Jharkhand Court January 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Shivanand Yadav Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jan-10-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI. A.B.A.No. 3407 of 2012 ----- 1. Shivanand Yadav 2. Ramanand Yadav Petitioners. Versus State of Jharkhand and another Opp.parties . ------ Coram : The Hon'ble Mr. Justice Prashant Kumar. ----- For the Petitioners : Sri. Pratiush Lala For the State : Sri. S.P.Jha, APP ----- 07/10.01. 2013. Anticipatory bail petition filed by Shivanand Yadav and Ramanand Yadav, in connection with C.P.Case No. 1241 of 2005 pending in the court of Judicial Magistrate, Dhanbad, is moved by Sri Pratiush Lala, learned counsel for the petitioners and opposed by Sri S.P.Jha, A.P.P. for the State. This complaint case was lodged in the year 2005. It further appears that petitioner was declared absconder. Under the said circumstance, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on anticipatory bail. Accordingly, prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners is rejected. ( Prashant Kumar,J.) Raman/Tanuj...
Safi Khan Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jan-10-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A. B.A. No. 2484 of 2012 Safi Khan .........Petitioner Vs. The State of Jharkhand & Anr ........Opposite parties CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR For the Petitioner: Mr. Mahesh Tewari For the State: Mr. K.K. Mishra ,APP 13/10.01.2013: As prayed for put up this case in the next week on the top of the list. In the meantime, the interim order dated 19.09.2012 shall continue. ( Prashant Kumar,J.) Sharda/-...
M/S Jagdhary Civil Constructio Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jan-10-2013
INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI W.P.(C)No.231of2012 JagdhatryCivilConstructionPrivateLimitedthrough itsoneoftheDirectors,Gumla ... Petitioner Versus TheStateofJharkhandthroughitsChiefSecretary, Ranchi&Ors. ... ... ... Respondents CORAM: HONBLEMR.JUSTICEALOKSINGH ForthePetitioner :None FortheState :06. 10.01.2013 Noneforthepetitioner.Nonewaspresentforthepetitioneronthelast datei.e.09.05.2012. Accordingly,presentpetitionisdismissedfornonprosecution. (AlokSingh,J.) Manish...
Malti Dey Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jan-10-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W. P. (C) No. 6137 of 2007 Malti Dey ..Petitioner -Versus- The State of Jharkhand & others..Respondents. --- CORAM : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE APARESH KUMAR SINGH --- For the Petitioner : None. For the Respondents : J.C. to A.G. -- 06/10.1.2013 No one appeared onbehalfofthe petitioner earlieron 9th October,2012andthecasewasadjourned.Thereafteragainon6th December, 2012 no one appeared on behalf of the petitioner and againthematterwasadjourned. The respondents through their supplementary counter affidavithavestatedthatasumofRs.5Lakhshasbeenpaidas compensationtothepetitioneronaccountofdeathofherhusbandas allegedbyherandreceiptofsuchpaymenthasalsobeenannexedas AnnexureDSeriesdated10thAugust,2010tothesupplementary counteraffidavit.Norejoindertothesaidaffidavithasbeenfiled. It appears that the grievances of the petitioner have been redressedand,therefore,sheisnotinterestedinpursuingthematter. Accordingly,thiswritpetitionisdisposedofasinfructuous. (Aparesh Ku...
Rajesh Chouhan Alias Rajesh Prasad Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jan-10-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A. B.A. No. 3100 of 2012 Rajesh Chouhan @ Rajesh Prasad.........Petitioner Vs. The State of Jharkhand ........Opposite party CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR For the Petitioner: Mrs. Amita Srivastava For the State: Mr. Prem Prakash ,APP 5/10.01.2013: Anticipatory bail application filed by petitioner Rajesh Chouhan @ Rajesh Prasad in connection with Putki P.S. Case No. 77 of 2012 ( G.R. No. 1552 of 2012) pending in the court of learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Dhanbad is moved by Mrs. Amita Srivastava and opposed by Sri Prem Prakash, learned Additional P.P. It appears that there is free fighting between two parties i.e. member of JVM and members of AJSU and during the said fighting, two persons died one each from both side. In the said fighting bombs and other explosives used. Petitioner was leading one of the party i.e. JVM. It also appears from para 44 of the case diary that the petitioner has criminal antecedent. Under the said...
Jitendra Prasad Singh Vs. S a I L
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jan-10-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W. P. (C) No. 5341 of 2012 --- Jitendra Prasad Singh Petitioner Versus Bokaro Steel Plant (SAIL), Bokaro & others Respondents --- CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH --- For the Petitioner : Mr. Sanjay Prasad, Advocate For the SAIL : Mr. Prashant Kumar Singh, Advocate --- 2/10.01.2013 Learned counsel appearing for the respondents submits that in fact annexure no. 2 is the notice and petitioner can reply this notice in writing on which an appropriate decision may be taken. Mr. Sanjay Prasad, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this petition with liberty to issue reply to annexure no. 2 within two weeks from today. Order accordingly. (Alok Singh, J.) R.ShekharCp2...
Sanjeev Kumar Bhattacharya Vs. Union of India and ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jan-10-2013
INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI W.P.(C)No.776of2012 SanjeevKumarBhattacharya ... Petitioner Versus 1.UnionofIndiathroughthesecretary, RailBhawan,NewDelhi 2.TheDirector,(TourismandCatering), RailwayBoard,NewDelhi 3.Sr.DivisionalRailwayManager,SouthEasternRailway, DRMOffice,Ranchi 4.TheDivisionalRailwayManager,SouthEasternRailway, DRMOffice,Ranchi 5.TheChiefcommercialManager,SouthEasternRailway, DRMOffice,Ranchi 6.Sr.DivisionalTrafficManager,SouthEasternRailway, DRMOffice,Ranchi 7.Sr.DivisionalCommercialManager,SouthEasternRailway, DRMOffice,Ranchi ... ... ... Respondents CORAM: HONBLEMR.JUSTICEALOKSINGH ForthePetitioner :Mr.SatishKumarKeshri,Advocate FortheRailways :Mr.SudhirKumar,Advocate 06/10.01.2013 Undisputedly,TeaVendorLicenceinfavouroffatherofthepetitioner wasextendedtillOctober,2008.Undisputedly,fatherofthepetitioner has expiredinthemonthofSeptember,2008.Petitionerhasmovedanapplication toissueTeaVendorLicencetothepetitioner,whichwasrejected. ThecaseofRailwayisthatTeaVendorLice...
M/S Ekta Enterprises Vs. Allahabad Bank
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jan-10-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(C) No. 4232 of 2011. --- M/S Ekta Enterprises through its Partner Abdul Jabbar Ansari ... ... ... ... ... Petitioner Versus Allahabad Bank through its authorised Officer, Branch Katrasgarh, Dhanbad ... ... ... ... ... Respondent --- CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH --- For the Petitioner : Mr. Ramawatar Chamaria, Advocate. For the Respondent : Mr. K.P. Choudhary and Mrs. A.R. Choudhary, Advocate. --- 03. 10.01.2013. Mr. Ramawater Chamaria, learned counsel for the petitioner, seeks permission to withdraw this writ petition with liberty to approach appropriate forum. This writ petition is permitted to be withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. (Alok Singh, J.) AKS.Cp.2....
Dewan Mohali Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jan-10-2013
INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI W.P.(S)No.5376of2009 DewanMohali. .Petitioner. Versus TheStateofJharkhand&Ors. ....Respondents. CORAM:HONBLEMR.JUSTICENARENDRANATHTIWARI ForthePetitioner : Mr.RajivRanjan,Advocate. FortheState : J.C.toA.G. 07/10.01.2013: Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner seekspermissiontowithdrawthiswritpetition. Respondentshavenoobjection. Permissionisaccorded. Accordingly,thiswritpetitionisdismissedaswithdrawn. (NarendraNathTiwari,J.) I.A.No.253of2010: Learned counsel for the petitioner does not press this interlocutoryapplication. Accordingly,I.A.No.253of2010isrejectedasnotpressed. (NarendraNathTiwari,J.) Sanjay/...
Punam Mishra Vs. Collectariate
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jan-10-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(C) No. 7743 of 2012 Punam Mishra ..... Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. The Deputy Commissioner, Bokaro . Respondents CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH For the Petitioner : M/s. Rahul Kr., V.K. Gupta, Advocates For the Respondents : Mr. Md. Shamim Akhtar, S.C. (Mines) ----- 2 /10.01.2013 Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has moved an application (Annexure3) for obtaining no objection certificate to install and run the petrol pump, and thereafter, has moved a representation (Annexure5) on 10.12.2012 before the Deputy Commissioner, Bokaro, however, no decision has been taken so far. Learned counsel for the Respondents submits that an appropriate decision shall be taken on the application (Annexure3) as well as on the representation (Annexure5) by the Deputy Commissioner, Bokaro, in accordance with law, preferably within thirty days and the decision so taken shall be communicated forthwith to the p...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- Next ›