Jharkhand Court March 2012 Judgments
Central Bureau of Investigation Vs. State of Jharkhand and Another
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Mar-23-2012
This application filed on behalf of the C.B.I is directed against the order dated 10.2.2010 passed by the learned A.J.C, F.T.C. X, Ranchi in Sessions Trial No.768 of 2009 holding therein that permission sought by the C.B.I for further investigation in terms of the provision contained in Section 173(8) of the Code of Criminal Procedure is never required as the C.B.I under the provision is free to submit further report to the Magistrate after collecting the evidences. The backdrop of the case is that one Anita Singh submitted a written complaint on 4.7.2009 stating therein that her husband Anil Kumar Singh, Range Officer in the Department of Forest was posted at Ranchi. On the fateful day, he had gone to the office. While she was in her house, she was telephonically informed that at about 7.15 P.M. when her husband came out of the office, miscreants came on a Motor Cycle and fired at him. The Motor Cycle got dashed by the Maruti Van of her husband and the miscreant left that place leavin...
Tag this Judgment!Munna Rai @ Satrughan Rai and Others Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Mar-20-2012
1. These appeals arise out of the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 04.02.2010 and 05.02.2010 respectively, passed by Additional Judicial Commissioner, F.T.C., Ranchi, in Sessions Trial No. 168 of 2001, convicting the appellants under section 302/34/120(B) of the Indian Penal Code and 27 of the Arms Act and sentencing them to undergo R.I. for 3 years and a fine of Rs.2,000/- each and in default thereof, S.I. for 2 months under section 27 of the Arms Act, life imprisonment and fine of Rs.5,000/- each and in default thereof, S.I. for 3 years under section 302/34/120(B) of the Indian Penal Code. 60% of the fine was to be paid to P.W-4-father of the deceased. The sentences were to run concurrently. 2. The prosecution case in short is that the informant-Arun Kumar -P.W-5, who happens to be an advocate of Civil Court, Ranchi, lodged a fardbeyan on 12.05.2000 at 7.45 P.M. to the following effect. There was some dispute between his younger brother-Rajesh Kumar (deceased) and o...
Tag this Judgment!Rajib Ranjan, Chairman, J.S.E.B. Vs. Madhuri Kumari and Another
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Mar-01-2012
1. The husband of respondent, Ramanuj Prasad, who was an Advocate's Clerk, when he was coming to the High Court he suffered shock because of the fall of 11000 Volt wire on the road and ultimately he died. A report was submitted in Kanke Police Station on the same day being Kanke P.S. U.D. Case No. 4 of 2001 on 30th March, 2001. The wife of the deceased, Ramanuj Prasad preferred writ petition being W.P.(C) No. 2025 of 2002, which was decided by this Court vide order dated 11th June, 2002 and it was observed that “as the matter requires determination by the respondents at first instance, the case be remitted to the Chairman, JSEB, who will determine both the issues relating to payment of damages and appointment of writ petitioner on compassionate ground within two months from the date of receipt of representation as may be preferred by the said petitioner”. 2. It appears that in pursuance of the direction of this Court contained in order dated 11th June, 2002 the representati...
Tag this Judgment!- ‹ Prev
- Next ›