Jharkhand Court December 2012 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Hiro Ram Alias Hero Ram Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Dec-19-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 8710 of 2012 Hiro Ram @ Hero Ram ..... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand . Opposite Party CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H. C. MISHRA For the Petitioner :Mr. Jyoti Prasad Sinha For the State :A. P.P. ----- 03/19.12.2012 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the Prosecution. Petitioner has been made accused for the offence under Sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 307, 332, 353, 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code, Section 17 C.L.A. Act, Sections 3, 4, 5 of the Explosive Substance Act and Section 27 of the Arms Act, in connection with Bishnugrah P.S. Case No. 08 of 2008, corresponding to G.R. No. 173 of 2008 (S. T. No. 227A of 2010). From the F.I.R., it appears that though the petitioner is named in the F.I.R. and there was an encounter between the Police party and the members of the extremist group, but the extremists however, managed to flee away and it also appears that no one has injured in the Police side. In the fa...
Bibha Sinha Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Dec-19-2012
INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI W.P.(S)No.6312of2010 BibhaSinha ... Petitioner Versus TheStateofJharkhand&Ors. ... ... ... Respondents CORAM: HONBLEMR.JUSTICEALOKSINGH ForthePetitioner :None FortheState :None I.A.No.194of2011 03/19.12.2012 Thisisanapplicationseekingpermissiontointerveneinthepresent petition. Applicant being outsider is not a necessary and proper party and cannotbepermittedtointerveneinthedisputeintersebetweenthepetitioner andthedepartment. Consequently,I.A.No.194of2011isrejected. (AlokSingh,J.) Manish...
Bhima Charan Maity Vs. Damodar Valley Corporation and O
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Dec-19-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W. P. (S) No. 6248 of 2003 Bhima Charan Maity Petitioner -V e r s u s- Damodar Valley Corporation (D.V.C.) through its Chairman and Ors. Respondents. CORAM: - HONBLE MR. JUSTICE APARESH KUMAR SINGH. For the Petitioner : - None. For the Respondents : - Mr. Tapas Kabiraj, Advocate 09/19.12.2012 No one appears on behalf of the petitioner. However, counsel for the respondent-DVC is present. It appears that on the last two dates, no one appeared on behalf of petitioner and the case was adjourned in the interest of justice. However, today also, no one appears on behalf of the petitioner, the writ petition is dismissed for default. (Aparesh Kumar Singh, J.) Kamlesh/Tanuj...
Shilu Rani Das Vs. Jharkhand State Electricity Bo
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Dec-19-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI WP(S) No. 6510 of 2006 ---- Shilu Rani Das ... Petitioner -Versus- JSEB & ors. ... Respondents ---- CORAM : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE APARESH KUMAR SINGH ---- For the Petitioner :Mr. A.K.Jha For the Respondents :M/s A.K.Pandey & Rohit. ---- 12- 19.12.2012 Counsel for the petitioner, after obtaining the latest instruction from his client, submits that the grievances of the petitioner have been redressed, as all admissible dues, as claimed by her, have already been paid. Accordingly, this writ petition stands disposed of as having become infructuous. (Aparesh Kumar Singh, J.) Pandey...
Md Mustafa and ors Vs. Collectariate
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Dec-19-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI. W.P. (C) No. 4026 of 2012 Md. Mustafa & Others Petitioners -V e r s u s- The State of Jharkhand & Others Respondents. CORAM: - HONBLE MR. JUSTICE P.P. BHATT. For the Petitioners : - Mr. Ayush Aditya, Advocate. For the Respondent-State : - Mr. Arvind Kumar Mehta, J.C. to S.C. (Mines). 02/19.12.2012 The petitioners, by way of the present petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, have prayed for issuance of an appropriate writ/order/direction for quashing and setting aside the order dated 05.06.2012 (Annexure-10), passed by the learned Subordinate Judge-I, Godda in Title Suit No. 71 of 2012 (Annexure-4).2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned counsel for the State 3. Perused the papers.4. The learned counsel for the petitioners pointed out by referring Annexure-1, 2 and 3 to the writ petition, that the petitioners approached this Court by way of filing C.W.J.C. Nos. 10410, 10387 & 10389 of 1999(R). Initially...
Dashrath Kumar Tigga Alias Ajay Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Dec-19-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 3772 of 2012 Dashrath Kumar Tigga @ Ajay... ... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand ... ... ... Opposite Party --- CORAM : HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE JAYA ROY For the Petitioner : Mr. Mohit Prakash, Advocate For the State : A. P. P. For the Informant : Mr. Md. Kaisar Alam, Advocate 03/19.12.2012 Put up this case on 15.01.2013 under the same heading. In the meantime the State counsel will file counter affidavit and produce the case diary on that very date. Till that date, the police will not arrest the petitioner, namely, Dashrath Kumar Tigga @ Ajay in connection with Ghaghra P.S. Case No. 38 of 2012 corresponding to G.R. No. 518 of 2012, pending in the Court of Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Gumla. Learned counsel for the petitioner will deposit the cost of the Fax to communicate this order to the court concerned/authority concerned. (Jaya Roy, J.) Satayendra...
Arun Kumar Yadav Alias Arun Yadav Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Dec-19-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B. A. No 8803 of 2012 --- Arun Kumar Yadav @ Arun Yadav ... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand Opposite Party --- CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH --- For the Petitioner : Ms. Vani Kumari, Advocate For the Opposite Party : Ms. Prem Prakash, A.P.P. --- 02 /19.12.2012 Present Bail application is moved seeking regular bail in connection with Bishungarh P.S. Case No.88 of 2009, corresponding to G.R. No.2138 of 2009 registered under Sections 144/386 of the Indian Penal Code read with section 17 of the C.L.A. Act. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that as per the prosecution story, on receiving secret information that some of the people are planning for the extortion of levy, a raid was conducted in the house of Chhotan Gupta, during which, 10-12 persons were started fleeing away from his house, out of which, one of the them was intercepted by the police party, who disclosed his name as Mukesh Kumar Gupta @ Chhotan and also disclo...
Ratan Kumar Sinha Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Dec-19-2012
1 INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI Cr.M.P.No.1476of2011 RatanKumarSinha Petitioner Versus 1.TheStateofJharkhand 2.AnilKumarJain 3.KalpanaJain 4.SubratoBanerjee ... ... ... Opp.Parties CORAM: HON'BLEMR.JUSTICED.N.PATEL HON'BLEMR.JUSTICEPRASHANTKUMAR ForthePetitioner : Mr.DilipKumarPrasad FortheOpp.Parties: Mr.V .S.Sahay,A.P.P. OrderNo.5/Dated:19 th December2012 PerD.N.Patel,J1) Thepresentapplicationhasbeenpreferredunder378oftheCode of Criminal Procedure for getting Special Leave to Appeal against the judgment and order dated 06.08.2011 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate,1stClass,RanchiinComplaintCaseNo.168of2007/T.R.No. 620of2011wherebythecomplaintcasefiledbythepetitionerhasbeen dismissed.2) Thecomplaintcasewasfiledbythecomplainantpetitioner before the Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Ranchi for allegedly committing an offenceunderSections469/471/120BoftheIndianPenalCode against theOppositePartyNos.2to4.Itisallegedthatpetitionerandhisfamily members having made interpolation in th...
Kaushalya Infrastructure Development Corporation Limited Vs. Road Cons ...
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Dec-19-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.C. No. 4220 of 2012 Kaushalya Infrastructure Development Corporation Limited ......Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand & Ors. .Respondents ----- Coram:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA NATH TIWARI For the Petitioner : Mr. Ajay Kumar, Advocate For the State : JC to AG. ----- 07/19.12.2012 Learned JC to AG submitted that the counter affidavit is in process and it is expected to be filed within a couple of days. For that purpose, he prays for two weeks' time. Prayer is allowed. Put up this case on 22.01.2013. Till then, the interim order dated 24.09.2012 shall continue. ( Narendra Nath Tiwari, J) Rakesh/...
Amarnath Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Dec-19-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No.3729 of 2012 ---- Amarnath .... ... ... .... Petitioner ---Versus--- The State of Jharkhand & Anr. .........Opposite Parties ---- CORAM: HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE JAYA ROY ---- For the Petitioner : Mr. Pratiush Lala, Advocate For the State : A.P.P. ---- 3 / 19.12.2012 Issue notice to the opposite party no.2 by registered post with A/D as well as under ordinary process, for which requisites etc must be filed by 7 th January, 2013, failing which, this application shall stand rejected without further reference to the Bench. Till further order, police will not arrest the petitioner namely Amarnath in connection with the present case i.e. C.P.Case No.747 of 2011, pending in the court of Judicial Magistrate, Dhanbad. ( Jaya Roy, J.) SI/...
- ‹ Prev
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- Next ›
- Last »