Jharkhand Court September 2012 Judgments
Kamdeo Yadav Alias Mukesh Prasad Yadav Vs. the State of Jharkhand and ...
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-17-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI. W.P. (C) No. 4346 of 2012 Kamdeo Yadav @ Mukesh Prasad Yadav Petitioner -V e r s u s- The State of Jharkhand & Others Respondents. CORAM: - HONBLE MR. JUSTICE P.P. BHATT. For the Petitioner : - Mr. Mohan Kumar Dubey, Advocates. For the Respondents : - Mr. V. K. Prasad, S.C. (L&C). 02/17.09.2012 The petitioner by way of present petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, has prayed for issuance of an appropriate writ/order/ direction, directing the Respondent No. 4 to accept the execution of the deed of transfer and to register the transferred deed executed by the petitioner.2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned counsel representing the Respondent-State.3. Perused the papers and other materials produced on record.4. It is the case of the petitioner that the land appertaining Mouza Shayamganj No. 413, Zamabandi No. 3165/Ga, within Deoghar Municipal Ward No. 6 recorded as 'Basauri' land, is possessed by th...
Tag this Judgment!Jairam Oraon Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-17-2012
INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI A.B.A.No.2303of2012 JairamOraon. ... ... ... ... ... ...Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand. ... ... ... ... ... ...Opp. Party CORAM: THEHONBLEMR.JUSTICED.N.UPADHYAY. ForthePetitioner: Mr.MohitPrakash,Advocate. FortheState: A.P .P. 05/17.09.2012 Itrevealsfromthewrittenreportthatnieceoftheinformantwas subjectedtorapebythepetitionerandhisassociates. Itissubmittedthatthevictimisagedabout30years.Shehasbeen examinedunderSection164Cr.P.C.inwhichshehasnotraisedallegationforthe commissionofrapeonherrathershehasstatedthatshewassimplyassaultedby theaccusedpersons. LearnedCounselfortheStatehasopposedtheprayer. Consideringtheaforesaidfactsandcircumstanceofthecase,the petitioner isdirected to surrender before the court below within three weeks fromtodayandifhedoessoheshallbereleasedonbailonfurnishingbailbond ofRs.10,000/(Tenthousand)withtwosuretiesoflikeamounteachtothe satisfactionoftheChiefJudicialMagistrate,GumlainconnectionwithGumlaP.S. Case No. 59 of 2012,...
Tag this Judgment!Ashok Kumar Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-17-2012
In the High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi Cr.M.P.No.1814 of 2012 Ashok Kumar ....................................... Petitioner VERSUS State of Jharkhand and another..Opposite Parties CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE R.R.PRASAD For the Petitioner: Mr.R.M.Singh For the State :A.P.P 2.17.9.12. Issue notice be issued to the opposite party no.2 to show cause as to why this application be not admitted and/or, if possible, be not disposed of at the admission stage itself, for which requisites for issuance of notice under registered cover with A/D must be filed within one week. Put up this case after three weeks to enable learned counsel appearing for the State to file counter affidavit. Until further order, no coercive action shall be taken against the petitioner of Mandu (Kuju) P.S case no.171 of 2012 (G.R.No.3010 of 2012), pending in the court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Hazaribagh. (R.R.Prasad, J.) ND/...
Tag this Judgment!Arun Kumar Paswan Vs. Union of India and ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-17-2012
L.P.A. No. 290 o05. 17.09.2012 As prayed for, put up this case after four weeks. (Prakash Tatia, C.J) (Jaya Roy, J.) Alankar/-...
Tag this Judgment!Basant Kumar Agarwalla Vs. Raju Vishwakarma
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-17-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND,RANCHI. W.P(C) No. 3649 of 2012 Basant Kumar Agarwalla .. Petitioner(s) Versus Raju Vishwakarma. . . ..Respondent(s) CORAM :- HONBLE MR. JUSTICE P.P.BHATT For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Shailesh 3/17.9.2012 The present petitioner by way of filing this petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India has prayed for issuance of an appropriate writ/order/direction for quashing the order dated 18.2.2012 passed in Title Appeal No. 166 of 2009 by the District Judge-II Dhanbad whereby the application filed by the appellant/respondent under Orcder 41 Rule 5(i) C.P.C for stay of the Execution Case No. 14 of 2009 has been allowed. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and perused the impugned order(Annexure-4) and other documents produced on record.. On perusal of the impugned order it appears that the Title Appeal No. 166 of 2009 has been preferred against the judgment and order dated 28.8.2009 passed in T(Evi) Suit No. 65 of 2003 by the learn...
Tag this Judgment!K.R.Vishwanath Gupta Vs. State of Jharkhand and anr
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-17-2012
In the High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi Cr.M.P.No.1397 of 2011 K.R.Vishwanath Gupta ...............Petitioner VERSUS State of Jharkhand and another..Opposite Parties CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE R.R.PRASAD For the Petitioner: Mr.Prabhat Kumar Sinha 2/ 17.9.12. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this application. Permission is accorded. This application is dismissed as withdrawn. (R.R.Prasad, J.) ND/...
Tag this Judgment!Haripada Roy Vs. the State of Jharkhand and anr
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-17-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 2122 of 2012 Haripada Roy .. Petitioner Versus State of Jharkhand & another ... Opposite Parties Coram : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE D.N.UPADHYAY For the petitioner (s): Mr Mukesh Kumar For the opposite party : Addl.P.P. 17.09.2012 Put up this case after one week, as prayed for. Till the next date, no coercive steps shall be taken against the petitioner in connection with C.P. case No. 829 of 2010 pending in the court of Sri Arbind Kumar, Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Bokaro. Ambastha/- ( D.N.Upadhyay,J.)...
Tag this Judgment!Tej Narayan Singh and anr Vs. Jharkhand State Tourism Develo
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-17-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI ----- Cont. Case (Civil) No. 252 of 2011 ----- Tej Narayan Singh & Anr. .... Petitioner Versus Jharkhand State Tourism Development Corporation Ltd. & Ors. .... Respondents ----- CORAM : HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE JAYA ROY For the Petitioner : Mr. Ranjan Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Respondents : Mr. Tapas Kabiraj, Advocate ----- Order No.15 Dated 17th September, 2012 In this case, learned counsel for the appellant submitted that Special Leave Petition preferred by the respondents has been dismissed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court, and therefore, respondents should have complied with the direction issued by this Court in order dated 14 th May, 2003. Learned counsel for the respondents has submitted that a meeting of Board of Directors has been convened which is to be held on 21st September, 2012. In view of the above statement of learned counsel for the respondents, matter is adjourned to 1st October, 2012. We may make it clear ...
Tag this Judgment!Md Mansoor Alam Alias Manzoor Alam Vs. the State of Jharkhand and anr
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-17-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 2121 of 2012 Md Mansoor Alam @ Manzoor Alam ... Petitioner Versus State of Jharkhand & another ... Opposite Parties Coram : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE D.N.UPADHYAY For the petitioner (s): Mr.Mahavir Pd. Sinha 4. For the opposite party : Addl.P.P. 17.09.2012 Counsel for the petitioner is directed to file requisites for issuance of notice to the opposite party no. 2 under registered cover with A/d as well as under ordinary process within a week. Ambastha/- ( D.N.Upadhyay,J.)...
Tag this Judgment!Sajjan Kumar Agarwal Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-17-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 2318 of 2012 Sajjan Kumar Agarwal @ Sajjan Agarwal .... Petitioner Versus State of Jharkhand ... Opposite Party Coram : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE D.N.UPADHYAY For the petitioner (s): Mr.A.K.Chaturvedi For the opposite party : Addl.P.P. 17.09.2012 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the State. This is an application for grant of anticipatory bail filed by the petitioner in connection with Ranka PS case No. 96 of 2010 for the offence registered under sections 467/468/471/420/414/120B of the Indian Penal Code. It reveals from the self statement of S.I. A.K.Singh that three trucks loaded with cement were seized by the Police and the documents seized were indicating that cement was loaded on the trucks from the firm of this petitioner and other co-accused. It is submitted that one of the co-accused has been granted anticipatory bail vide ABA No. 3944 of 2011. Learned counsel for the State after going through h...
Tag this Judgment!- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »