Jharkhand Court December 2012 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Smt.Bandana Singh Vs. Anil Kumar Singh
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Dec-19-2012
INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI I.A.No.3603of2010 In C.M.P .No.394of2010 Smt.BandanaSingh Petitioner Versus AnilKumarSingh ... ... ... Opp.Party CORAM: HON'BLEMR.JUSTICED.N.PATEL HON'BLEMR.JUSTICEPRASHANTKUMAR ForthePetitioner : Mr.RahulKumar FortheRespondent: OrderNo.2/Dated:19 th December2012 PerD.N.Patel,J1) Counselappearingfortheapplicantuponinstructionfromhisclientis notpressingthisapplicationwithaviewtopreferrevisionapplicationagainst theorderpassedbyFamilyCourt,Jamshedpur(EastSinghbhoom).2) Inviewofthesubmission,thisC.M.P.aswellasI.A.No.3603of2010 aredisposedofasnotpressed,atthisstage,reservinglibertytothepetitioner topreferrevisionapplication,ifitistenableatlaw. (D.N.Patel,J) (PrashantKumar,J) Raman/Binit...
Dewki Devi Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Dec-19-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 8714 of 2012 Dewki Devi ..... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand . Opposite Party CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H. C. MISHRA For the Petitioner :Mr. Sujay Dayal For the State :A. P.P. ----- 03/19.12.2012 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the Prosecution. Petitioner has been made accused for the offence under Sections 302, 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code, in connection with Dhurwa (Tupudana) P.S. Case No. 110 of 2012, corresponding to G.R. No. 2871 of 2012. The case was instituted by the petitioner herself upon the murder of her husband and the case was instituted against unknown. The petitioner was subsequently made accused in this case on the basis of the confessional statement of the co-accused. In the facts and circumstances of the case, I am inclined to release the petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner Dewki Devi is directed to be released on bail, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rup...
Aslam Ansari Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Dec-19-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 8608 of 2012 Asalam Ansari ..... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand . Opposite Party CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H. C. MISHRA For the Petitioner :Mr. Abhay Kr. Chaturvedy For the State :A. P.P. ----- 04/19.12.2012 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the Prosecution. Petitioner has been made accused for the offence under Sections 25(1-B)(a)/26/35 of the Arms Act, in connection with Majhiaon P.S. Case No. 154 of 2012, corresponding to G.R. No. 1483 of 2012. The petitioner was apprehended on 16.08.2012 and from the possession of the petitioner one country made Pistol was recovered. In the facts and circumstances of the case, I am inclined to release the petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner Asalam Ansari is directed to be released on bail, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Civil Judge (J.D.) VII, Garhwa,...
Sheikh Anwar HussaIn and ors Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Dec-19-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI WP(S) No. 1794 of 2003 ---- Sheikh Anwar Hussain ... Petitioner -Versus- State of Jharkhand & ors. ... Respondents ---- CORAM : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE APARESH KUMAR SINGH ---- For the Petitioner :Mr. G.K.Sinha For the Respondents :JC to GP III. ---- 8- 19.12.2012 Heard learned counsel for the parties. The petitioner has sought for reinstatement in service by directing the respondent no.4, Director, Rehabilitation and Land Acquisition Irrigation Department, Bihar, Patna and further for payment of salary from February, 1997 along with other consequential benefits. The petitioner has also sought quashing of the order dated 20th February,1997 vide Letter No.550 issued by the Bihar Government's Rehabilitation and Land Acquisition Department, Annexure 3, under the signature of the Director, Rehabilitation and Land Acquisition Department. The petitioner claimed to be appointed as a IV Grade employee in the Department of Rehabilitation and Land Acquisition,...
Sanjeev Kumar Alias Sonu Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Dec-19-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No.3794 of 2012 ---- Sanjeev Kumar @ Sonu ... .... Petitioner ---Versus--- 1.The State of Jharkhand 2.Sunita Devi .... ......... .........Opposite Parties ---- CORAM: HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE JAYA ROY ---- For the Petitioner : Mr. Shekhar Prasad Sinha, Advocate For the State : A.P.P. ---- 4 / 19.12.2012 Issue notice to the opposite party no.2 by registered post with A/D as well as under ordinary process, for which requisites etc., must be filed by 7th January, 2013, failing which, this application, shall stand rejected without further reference to the Bench. Till further order, the police will not arrest the petitioner namely Sanjeev Kumar @ Sonu in connection with the present case i.e. Sarath (Chitra) P.S.Case No.53 of 2012, corresponding to G.R. No.176 of 2012, pending in the court of Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Madhupur. Counsel for the petitioner will deposit the cost of the fax to communicate this order to the court concerned. ( Jaya ...
Jai Prakash Pilley Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Dec-19-2012
INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI A.B.A.No.3681of2012 1.JaiPrakashPilley 2.PushpaMudliyar@PushpaBeli .... .... . Petitioners Versus TheStateofJharkhand .... .... . OppositeParty CORAM :HON'BLEMRS.JUSTICEJAYAROY ForthePetitioners :Mr.BijayKumarSinha,Advocate FortheState :A.P.P. 05/19.12.2012 Heard counsel appearing for the petitioners and counsel appearingfortheState. Petitioners are apprehending their arrest inconnection withthecaseregisteredunderSection498AoftheIndianPenalCoderead withSectionoftheDowryProhibitionAct. Counselappearingforthepetitionershassubmittedthatthe petitionerno.1isfatherinlawandpetitionerno.2ismarriedsisterinlaw (Nanad).Itisalsosubmittedthatthesonofthepetitionerno.1,whois husbandofthecomplainant,hasalreadyfiledacaseunderSection9of theHinduMarriageActforrestitutionofconjugalrightandthesamehas beendecreedinfavourofsonofthepetitioner.Hehasfurthersubmitted thatpresentpetitionerandhissonisreadytotakethecomplainantwith themwithproperdignity,respectandlove. Counselappear...
Upjal HussaIn Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Dec-19-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 8701 of 2012 Upjal Hussain ..... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand . Opposite Party CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H. C. MISHRA For the Petitioner :Mr. Gautam Kumar For the State :A. P.P. ----- 03/19.12.2012 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the Prosecution. Petitioner has been made accused for the offence under Sections 363(A), 370 of the Indian Penal Code, in connection with Taljhari P.S. Case No. 43 of 2012, corresponding to G.R. No. 514 of 2012. The petitioner has been apprehended while kidnapping and fleeing away with four year old son of the informant. In the facts and circumstances of the case, I am not inclined to release the petitioner Upjal Hussain on bail. Accordingly, the prayer for bail of the petitioner is rejected. (H. C. Mishra, J) Umesh/-...
Sabitri Devi Vs. Food Supply
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Dec-19-2012
INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI W.P.(C)No.6307of2012 SabitriDevi. ...Petitioner. Versus TheStateofJharkhand&Ors. ...Respondents. CORAM:HONBLEMR.JUSTICENARENDRANATHTIWARI ForthePetitioner : Mr.R.S.Mazumdar,Sr.Advocate FortheState : J.C.toS.C.III 03/19.12.2012: Inthiswritpetition,thepetitionerhasprayedforquashingtheorder dated15th April,2012(Annexure3)passedbytheSubdivisionalOfficer, Dhanbad,wherebythepetitionersP.D.Slicensehasbeencancelled. The sole grievance of the petitioner is that the impugned orderhas been passed without giving any notice informing thereasonsandwithoutaffordinganyopportunitytorepresentagainst thesame. It has been submitted that the impugned order has beenpassedinviolationofClause11oftheBiharTradeArticles(License andUnification)Order,1984[hereinafterreferredtoasthesaidOrder] as well as the principle of natural justice and is ab initio void. The impugnedorderisliabletobequashedbythisCourt. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submitted thatthelicensewasgrante...
Md Saheb Alias Saheb Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Dec-19-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A.No. 3953 of 2012 Md. Saheb @ Saheb. ... ... ...Petitioner -Versus- 1. The State of Jharkhand.2. Salma Khatoon. ... ... ...Opp. Parties ---------- CORAM: THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE D.N.UPADHYAY For the Petitioner: Mr. R.S.Mazumdar, Sr. Advocate. For the State: A.P.P. For the O.P.No.2: Mr. S.B. Laik, Advocate. ---------- 04/ 19.12.2012 Report received from the Mediator indicates that mediation failed. Learned Counsel for the petitioner prays for time to seek instructions from his client as to why the mediation failed. Put up this case on 3rd January, 2013. Till then, interim order granted earlier shall continue. [D.N.Upadhyay,J.] P.K.S....
Rabidnra Kerketta and ors. Vs. Jharkhand State Electricity Bo
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Dec-19-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P (S) No. 10 of 2007 Rabindra Kerketta & others Petitioner Versus Jharkhand State Electricity Board & others Respondents ---------- CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE APARESH KUMAR SINGH For the Petitioner : Mrs. Ritu Kumar For the Respondent : Mr. P.K.Deomani, S.C. ----------- I.A No. 1751 o06. /19.12.2012 Counsel for the petitioner does not intend to press this interlocutory application. Accordingly, I.A. No. 1751 of 2007 is disposed of as not pressed. W.P (S) No. 10 of 2007 List this writ petition under the heading of admission in the second week of January, 2013. (Aparesh Kumar Singh, J.) A. Mohanty...
- ‹ Prev
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 19
- 20
- 21
- Next ›
- Last »