Jharkhand Court December 2012 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Bihar Jharkhand Sales Represen Vs. Hindustan Antiboitic Limited and
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Dec-19-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.L. No. 1026 of 2011 Bihar Jharkhand Sales Representative Union ......Petitioner Versus Hindustan Antibiotic Limited & Ors. .Respondents ----- Coram:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA NATH TIWARI For the Petitioner : None ----- I.A. No. 2073/2012 03/19.12.2012 No one appears on call to press this application. This application is, accordingly, rejected for non prosecution. ( Narendra Nath Tiwari, J) Rakesh/...
Ram Prasad Halwai Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Dec-19-2012
1 INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI Cr.M.P.No.1984of2012 RamPrasadHalwai Petitioner Versus 1.StateofJharkhand 2.SudhirBesra 3.SukhdeoBesra 4.KameshwarBesra 5.RasikBesra 6.NareshBesra 7.IliyasMian 8.AsruddinMian ... ... ... Opp.Parties CORAM: HON'BLEMR.JUSTICED.N.PATEL HON'BLEMR.JUSTICEPRASHANTKUMAR ForthePetitioners: Mr.M.B.Lal FortheRespondent: Mr.PankajKumar,A.P.P. 04/Dated:19thDecember,2012 PerD.N.Patel,J1) The present application has been preferred under 378(4) of the CodeofCriminalProcedureforgettingSpecialLeavetoAppealagainstthe judgmentandorderdated17thJuly2012passedbythelearnedJudicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Dhanbad in Complaint Case No.1998 of 2007 wherebythecomplaintcasefiledbythepetitionerhasbeendismissed.2) Thecomplaintcasewasfiledbythecomplainantpetitionerbefore the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Dhanbad for allegedly committing an offence under Sections 147/341/427/447/379/34 of the Indian Penal Code against Opposite Party Nos. 2 to 8. The case of the complainant petitioner,a...
Md Tippu Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Dec-19-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 3421 of 2012 Md. Tippu .... Petitioner(s) Versus State of Jharkhand ... Opposite Party Coram : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE D.N.UPADHYAY For the petitioner (s): Mr. For the opposite party : Addl.P.P. 19.12.2012 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the State. This is an application for grant of anticipatory bail filed by the petitioner in connection with Chhattarpur PS case No. 88 of 2011 for the offence registered under section 395 of the Indian Penal Code. This is a case of road robbery and the accused persons have looted passers-by. During investigation, one of the looted mobile was recovered from possession of Sunil Kumar who disclosed that the said mobile phone was given to him by his Master . It is submitted that the statement of petitioner was recorded in the case diary and he was examined under sections 161 and 164 Cr.P. C. He has made it clear that he runs a mobile shop and the disputed mobile was giv...
Md.Farid Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Dec-19-2012
INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI C.M.P.No.359of2010 Md.Farid Petitioner Versus TheStateofJharkhandandothers... ... ... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLEMR.JUSTICED.N.PATEL HON'BLEMR.JUSTICEPRASHANTKUMAR ForthePetitioner : Mr.MithileshSingh FortheRespondent: Mr.J.C.toA.G. OrderNo.5/Dated:19 th December2012 PerD.N.Patel,J1) Counsel appearing for the petitioner upon instruction from his client submittedthatheisnotpressingthisapplication.2) Inviewofthesubmission,thisC.M.P.isdisposedofasnotpressedatthis stage. (D.N.Patel,J) (PrashantKumar,J) Raman/Binit...
Haris Chandra Ram Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors.
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Dec-19-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (S) No. 2182 of 2004 --- Haris Chandra Ram --- --- --- ---- Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand & others --- ---- --- Respondents --- CORAM: The Honble Mr. Justice Aparesh Kumar Singh For the Petitioners: None For the State: JC to AAG --- 06/ 19.12.2012 No one appears on behalf of the petitioner. Earlier also, no one has been appearing on behalf of the petitioner and the matter was being adjourned, in the interest of justice, to be listed after five weeks. Even today, no one appears on behalf of the petitioner. Counsel for the respondent State is present. In that view of the matter, since today no one appears on behalf of the petitioner, the writ petition is dismissed for default. (Aparesh Kumar Singh, J) Ranjeet/...
Jalil Ansari Vs. Chairman J.S.E.B., Ranchi and or
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Dec-19-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(S) No. 581 of 2012 Jalil Ansari ..... Petitioner Versus The Chairman, J.S.E.B., Ranchi & Ors. . Respondents CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH For the Petitioner : Mr. A.K. Pathak, Advocate For the Respondents : Mr. Shailendra Kumar, J.C. to A.A.G. ----- 7 /19.12.2012 I.A. No. 1430 of 2012 By way of present interlocutory application, petitioner seeks amendment in the writ petition. Amendment, as sought for by the petitioner, seems to be justified for the fair adjudication of the case. For the reasons stated in the interlocutory application, I.A. No.1430 of 2012 is allowed. W.P.(S) No. 581 of 2012 Let the amended writ petition be placed on record on or before 10th January, 2013 with advance copy to the learned counsel for the Respondents. Counter affidavit, to the amended writ petition, may be filed within four weeks. Rejoinder, if any, may be filed within four weeks thereafter. (Alok Singh, J.) R.K....
Md Hir Alias Hirwa Alias Md Issad Alias Issadhir Vs. the State of Jhar ...
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Dec-19-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 8315 of 2012. --- 1. Md. Hira @Hirwa @ Md Issad @ Issadhir 2. Rupesh Mallah @ Rupesh Mahalla ... ... Applicants Versus The State of Jharkhand ... ... Opposite party. --- CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH --- For the Applicant : Mr. Sanjay Prasad, Advocate. For the Opposite Party : Mr. A.K. Panday, A.P.P. --- 03/19.12.2012 Mr. Sanjay Prasad, learned counsel for the applicants submits that trial has not been committed as yet, therefore, order dated 06.12.2012 be modified to the extent that the applicants shall be released to the satisfaction of Shri S.K. Dubey, Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class, Dhanbad in connection with Chirkunda (Maithen ) P.S. Case No. 238 of 2011, correspondig to G.R. No. 3837 of 2011. Order accordingly. (Alok Singh, J.) Brajesh....
Smt.Saraswati Singh Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Dec-19-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(S) No. 4665 of 2010 Smt. Saraswati Singh ..... Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand through its Secretary 2. Secretary, Social Services, Women & Child Development Department, Project Bhawan, Ranchi 3. Director, Secondary Education, Project Building, Dhurwa, Ranchi . Respondents CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH For the Petitioner : M/s. Mukesh Kr. Sinha, Abir Chatterjee, Vivek Kumar, Vivek Agarwal, Advocates For the Respondents : Mr. Mukesh Kumar Sinha, Advocate ----- 07 /19.12.2012 Learned counsel for the parties submit that the present case is squarely covered by the Judgment of this Court passed in W.P.(S) No. 3942 of 2012, Asha Kumari Pathak Versus The State of Jharkhand & others dated 30.08.2012, therefore, the present writ petition may be disposed of in the same terms. Order accordingly. (Alok Singh, J.) R.K....
Basant Mahto Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Dec-19-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 3455 of 2012 Basant Mahato .... Petitioner(s) Versus State of Jharkhand ... Opposite Party Coram : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE D.N.UPADHYAY For the petitioner (s): Mr.A. Banerjee For the opposite party : None 19.12.2012 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the State. This is an application for grant of anticipatory bail filed by the petitioner in connection with Excise case No. . 13 of 2012 pending in the court of learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Bermo at Tenughat. It reveals from seizure list that 2000 kg of jawa Mahua and 280 litres of Mahua liquor have been recovered from the place belonging to the petitioner. It is submitted that the petitioner has no concern with the place from where incriminating articles were seized. He has committed no offence. Learned counsel for the State has opposed the prayer. Considering nature of the offence and recovery of illicit Mahua and liquor, I do not find it a fi...
Bhadwa Oraon Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Dec-19-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 8507 of 2012 Bhadwa Oraon ..... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand . Opposite Party CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H. C. MISHRA For the Petitioner :Mr. Abhay Kr. Chaturvedy For the State :A. P.P. ----- 06/19.12.2012 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the Prosecution. Petitioner has been made accused for the offence under Sections 366 of the Indian Penal Code and the Charge Sheet has been submitted under Section 376 IPC, in connection with Sisai (Bharno) P.S. Case No. 119 of 2011, corresponding to G.R. No. 391 of 2011 (S. T. No. 119 of 2012). There being direct allegation against the petitioner to have abducted and kidnapped the wife and children of the informant and from the statement of the victim lady, it transpired that she was subjected to rape by this petitioner on several occasions, the prayer for bail of the petitioner was earlier rejected on merits vide order dated 06.01.2012 in B. A. No. 8942 of 20...
- ‹ Prev
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 21
- Next ›
- Last »