Jharkhand Court September 2012 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Bijay Prasad Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-17-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 2006 of 2012 Bijay Prasad ... ... Petitioner -V e r s u s - The State of Jharkhand ... ... Opposite Party CORAM: - HONBLE MR. JUSTICE D. N. UPADHYAY For the Petitioner : Mr. Nilesh Kumar, Advocate. For the State: : APP. 17.09.2012 Heard learned counsel for the parties. The petitioner is accused in connection with Kotwali P.S. Case No. 352/2012 [G.R. No. 1797/2012], registered under Sections 467, 468, 470, 471, 419, 420, 120B of the Indian Penal Code. It reveals from the F.I.R. that after receiving secret information, the Police raided photocopy shop situated near Civil Court campus, Ranchi and fake seals, Identity Card, Election Identitiy Card, Income Tax Cards, Driving Licence, Birth Certificate, R.C. Book, computer set, fitness certificate, caste certificate, some other fitness certificates etc. were recovered from there. Petitioner is the owner of alleged shop. It is submitted that the petitioner was not present in his shop on the ...
M/S G.S.Malhotra Vs. Damodar Valley Corporation Thr
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-17-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(C) No. 3907 of 2008 M/s G. S. Malhotra Petitioner -V e r s u s- DVC through its Chairman and Others Respondents. CORAM: - HONBLE MR. JUSTICE APARESH KUMAR SINGH. For the Petitioner : - Mr. D. K. Chakraverty, Adv. For the Respondents : - M/s S. Choudhary & Rakesh Kr. Sahi 06/17.09.2012 Heard learned counsel for the parties. The petitioner has approached this Court directing the respondents to pay the admitted dues to Rs. 7,50,000/- in respect of the work of construction of settling pond for drain no. 1, 2 and 3 at Chandrapura Thermal Power Station vide agreement no. CT/ACD/T-3/10 of 2004-05, which, according to the petitioner, has been completed on 30.05.2006. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that a contract had taken place between the petitioner and respondents and in spite of his representation, the payment of contractual dues, which are admissible, has not been paid to the petitioner. On the other hand, learned counsel for the r...
Pawan Kejriwal and ors Vs. State of Jharkhand and anr
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-17-2012
In the High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi Cr. M. P. No.54 of 2012 with Cr.M.P.No.694 of 2011 with Cr.M.P.No.815 of 2011 with Cr.M.P.No.1272 of 2011 Pawan Kejriwal and others...Petitioners (Cr.M.P.54 of 2012) Jitendra Kumar.....................Petitioner (Cr.M.P.694 of 2011) Prabhat Kumar Pandey.......Petitioner (Cr.M.P.815 of 2011) Ashok Kejriwal.................. Petitioner (Cr.M.P.1272 of 2011) VERSUS State of Jharkhand. ...................Opposite Party CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE R.R.PRASAD For the Petitioners : Mr.Indrajit Sinha For the State :A.P.P 8.17.9.12. As prayed for, let all the four matters be listed for admission on 24.9.2012. Till then, interim order passed in respective cases shall continue. (R.R.Prasad, J.) ND/...
Ashok Kumar Sinha Vs. Union of India and ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-17-2012
INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI W.P.(C)No.3636of2007 AshokKumarSinha ...Petitioner Versus TheUnionofIndia&others ...Respondents CORAM:HONBLEMR.JUSTICEAPARESHKUMARSINGH ForthePetitioner :Mr.D.K.Chakraverty,Adv. FortheRespondents:Mr.P.P.N.Roy,Sr.Adv. 04/17.09.2012 Learnedcounselfortherespondentsseekssometimetoproduce therecordasdirectedbytheorderdated06.08.2008. Listthiscaseaftertwoweeks. Tillthen,theinterimorderdated14.07.2008shallcontinue. (ApareshKumarSingh,J) jk...
Md.Abid HussaIn Ansari and ors. Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-17-2012
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. Revision No.262 o1. Md. Abid Hussain Ansari 2. Md. Mujibur Rab @ Munna ..... Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand . Opposite Party CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H.C. MISHRA For the Petitioners : Mr. Praveer Chatterjee, Advocate For the State : A. P.P. ----- /17.9.2012 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State.2. The petitioners are aggrieved by order dated 16.5.2002, passed by the learned 5th Additional Sessions Judge, Dhanbad, in S.T. No.249 of 1999, whereby the application filed by the petitioners for discharge, was rejected by the learned Court below, finding that there are ample prima facie evidence for framing charge against the petitioners under sections 4 / 5 of the Explosive Substance Act and 9B of the Explosives Act, as also under Section 414 of the I.P.C.3. Petitioners have been made accused in Chirkunda (Maithan) P.S. Case No.157 of 1998, corresponding to G.R. No.2015 of 1998, for the offences ...
Bimal Topno Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-17-2012
INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI A.B.A.No.3319of2012 BimalTopno. ... ... ... ... ... ...Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand. ... ... ... ... ... ...Opp. Party CORAM: THEHONBLEMR.JUSTICED.N.UPADHYAY. ForthePetitioner: Mr.RajeevKumar,Advocate. FortheState: A.P .P. 04/17.09.2012 Itappearsthatcriminalantecedentofthepetitionerwascalledfor fromtheS.P.,Khuntibutithasnotyetbeenreceived. CounselfortheStateseekstimetogettheordercompliedwith. PutupthiscaseonThurdayi.e.on20.09.2012. NameofMiss.AnitaSinhabereflectedinthedailycauseliston behalfoftheState. LetacopyofthisorderbehandedovertheCounselfortheState. [D.N.Upadhyay,J.] P.K.S....
Jyoti Singh Alias Jyoti Kumar Singh Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-17-2012
INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI A.B.A.No.2339of2012 JyotiSingh@JyotiKumarSingh. ... ... ... ...Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand. ... ... ... ... ... ...Opp. Party CORAM: THEHONBLEMR.JUSTICED.N.UPADHYAY. ForthePetitioner: Mr.AnilKumarJha,Advocate. FortheState: A.P .P. 03/17.09.2012 ItrevealsfromthewritttenreportthatthepetitionerrealizedRs. 90,000/ on the false pretext to provide employament in the Railway to the brotheroftheinformant. Itisadmittedbytheinformantthatthetransactionwasheldinthe year2009butthiscasehasbeenlodgedintheyear2011. CounselfortheStatehasopposedtheprayer. Itappearsthatpetitionerhascheatedtheinformanttothetuneof Rs.90,000/.Idonotfeelinclinedtoadmitthispetitioneronancitipatorybail. Accordingly, the same is dismissed in Sarath P.S. Case No. 80 of 2011 (G.R.No.302 of 2011), pending in the Court of Shri D.C. Mishra, Judicial Magistrate,MadhupuratDeoghar. [D.N.Upadhyay,J.] P.K.S....
Anil Jethwa Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-17-2012
In the High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi Cr.M.P.No.1305 of 2011 Anil Jethwa @ Jetua..............Petitioner VERSUS State of Jharkhand and another..Opposite Parties CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE R.R.PRASAD For the Petitioner: Mr.Ananda Sen For the State :.A.P.P 2.17.9.12. Let the complainant be impleaded as opposite party no.2. Mr.T.N.Verma, learned counsel for the State accepts notice on behalf of newly impleaded opposite party no.2. As prayed for, let this matter be listed after three weeks to enable learned counsel appearing for the State to seek instruction and to file counter affidavit . Let a copy of the petition be served upon the counsel appearing for the opposite party no.2 by tomorrow. Till then, further proceeding of C/3 case no.38 of 2010, pending in the court of Sub-divisional Judicial Magistrate, Sadar at Chaibasa shall remain stayed so far the petitioner is concerned. Let the name of Mr.T.N.Verma be appeared in the daily cause list as counsel on behalf of the State. (R.R.Pras...
Rajesh Mahto Vs. State of Jharkhand and Another
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-17-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B. A. No. 5144 of 2012 Rajesh Mahto ..... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .. Opposite Party -------- CORAM : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H. C. MISHRA ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pandey, Advocate For the State : Mr. T.N. Verma, A.P.P. For the O.P. No.2 : Mr. Munna Lal Yadav, Advocate ------ 5/ 17.09.2012 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the Prosecution, as also learned counsel for opposite party No.2. The petitioner has been made accused for the offence under Sections 498-A, 323, 379 and 494 of the Indian Penal Code, in connection with Complaint Case No. 169 of 2003. There is allegation against the petitioner to have subjected the complainant-wife to cruelty and torture for demand of dowry and to have married another lady. The petitioner is in custody since 11.5.2012 In the facts of the case, I am inclined to enlarge the petitioner, Rajesh Mahto, on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner, named above, is...
Prakash Kumar Ravi Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-17-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI ----- L.P.A. NO.288 of 2012 ----- Prakash Kumar Ravi ....Appellant. --Versus --- State of Jharkhand & Ors. ...... ....Respondents. --- CORAM : HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE JAYA ROY ----- For the Appellant : Mr.Nitin Prasad, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr.Sarvesh Kumar Verma, Advocate. ------ Order No. 04 Dated :17th September, 2012 Admit. Issue notice to the respondent no.4. Meanwhile, operation of the impugned judgment dated 18.06.2012 shall remain stayed. (Prakash Tatia, C.J.) ( Jaya Roy, J.) Biswas/SI...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »