Jharkhand Court September 2012 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Ram Kumar Das Vs. Prakash Chandra Manjhi and ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-17-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI M.A. No. 126 of 2010 Ram Kumar Das ..Appellant Versus Prakash Chandra Manjhi & others .Respondents ----- Coram:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA NATH TIWARI For the Appellant : Mr. K.P. Deo, Advocate ----- 05/17.09.2012 Issue notice to the respondents by Registered Post with A/d as well as by ordinary process, for which requisites etc. must be filed within one week, failing which this appeal shall stand rejected without further reference to a Bench. ( Narendra Nath Tiwari, J) I.A. No. 2836 of 2012 Issue notice to the respondents by Registered Post with A/d, for which requisites etc. must be filed within one week, failing which this I.A. shall stand rejected without further reference to a Bench. Until further orders, no coercive steps shall be taken against the appellants for executing the impugned award. ( Narendra Nath Tiwari, J) Rakesh/...
Sudha Devi Vs. State of Jharkhand and anr
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-17-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. Revision No. 120 of 2012 with I. A. No. 1093 of 2012 Sudha Devi ..... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand & Another .. Opposite Parties -------- CORAM : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H. C. MISHRA ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. P.K. Nayak, Advocate For the State : A.P.P. For the O.P. No.2 : Mr. Rajeev Anand, Advocate ------ 3/ 17.09.2012 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State, as also learned counsel for the complainant opposite party No.2. This revision has been filed against the Judgment and Order dated 18.6.2008 passed by Sri Amit Shekhar, learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Ranchi, in Complaint Case No. 255 of 2003| T.R. No. 1114 of 2008, whereby the petitioner was convicted and sentenced for the offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The conviction and sentence of the petitioner were upheld by the learned Appellate Court below by Judgment dated 16.1.2012 passed by learned Additional ...
Shibu Rana Vs. Tata Iron and Steel Co.Ltd. and or
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-17-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(C). No. 5686 of 2006 Shibu Rana Petitioner Versus Tata Iron & Steel Co. Ltd. & others ......... Respondents ---------- CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE APARESH KUMAR SINGH For the Petitioner : Mr. Amit Kr. Das For the Respondents : M/s M.S. Mittal, Manish Mishra & Shilpi John ----------- 06 /17.09.2012 Heard learned counsel for the parties. The petitioner has approached this court for a direction upon the respondent to provide new electricity connection to the petitioner. According to the petitioner he is living in Bistupur, South Part near TOP 847.which was gifted to his father by the raiyati landlord as back as on 25.11.1986 and the adjoining plot no. 847 and 849 are the ancestral raiyati lands of the petitioner. He applied for fresh electricity connection before the respondent on 13.5.2003 along with prescribed fee and had also filled up the prescribed forms, but no action was taken leaving him with no other option but to move this court. Learn...
Sanjay Kumar Gupta Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-17-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 1509 of 2012 Sanjay Kumar Gupta .... Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Sri Rohit Fogla Opposite Parties --- CORAM : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE D. N. UPADHYAY --- For the Petitioner : Mr. Amitabh For the State : A.P.P. For O.P. No. 2 : Mr. Binod Singh --- 2. 17.09.2012: The petitioner is an accused in a case registered under Sections 406, 420 and 34 I.P.C. in connection with Bariatu P.S. Case No. 7 of 2011 (G.R. Case No. 44 of 2011), pending in the Court of CJM, Ranchi. It reveals from the written report that the accused persons including the petitioner assured that the property standing in the name of Smt. Rup Kumari Tiwari shall be transferred in the name of Vijay Kumar Agrawal in whose firm the informant is employed. After giving such assurance the accused persons had realized Rs. 65 Lakhs out of which Rs. 25 Lakhs was taken by this petitioner, but the land was not transferred in the name of Vijay Kr. Agrawal and the money was ...
Shyan Narayan Singh and ors Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-17-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. M.P. No.1037 o1. Shyam Narayan Singh 2. Shri Ram Babu Singh 3. Shri Ashok Kumar Singh Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand & Ors. Opp. Parties ----- CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE R.R. PRASAD ----- For the Petitioners : Mr. R.S. Mazumdar, Sr. Advocate For the State : APP For the O.P. : Mr. Rajan Raj, Advocate ----- 05/17.09.2012: Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioners, State and learned counsel appearing for the Opp. Parties. An application was filed on behalf of Opp. Party Nos. 2 to 6 for initiating a proceeding under Section 133 Cr.P.C. against the Opp. Party Nos.7 to 11. The learned Magistrate having satisfied that the land in question, which is being used by the residents, as passage, has been obstructed by the Opp. Party No.7 to 11 initiated the proceeding. Upon initiation of the proceeding under Section 133 Cr.P.C., Opp. Party Nos. 7 to 11 were asked vide order dated 31.03.2009 to submit their show cause. Pursuant to that,...
M/S Panch Sheel Udyog Vs. Union of India and ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-17-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(T) No. 2659 of 2012 M/s Panch Sheel Udyog Sonari. ...... Petitioner Vs. The Union of India & Ors. ... Respondents ------ CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE JAYA ROY ---- For the Petitioner: Mr. Sumeet Gadodia For the Respondents: j.C to Mr. Ratnesh Kumar ------ Order No. 10 Dated 17th September, 2012 Learned counsel for the respondents is since sick, therefore, time has been sought for. As prayed for, put up this case after two weeks. Till then, the interim order dated 18th May, 2012 shall remain continued. (Prakash Tatia, C J) (Jaya Roy , J) Alankar/-...
AmIn Mahto and anr Vs. State of Jharkhand and anr
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-17-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI ----- Cont. Case (Civil) No. 550 of 2011 ----- Amin Mahto & Anr. .... Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand & Anr. .... Respondents ----- CORAM : HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE JAYA ROY For the Petitioners : Ms. Ritu Kumar, Advocate For the Respondents : G.A. ----- Order No.09 Dated 17th September, 2012 The Deputy Commissioner, Seraikella-Kharsawan is present along with the counsel. The Deputy Commissioner has submitted an affidavit in response to the order of this Court dated 24th August, 2012. Learned counsel for the petitioners has disputed the correctness of the figure relying upon the documents and the pleadings which were filed in the writ petition wherein order has been passed directing the respondents to take action in the matter of illegal allotment of the money to the persons in two schemes. The Deputy Commissioner may look in all the aspects afresh and may submit the details of the action taken as well as the recov...
Alok Kumar Singh Alias Munna Singh Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-17-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A No.5579 of 2012 ------ 1. Makwa Khatoon 2. Sarfuddin Mian . Petitioners -Versus- The State of Jharkhand & Anr. ..... Opposite Parties ------ CORAM : THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H.C.MISHRA ------ For the Petitioners : Mr.Arwind Kumar, Advocate. For the State : A.P.P. For the Opp.Party no.2 : Mr.S.K.Pandey, Advocate. ------ 5/ 17.09.2012 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as also learned counsel for the State as also learned counsel for the complainant opposite party No.2. The petitioners have been made accused in Complaint Case No.227 of 2011 for the offence under Sections 323, 504, 379, 498A of the I.P.C. and Sections 3 / 4 of the D.P.Act. The petitioners are the father-in-law and mother-in-law of the victim lady and there is allegation against them also to have subjected her to cruelty and torture for the demand of dowry. There are other allegations also against the father-in-law. Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the...
Balmukund Agarwal Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-17-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr.Revision No.380 of 2012 ------ Balmukund Agarwal . Petitioner -Versus- The State of Jharkhand ..... Opposite Party ------ CORAM : THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H.C.MISHRA ------ For the Petitioner : Mr.Ayush Aditya, Advocate. For the State : A.P.P. ------ I.A No.1390 o6. 17.09.2012 The aforesaid interlocutory application has been filed for condonation of delay of 15 days in filing the revision application. In view of the statements made in the interlocutory application, the delay in filing the revision application is hereby, condoned. Accordingly, the aforesaid I.A stands allowed. (H.C.Mishra, J.) B.S/...
Ms Hiralal Bhagwati Prasad Vs. Hargobind Singh
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-17-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(C) No.4103 of 2012 with I.A. No.2212 of 2012 M/s Hiralal Bhagwati Prasad petitioner -Versus- Hargobind Singh ...Respondent. ------ CORAM : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA NATH TIWARI ------ For the petitioner : Mr. Ayush Aditya, Advocate For the Respondent : Mr. Amar Kr. Sinha, Advocate ------ 7/17.09.2012: In this writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for quashing the order dated 18.6.2008 (Annexure-4) passed by learned Sub- Divisional Officer, Sadar-cum-House Rent Controller, Ranchi in B.B.C. Case No.18/2007 and also for quashing the order dated 16.12.2011 (Annexure-5) passed by the Deputy Commissioner, Ranchi in B.B.C. Appeal No.49-R-15/2008-09, whereby the petition filed by the tenant-petitioner under Section 9 of the Bihar Building (Lease, Rent and Eviction) Control Act, 1982 for carrying out certain repair in the tenanted premises has been rejected. In the I.A. the petitioner-applicant has prayed for an interim order allowing him for c...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »