Jharkhand Court December 2012 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Sunil Kumar Mandal Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Dec-19-2012
INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI A.B.A.No.2360of2012 SunilKumarMandal .... .... . Petitioner Versus TheStateofJharkhand .... .... . OppositeParty CORAM :HON'BLEMRS.JUSTICEJAYAROY ForthePetitioner :Mr.DurgaCharanMishra,Advocate FortheState :A.P.P. 08/19.12.2012 Heard counsel appearing for the petitioner and counsel appearingfortheState. Petitionerisapprehendinghisarrestinconnectionwiththe case registered under Sections 467/468/471/420 of the Indian Penal Code in connection with Sundarpahari P.S. Case No. 19 of 2011 corresponding to G.R. No. 779 of 2011 pending in the Court of Chief JudicialMagistrate,Godda. Counselappearingforthepetitionerhassubmittedthatinthe departmental proceeding which has been instituted in connection with criminal case, the petitioner has been given minor punishment. In this regard, he has annexed the order of the department as Annexure3. Counselforthepetitionerhasfurthersubmittedthattheallegationagainst himisonlythathedidnotproducesomepapersbeforetheAuditparty. ...
Shagufta Begun and ors. Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors.
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Dec-19-2012
INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI W.P.(S)No.3709of2004 With W.P.(S)No.3819of2004 ShaguftaBegumandanother...Petitioners(InW.P.(S)No.3709of2004) BirendraMinjandanother...Petitioners(InW.P.(S)No.3819of2004) Versus TheStateofJharkhand&others ......Respondents CORAM:HONBLEMR.JUSTICEAPARESHKUMARSINGH ForthePetitioners : FortheRespondentsJPSC :Mr.SanjayPiprawal,Adv. 09/19.12.2012 Nooneappearsonbehalfofthepetitioners. Itappearsthaton the last several dates the cases have been adjourned as no one had appearedonbehalfofthepetitioners. LearnedcounselfortheJ.P.S.C,Mr.SanjayPiprawalinformsthat the issues raised in the present writ applications, were also subject matterofconsiderationinanothercasepreferredbyanotheraggrieved person,inwhichthematterwentuptotheHon'bleSupremeCourtof IndiaandhasbeenfinallydecidedinfavouroftheRespondentsState. He points out that the petitioners had themselves relied upon the DivisionBenchJudgmentofthisCourt,whichwasreportedin(2006)2 JLJR447. However,itwouldappearfromtheor...
Suraj Kumar Das Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Dec-19-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B. A. No. 8779 of 2012 --- Suraj Kumar Das Applicant Versus The State of Jharkhand Opposite Party --- CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH --- For the Applicant : Mr. Pratiush Lala, Advocate For the Opposite Party : Mr. Vijay Kumar Gupta, A.P.P. --- 4/19.12.2012 This is an application seeking regular bail in connection with S. T. No. 483 of 2012 arising out of Katras P.S. Case No. 180 of 2012 corresponding to G.R. No. 2961 of 2012 for the offence punishable under Sections 306/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the allegation against the applicant is that he is having illicit relation with Laxmi Devi, wife of the deceased and on the harassment made by the applicant, Rajesh Kumar Turi has committed suicide. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that cruel behaviour or harassment howsoever grave may be without there being any mens rea to derive the deceased to commit suicide would not amount to abetmen...
Dulal Manjhi ? Belal Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Dec-19-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. Appeal (DB) No.803 of 2008 Dulal Manjhi @ Belal Appellant. -Versus- The State of Jharkhand. .... Respondent. ------ CORAM : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA NATH TIWARI HONBLE MRS. JUSTICE JAYA ROY ------ For the Appellant : Mr. Shravan Kumar, Advocate. For the State : A.P.P. ------ I.A. No.1544 o6. 19.12.2012: In this I.A., the appellant has prayed for his release on bail during pendency of the appeal. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant submitted that though the appellant's prayer for bail was earlier rejected and lastly on July, 2011, he has remained in custody for about six years; there is no likelihood of the appeal being taken up for hearing in near future; the appellant, thus, deserves to be released on bail pending hearing of the appeal. Learned A.P.P. opposed the appellant's prayer for bail and submitted that all the grounds on merit were considered and appellant's prayers for bail were rejected; no fresh ground has been...
Taro Devi Vs. Central Coalfields Ltd. and ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Dec-19-2012
INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI W.P.(S)No.2081of2010 TaroDevi ... Petitioner Versus CentralCoalfieldsLtd.throughitsChairmancum ManagingDirector,Ranchi&Ors. ... ... ... Respondents CORAM: HONBLEMR.JUSTICEALOKSINGH ForthePetitioner :Mr.NandKishorePrasadSinha,Advocate FortheRespondents :Mr.AnandaSen,Advocate FortheRespondentNo.7:Mr.DeepakRoshan,Advocate I.A.No.1130of2011 07/19.12.2012 Thisisanapplicationseekingamendmentinthewritpetition. Forthereasonsstatedintheapplication,amendmentsoughtseemsto bejustandproperforfairadjudicationofthecase. Consequently,I.A.No.1130of2011isallowed. W.P.(S)No.2081of2010 Let amended writ petition be placed on record on or before 10th of January, 2013 with an advance copy to the learned counsel for the respondents. Letcounteraffidavittotheamendedwritpetitionbefiledwithinnext fourweeks. Rejoinderaffidavit,ifany,maybefiledwithinfourweeksthereafter. (AlokSingh,J.) Manish...
Rakesh Singh Alias Kanhaiya Singh Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Dec-19-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No.3811 of 2012 ---- Rakesh Singh @ Kanhaiya Singh .... Petitioner ---Versus--- The State of Jharkhand ........ .........Opposite Party ---- CORAM: HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE JAYA ROY ---- For the Petitioner : Mr. Hardeo Pd. Singh, Advocate For the State : A.P.P. ---- 6 / 19.12.2012 Heard the counsel for the petitioner and the counsel for the State. After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that if the Court directs, the petitioner is ready to deposit the amount, but in three installments. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, I direct the petitioner to deposit a sum of Rs.1Lakh(Rs.One Lakh) on or by 20th January, 2013 in the court below and further a sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rs.Fifty Thousand) on or by 20th February, 2013 in the court below. If the petitioner deposits the aforesaid amount as directed on or by 20th February, 2013 and surrenders within the said period, the trial court is directed to release ...
Deo Kumar Sah Vs. Steel Authority of India Ltd.
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Dec-19-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W. P. (S) No. 1734 of 2004 Sunil Kumar Singh Petitioner -V e r s u s- Steel Authority of India Ltd and Ors. Respondents. With W. P. (S) No. 1735 of 2004 Deo Kumar Sah Petitioner -V e r s u s- Steel Authority of India Ltd and Ors. Respondents. CORAM: - HONBLE MR. JUSTICE APARESH KUMAR SINGH. For the Petitioner : - Mr. Naresh Kumar Singh (In both cases) For the Respondents : - Mr. Ananda Sen(In both cases) 16/19.12.2012 Heard learned counsel for the parties. These petitioners have come before this court seeking quashing of reasoned order contained at Annexure-5 passed in their respective cases dated 04/06.11.2003 and 04/06.11.2003 by which their claim for compassionate appointment have been rejected. The case of these petitioners is that their fathers, who were permanent employees of the respondent's company, died in harness on 09.11.1997 and 20.12.1998 respectively. They had earlier came before this Court in C.W.J.C. No. 4299 of 2000, which was d...
Bidya Lakhan Bhagat Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Dec-19-2012
1 INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI Cr.M.P.(DB)No.2007of2012 BidyaLakhanBhagat Petitioner Versus 1.TheStateofJharkhand 2.DevDasBhagat ... ... ... Opp.Parties CORAM: HON'BLEMR.JUSTICED.N.PATEL HON'BLEMR.JUSTICEPRASHANTKUMAR ForthePetitioner : Mr.JitendraS.Singh FortheRespondent: Mr.VijayKumarGupta,A.P.P. OrderNo.5/Dated:19 th December2012 PerD.N.Patel,J1) Thepresentapplicationhasbeenpreferredunder378oftheCodeof Criminal Procedure for getting Special Leave to Appeal against the judgment and order dated 17th July 2012 passed by the learned Chief JudicialMagistrate,LateharinComplaintCaseNo.212of2008/TrialNo. 222of2012wherebythecomplaintcasefiledbythepetitionerhasbeen dismissed.2) Thecomplaintcasewasfiledbythecomplainantpetitionerbefore theChiefJudicialMagistrate,Lateharforallegedlycommittinganoffence underSection420oftheIndianPenalCodeagainsttheOppositeParty No .2 . The case of the complainantpetitioner, as per the complaint petition,isthatoppositepartyNo.2requestedthecomplainantpetitioner...
Lakhindra Nayak Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Dec-19-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 9454 of 2012 Lakhindra Nayak ..... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand . Opposite Party CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H. C. MISHRA For the Petitioner :Mr. Ashim Kr. Sahani For the State :A. P.P. ----- 02/19.12.2012 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the Prosecution. Petitioner has been made accused for the offence under Sections 379, 414 of the Indian Penal Code, in connection with Pithoria P.S. Case No. 57 of 2012, corresponding to G.R. No. 3578 of 2012. From the F.I.R., it appears that the petitioner is alleged to be involved in sale of stolen motorcycle. In the facts and circumstances of the case, I am inclined to release the petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner Lakhindra Nayak is directed to be released on bail, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri S. K. Maharaj, learned Judicial Magistrate, Ranchi, or hi...
Dr.Bhushan Sharma Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors.
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Dec-19-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P (S) No. 6762 of 2004 Dr. Bhushan Sharma Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand & others Respondents ---------- CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE APARESH KUMAR SINGH For the Petitioner : Mr. Altaf Hussain For the Respondent : J.C. to Sr. S.C. I ----------- I.A No. 3599 o10. /19.12.2012 By way of the instant interlocutory application petitioner has sought stay of the operation of letter bearing memo no. 958 datd 1.12.2012 contained in Annexure 1/A to the interlocutory application whereby the petitioner has been directed to vacate the quarter, failing which force would be used to get the quarter vacated. However, learned counsel for the petitioner does not intend to press this interlocutory application. In that view of the matter, the I.A. No. 3599 of 2012 is disposed of as not pressed. W.P (S) No. 6762 of 2004 Since, the writ petition relates to the year 2004, list this writ petition under the heading of admission in the first week of January, 2013....
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »