 93 of 2012 Raj Kumar Singh Appellant -V e r s u s- Rajendra Singh & Others Respondents. CORAM: - HONBLE MR. JUSTICE P.P. BHATT. For the Appellant : - M/s. A. Aditya and D. Sen, Advocates. 03/05.02.2013 The present first appeal is preferred under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, being aggrieved and dissatisfied with the judgment dated 09.02.2012, delivered by the learned Civil Judge (Senior Division-Vth), Dhanbad in Title Suit No. 199 of 2007. Heard the learned counsel for the appellant. Perused the papers. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the matter, the issue/point involved in the matter requires consideration. Hence, this appeal, being a first appeal is admitted for hearing. Issue notice to the Respondents both by Registered Post with A/D as well as by ordinary process for which requisites etc. must be filed within one week. (P.P. Bhatt, J.) APK...
Hikim Chandra Mahto Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Feb-05-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI ---- W.P. (PIL) No. 3209 of 2010 ---- Hikim Chandra Mahto ....... Petitioner Vs. The State of Jharkhand &Ors. Respondents ------ CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ALOK SINGH ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. A.K. Sahani For the Respondents: J.C to A.G Order No. 08 ------ Dated 05th February, 2013 The respondent-State is directed to give up-to-date position of all the issues which include the stage of acquisition of the land as well as with respect to the step taken by about 20 Rehabilitation Officers for rehabilitating the families as the State has stated at page 9 of the counter affidavit that by August, 2010 altogether 20 Rehabilitation Officers have been deputed to complete the balance rehabilitation work. With regard to the rest of works, which are yet to be completed, the State may state whether they have taken step or not. The State may also state that if there is no sufficient water then for what reason the decision was ta...
Rajesh Kishore Jha Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Feb-05-2013
In the High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi Cr.M.P. No.2064 of 2012 Rajesh Kumar Jha.................... ......................Petitioner VERSUS State of Jharkhand and another........Opposite Parties CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.R.PRASAD For the Petitioner :Mr. V.K.Tiwary For the State :A.P.P 5.5.2.13. Let the informant be impleaded as opposite party no.2. On impleadment, let notice be issued to the newly added opposite party no.2 under registered cover with A/D, for which requisites must be filed within a week. At the same time, petitioner would be at liberty to take step for personal service of notice upon the opposite party no.2. On appearance of opposite party no.2 or on filing affidavit regarding service of notice, let this matter be listed for admission. Till then, further proceeding in Ranchi Sadar SC/ST P.S case no.21 of 2009, corresponding to G.R. No.1848 of 2009, pending in the court of Additional Judicial Commissioner, Ranchi shall remain stayed so far the petitioner is concer...
Ramchandra Paswan Alias Ram Chandra Ram and Others Vs. the State of Jh ...
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Feb-05-2013
INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI B.A.No.649of2013 RamchandraPaswan@RamChandraRam&Ors. .... .... . Petitioners Versus TheStateofJharkhand .... .... .... Opp.Party CORAM:HON'BLEMRS.JUSTICEJAYAROY ForthePetitioner :Mr.AbhayKumarChaturvdei,Advocate FortheOpp.Party :A.P.P. 02/05.02.2013 Counsel for the petitioners is permitted to add the complainantasoppositepartyno.2inthiscase. Issuenoticetotheoppositepartyno.2byregisteredpost withA/Daswellasbyordinarypost,forwhichrequisiteetc.mustbe filedby8th February,2013,failingwhichthisapplicationshallstand rejectedwithoutfurtherreferencetotheBench. Put upthiscase under the heading For Orders on 12th March,2013. (JayaRoy,J.) Anit...
ZaharuddIn Ansari Alias ZahiruddIn Ansari Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Feb-05-2013
INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI B.A.No.226of2013 ZaharuddinAnsari@ZahiruddinAnsari Petitioner Versus TheStateofJharkhand OppositeParty CORAM: HONBLEMR.JUSTICED.N.UPADHYAY ForthePetitioner :Mr.S.P .Roy,Advocate FortheState :APP 02/05.02.2013 Heardlearnedcounselfortheparties. ThepetitionerisaccusedinacaseregisteredunderSections467, 468,471,472and414/34oftheIndianPenalCode. ItisallegedintheF.I.R.thatoneAlimulAnsari@AlimulRahman hadsoldamotorcycletotheinformantforRs.22,000/. Atthe timeofsale proceeds,thepetitionerwasalsopresentwithhim. ItissubmittedthatthesaidAlimulAnsarihasbeengrantedbailby abenchofthisCourtvideB.A.No.6972of2011dated12.10.2011 Learnedcounsel,appearing for the State opposedthe prayerfor bail. Consideringthefactthatoneofthecoaccusedhasbeengranted bail,abovenamedpetitionerisdirectedtobereleasedonbailonfurnishingbail bondofRs.10,000/(RupeesTenThousand)withtwosuretiesofthelikeamount each to the satisfaction of the Court of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Dumka ...
Niraj Kumar Agarwal Vs. the State of Jharkhand and anr
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Feb-05-2013
In the High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi Cr.M.P. No.2592 of 2012 Niraj Kumar Agarwal................... ......................Petitioner VERSUS State of Jharkhand and another........Opposite Parties CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.R.PRASAD For the Petitioner :Mr. Nilesh Kumar For the State :A.P.P 3.5.2.13. As prayed for, let this matter be listed along with Cr.M.P.No.2464 of 2012 so that counter affidavit be filed on behalf of the State. Until further order, no coercive action shall be taken against the petitioner in Senha P.S. Case no.43 of 2012, corresponding to G.R. No.318 of 2012, pending in the court of Sub-divisional Judicial Magistrate, Lohardaga. (R.R.Prasad, J.) ND/...
Smt Rekha Singh Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Feb-05-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND, RANCHI Cr. M. P. No. 1646 of 2012 Smt. Rekha Singh ..... Petitioner(s) Versus 1.The State of Jharkhand 2.Jaishankar . Opp. Party(s) CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE R. R. PRASAD For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Atanu Banerjee, Advocate. For the State : Mr. Manoj Kumar No.4, A.P.P. For the O.P. No.2 : Mr.Jai Prakash, Sr. Advocate. ----- 03 /05.02.2013. Mr. Atanu Banerjee, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that since the counter-affidavit has been filed, wherein certain documents have been annexed, he needs to take instructions from his client and, therefore, the matter be adjourned. Upon it, Mr. Jai Prakash, learned Senior Counsel appearing for the opposite party No.2 submits that he will not be placing reliance over the documents which have been filed along with the counter-affidavit. As prayed for, list this case on 12.02.2013. Till then, interim order passed on 29.10.2012 shall continue. (R. R. Prasad, J.) Sandeep/...
Dukhu Mahli Vs. State of Jharkhand and anr
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Feb-05-2013
In the High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi Cr.M.P. No.1285 of 2011 Dukhu Mahli ..................... ......................Petitioner VERSUS State of Jharkhand and another........Opposite Parties CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.R.PRASAD For the Petitioner :Mr. Arun Kumar Pandey For the State :A.P.P 2.5.2.13. Regard being had to the allegation made in the F.I.R, no case of quashing of the F.I.R is made out. Accordingly, this application stands dismissed. (R.R.Prasad, J.) ND/...
Mahesh Prasad Sahu Vs. Ram Bilash Sahu and ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Feb-05-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI. I.A. No. 240 of 2013 in F.A. No. 171 of 2009 Mahesh Prasad Sahu Appellant -V e r s u s- Ram Bilas Sahu & Others Respondents. CORAM: - HONBLE MR. JUSTICE P.P. BHATT. For the Appellant : - Mr. V. K. Prasad, Advocate. For the Respondent nos. 1 to 4 : - M/s. A. Pandey and A.K. Ojha, Advocates. I.A. No. 240 of 2013 ... 08/05.02.2013 Learned counsel, Mr. Pranay Kumar Sinha undertakes to file 'Vakalatnama' on behalf of the party-Respondent No. 6 in the matter within a week's time. Put up this case after two weeks. In the meantime, the learned counsel appearing for the party-Respondent No. 6 shall file counter affidavit, if any. The parties shall maintain status quo, as on today, for a period of two weeks. (P.P. Bhatt, J.) APK...
Court on Its Own Motion Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Feb-05-2013
INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI W.P.(PIL)No.1783of2011 CourtonitsOwnMotion ......Petitioner Versus StateofJharkhandandors. .......Respondents CORAM:HONBLETHECHIEFJUSTICE HONBLEMR.JUSTICEALOKSINGH .... Fortheapplicant (inI.A.No.500of2013) :Mr.MaheshTiwari,Adv. FortheRespondents :Mr.R.R.Mishra,G.P.II. Mr.RajivRanjan,Adv. Mr.A.K.Mehta,Adv. Mr.M.Khan,ASGI Orderno.37 Dated5 th February,2013 1. Learned counsel appearing for the respondentSAIL/BSL wantstofilereplyofI.A.No.500of2013.2. Post this matter on 20th February,2013, by which date the concernedrespondentmayfilereplytoI.A.No.500of2013.3. CounselfortheCBIhassubmittedonlyonecopyofthereport, whichisnotaccepted.Twocopiesofthereportbesubmittedon20th February,2013.Thereportisreturnedback. (PrakashTatia,C.J.) (AlokSingh,J) G.Jha/...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »