Jharkhand Court September 2012 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Ashok Kumar Modi Vs. Pradip Kumar Goenka and ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-17-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND,RANCHI. W.P(C) No.878 of 2011 Ashok Kumar Modi .. Petitioner(s) Versus Pradeep Kumar Goenka & Ors..... . . ..Respondent(s) CORAM :- HONBLE MR. JUSTICE P.P.BHATT For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. R.N.Prasad Mr. Manoj Kumar 3/17.9.2012 The present petitioner by way of filing this petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India has prayed for issuance of an appropriate writ/order/direction for setting aside the order dated 13.12.2010 passed by the learned Sub-Judge I Dumka in Title Eviction suit no 10 of 1995 whereby the learned court below has allowed the application for amendment of the plaint dated 22.11.2010 filed by the respondent under order VI Rule 17 CPC. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. Perused the impugned order as well as other documents produced with this petition. It appears that the learned court below vide order dated 13.12.2010 allowed the amendment application moved by the respondent whereby he has sought amendment i...
Harshwardhan S.Saini Vs. Birla Institute of Technology
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-17-2012
L.P.A. No. 267 o05. 17.09.2012 As prayed for, put up this case on 18th September, 2012 in Supplementary list. (Prakash Tatia, C.J) (Jaya Roy, J.) Alankar/-...
Rajesh Kumar ? Rajesh Prasad Vs. State of Jharkhand and anr
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-17-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr.Revision No.361 of 2012 ------ Rajesh Kumar @ Rajesh Prasad . Petitioner -Versus- The State of Jharkhand & Anr. ..... Opposite Parties ------ CORAM : THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H.C.MISHRA ------ For the Petitioner : Mr.Md.Faruque Ansari, Advocate. For the State : A.P.P. ------ I.A No.1405 o3. 17.09.2012 This is an admitted application. The aforesaid interlocutory application has been filed by the petitioner, submitting that during pendency of this revision application, the Court below by order dated 21.8.2012 has issued distress warrant against the petitioner for realization of the amount. In view of the fact that the case has already been admitted and the lower court record has been called for in this case, the further proceedings against the petitioner, Rajesh Kumar @ Rajesh Prasad in the Court of Sri Abhas Verma, learned Judicial magistrate, 1st class, Daltonganj, or his successor, in connection with Comp. Case No.367 of 2007 / T.R. No.585 of ...
Lalit Kishore and anr Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-17-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 1463 of 2012 Lalit Kishore and Gahesh Ram .... Petitioners Versus State of Jharkhand & another ... Opposite Parties Coram : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE D.N.UPADHYAY For the petitioner (s): Mr. Indrajit Sinha For the opposite party : Addl.P.P. 17.09.2012 Put up this case after one week, as prayed for. In the meantime, learned counsel for the petitioners is directed to service copy of the bail application on the counsel for the informant. Till the next date, interim order dated 18.05.2012 shall continue. Ambastha/- ( D.N.Upadhyay,J.)...
Birendra Singh Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-17-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(C) No. 2575 of 2007 Birendra Singh Petitioner -V e r s u s- The State of Jharkhand and Others Respondents. CORAM: - HONBLE MR. JUSTICE APARESH KUMAR SINGH. For the Petitioner : - Mr. Anuj Kumar, Adv. For the Respondents : - JC to GP-IV 06/17.09.2012 Learned counsel for the respondents seeks some time to obtain instruction in view of the supplementary affidavit filed on behalf of the petitioner. List this after two weeks. Till then, interim order dated 14.6.2007 shall continue. (Aparesh Kumar Singh, J.) Kamlesh/...
Abrar HussaIn Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-17-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A No.5921 of 2012 ------ Abrar Hussain @ Hasan @ Abrar Hasan . Petitioner -Versus- The State of Jharkhand ..... Opposite Party ------ CORAM : THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H.C.MISHRA ------ For the Petitioner : Mr.Nilesh Kumar, Advocate. For the State : A.P.P. ------ 4/ 17.09.2012 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as also learned counsel for the State. The petitioner has been made accused in Kotwali P.S Case No.352 of 2012 corresponding to G.R No.1797 of 2012 for the offence under Sections 467, 468, 470, 471, 419, 420, 120 B of the I.P.C. The petitioner is alleged to be involved in preparing the forged documents relating to I-Cards, Certificates etc. In the facts of this case, I am inclined to release the petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner, Abrar Hussain @ Hasan @ Abrar Hasan is directed to be released on bail, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfactio...
Ramnarayan Singh Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-17-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI ----- L.P.A. NO.276 of 2012 ----- Ramnarayan Singh ....Appellant. --Versus --- State of Jharkhand & Ors. ...... ....Respondents. --- CORAM : HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE JAYA ROY ----- For the Appellant : M/s.Dr.S.N.Pathak & Fayyaz Ahmad, Advocates. For the Respondents : J.C. to A.G. ------ Order No. 05 Dated :17th September, 2012 Heard learned counsel for the parties. The petitioner-appellant is aggrieved against the judgment dated 26.04.2012 by which the writ petition of the petitioner challenging the order dated 14.02.2002 passed by Director General cum inspector General of Police, Jharkhand affirming the order dated 27.02.2001 passed by the Inspector General of Police, Jharkhand and the order dated 17.04.2001 passed by Superintendent of Police, Pakur have been dismissed. Learned counsel for the appellant vehemently submitted that the petitioner-appellant was not supplied with the enquiry report and, therefore, prejudice has...
Bablu Sahu Alias Raju Kumar Sahu Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-17-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr.Revision No.727 of 2012 ------ Bablu Sahu @ Raju Kumar Sahu . Petitioner -Versus- The State of Jharkhand & Ors. ..... Opposite Parties ------ CORAM : THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H.C.MISHRA ------ For the Petitioner : Mr.A.K.Das, Advocate. For the State : A.P.P. ------ 2/ 17.09.2012 In view of the office note, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to convert this revision application into an appeal. Permission is accorded. Let this application be converted into an appeal, be re-registered as such and be listed after proper Stamp Reporting. (H.C.Mishra, J.) B.S/...
Daroga Hansda Alias Darogha Hansda and Another Vs. the State of Jharkh ...
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-17-2012
INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI A.B.A.No.2106of2012 1. [email protected]. PuliceHansda@PoliceHansda. ... ... ... ...Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand. ... ... ... ... ... ...Opp. Party CORAM: THEHONBLEMR.JUSTICED.N.UPADHYAY. ForthePetitioners: Mr.SanatKumarJha,Advocate. FortheState: A.P .P. 03/17.09.2012 ItrevealsfromtheF.I.R.thatcoalcollectedthroughillegalmining was seized by the police and the villagers disclosed the name of these two petitioners,whousedtocollectcoalandsendthesametothetradersofWest Bengal. Itissubmittedthatthepetitionershavenoconcernwiththestolen coal.Theywerenotatallpresentattheplaceattherelevanttime.Someofthe coaccusedpersonshavingsimilarallegationhavebeengrantedbailbythisCourt in A.B.A.No. 4342 of 2011 and the case of the present petitioners stands on similarfooting. LearnedCounselfortheStatehasopposedtheprayer. Itappearsthatnothingincriminatingmaterialshavebeenrecovered fromtheconstructivepossessionofthesepetitioners. Consideringtheaforesaidas...
Md.JainuddIn and Others Vs. State of Jharkhand and Others
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-17-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (C) No.1610 of 2007 --- Md. Jainuddin & others --- --- --- Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand & others --- ---- --- Respondents --- CORAM: The Honble Mr. Justice Aparesh Kumar Singh For the Petitioners: Mr. Prakash Chandra, Advocate For the State: GP-III --- 7/ 17.09.2012 Heard learned counsel for the parties.2. These thirteen writ petitioners have challenged the notice issued by the respondent nos. 8 to 10 for recovery of the loan amount on the basis of Kisan Credit Card (Agriculture Loan) which, according to the petitioners themselves, involves principal amount sanctioned above Rs. 10,000/- taken in the year 2000-2001 for the purpose of development of agriculture purposes and sanctioned by the Dumka Central Cooperative Bank Limited, Dumka Branch-Sahebganj. Petitioners seek waiver of the aforesaid loan in view of the policy decision of the State Government.3. Learned counsel for the petitioners relies upon the letter dated 10.02.200...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »