Jharkhand Court December 2012 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Chandan Kumar Choudhary Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Dec-19-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 8702 of 2012 Chandan Kumar Choudhary ..... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand . Opposite Party CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H. C. MISHRA For the Petitioner :Mr. Md. Ashrafuzzaman Khan For the State :A. P.P. ----- 04/19.12.2012 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the Prosecution. Petitioner has been made accused for the offence under Section 408, 420, 379, 369, 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code, in connection with Deoghar Nagar Thana P.S. Case No. 301 of 2011, corresponding to G.R. No. 829 of 2011. The case relates to the theft of the vehicle of the informant and it appears that the driver of the vehicle was murdered and the vehicle was taken away by the culprits. From the impugned order, it appears that the petitioner has been named in the confessional statement of the co-accused and it has also come that on the date of the occurrence, the petitioner was in jail custody. In the facts and circumstances of the...
Laxmi Narayan Paswan Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Dec-19-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A.No.2797 of 2012 Laxmi Narayan Paswan. ... ... ...Petitioner -Versus- The State of Jharkhand. ... ... ...Opp. Party ---------- CORAM: THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE D.N.UPADHYAY For the Petitioner: Mr. Shekhar Prasad Sinha, Advocate. For the State: A.P.P. ---------- 07/ 19.12.2012 The petitioner is an accused in a case registered under Sections 406/420/467/468/34 of the Indian Penal Code. It is submitted that similarly situated co-accused has been granted bail by this Court vide A.B.A.No.2380 of 2012 on 17.09.2012 and the case of the present petitioner stands on better footing. Counsel for the State does not dispute the submission. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner is directed to surrender before the court-below within three weeks from today and if he does so he shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- ( Ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chi...
State of Jharkhand Through the Vs. Smt.Geeta Rani and ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Dec-19-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI. F.A. No. 72 of 2012 The State of Jharkhand through the Deputy Commissioner, Giridih Appellant -V e r s u s- Smt. Geeta Rani & Another Respondents. with F.A. Nos. 71 of 2012, F.A. No. 73 of 2012 and F.A. No. 74 of 2012. ... CORAM: - HONBLE MR. JUSTICE P.P. BHATT. For the Appellant : - J.C. to S.C. (L&C). For the Respondents : - M/s. A. K. Sahani, Ajit Kr. and N. Chatterjee, Advocates. 09/19.12.2012 Defect no. 2 in F.A. No. 72 of 2012 pointed out vide office note dated 11.07.2012 is hereby ignored. Let the name of Mr. A. K. Sahani be indicated as learned counsel for the Respondents in F.A. No. 74 of 2012. It appears that by order dated 08.11.2012, more than one month's time was granted for the purpose of removal of defects. However, no steps have been taken till date for removal of the defects. The learned counsel appearing for the appellant-State Government submitted that he has received instructions from the Deputy Commissioner, Giridih that ne...
Tauhid Ansari Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Dec-19-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No.3722 of 2012 ---- Tauhid Ansari .... ... ... .... Petitioner ---Versus--- The State of Jharkhand & Anr. .........Opposite Parties ---- CORAM: HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE JAYA ROY ---- For the Petitioner : Mr. Anil Kr. Sinha, Advocate For the State : A.P.P. For the Informant : Mr. Nawal Kishore Prasad, Advocate ---- 4 / 19.12.2012 Counsel appearing for the petitioner and the counsel appearing for the informant have submitted that they have compromised the matter before the panchayat on certain terms and conditions. The parties are directed to file a joint petition annexing their compromise petition in which the terms and conditions of the compromise are mentioned. Put up this case on 10th January, 2013 under the same heading. Till then, Interim order dated 31.10.2012 shall continue. Counsel for the petitioner will deposit the cost of the fax to communicate this order to the court concerned. ( Jaya Roy, J.) SI/...
Dr.Ajit Kumar and ors Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Dec-19-2012
INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI W.P.(S)No.3164of2011 Dr.AjitKumar&Ors. ... Petitioners Versus TheStateofJharkhand&Ors. ... ... ... Respondents CORAM: HONBLEMR.JUSTICEALOKSINGH ForthePetitioners :Mr.K.K.Singh,Advocate FortheState :Mr.PurnenduSharan,J.C.toSr.S.C.II I.A.No.287of2012 03/19.12.2012 Thisisanapplicationseekingsubstitutionofthelegalrepresentative (widowofdeceasedpetitionerNo.12). For the reasons stated in the application, I.A. No. 287 of 2012 is allowed. W.P.(S)No.3172of2011 Letnecessaryamendmentbecarriedoutinthememoofthepartieson orbefore10thofJanuary,2013. (AlokSingh,J.) Manish...
Daya Shankar Shriwastava Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors.
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Dec-19-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (S) No. 2119 of 2004 --- Daya Shankar Shrivastava --- --- --- ---- Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand & others --- ---- --- Respondents --- CORAM: The Honble Mr. Justice Aparesh Kumar Singh For the Petitioner: None For the State: JC to SC-III --- 07/ 19.12.2012 No one appears on behalf of the petitioner. It appears that no one had appeared on behalf of the petitioner earlier also and the matter was adjourned on the last occasion, in the interest of justice, for five weeks. Counsel for the respondent is present. Since no one appears on behalf of the petitioner, the writ petition is dismissed for default. (Aparesh Kumar Singh, J) Ranjeet/...
Deo Narayan Mahto Vs. National Institute of Technolo
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Dec-19-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W. P. (S) No. 5079 of 2003 Chandu Devi Petitioner -V e r s u s- The National Institute of Technology, Jamshedpur and Ors. Respondents. CORAM: - HONBLE MR. JUSTICE APARESH KUMAR SINGH. For the Petitioner : - Mr. Manoj Tandon, Advocate. For the Respondents : - Mr. Manish Mishra, Advocate 20/19.12.2012 By this writ petition, the petitioner had come with a prayer to direct the respondents to upgrade him to the vacant post of Computer Operator/Data Entry Operator in the pay scale of Rs 4,5007,000/- in the M.C.A. Department w.e.f 14.09.2000 and for grant of consequential benefits of the arrear of salary in the said scale. The original petitioner was, subsequently, substituted by his wife (the present petitioner) during the pendency of the writ application. However, after some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to pursue the matter before the respondent authority being the respondent no. 2, the Director, National Institute o...
Binod Shankar Vs. State of Jharkhnand and anr
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Dec-19-2012
In the High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi Cr.M.P. No.1348 of 2012 Binod Shankar....................................Petitioner VERSUS State of Jharkhand and another ... .Opposite Parties CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE R.R.PRASAD For the Petitioner:Mr. Awanish Shankar For the State :A.P.P For the O.P.No.2 :Mr.Onkar Nath Tiwary 5/ 19.12.12. Learned counsel appearing for the opposite party no.2 submits that since the opposite party no.2 is out of station, he has not been able to take instruction and therefore, counter affidavit could not be filed. He further submits that if the case is posted in the second week of January, 2013, counter affidavit would be filed. As prayed for, let this matter be posted on 21.1.2013. Till then, interim order passed on 13.8.2012 shall continue. (R.R.Prasad, J.) ND/...
Anirudh Prasad Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Dec-19-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W. P. (S) No. 1496 of 2009 --- Anirudh Prasad Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand & others Respondents --- CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH --- For the Petitioner : Mr. Nilesh Kumar Agrawal, Advocate For the Respondents : Mr. A. K. Mehta, J.C. to S.C. (Mines) --- 7/19.12.2012 I. A. No. 3033 of 2010: This is an application seeking amendment in the writ petition. For the reasons stated in the application, amendment sought seems to be just and proper for the fair adjudication of the case. Consequently, I. A. No. 3033 of 2010 is allowed. Let amended writ petition be placed on record on or before 10th of January 2012 with advance copy to the learned counsel for the respondents. W. P. (S) No. 1496 of 2009: Counter affidavit to the amended writ petition may be filed within next four weeks. Rejoinder, if any may be filed within four weeks thereafter. (Alok Singh, J.) R.ShekharCp2...
Gora Chandra Das Vs. Home Department
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Dec-19-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W. P. (S) No. 7316 of 2012 --- Subhashini Besra Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand through the Secretary, Deptt. of Social Welfare, Govt. of Jharkhand, Ranchi 2. The Deputy Commissioner, Sahebganj 3. The Deputy Development Commissioner, Sahebganj 4. The District Social Welfare Officer, Sahebganj 5. The Child Development Project Officer, Borio, Sahebganj Respondents --- CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH --- For the Petitioner : Mr. Sumeet Gadodia, Advocate For the Respondents : Mr. Amrendra Pradhan, J.C. to G.P. VI --- 2/19.12.2012 Since, in the present case only question of law is involved pertaining to the jurisdiction of District Social Welfare Officer, therefore, present case is being disposed of finally at the admission stage with the consent of the learned counsel for the parties. Order impugned dated 14.08.2012, annexure no. 5 was passed by the District Social Welfare Officer, Sahebganj terminating the services of the petitio...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »