Jharkhand Court January 2012 Judgments
Shalkhan Murmoo Vs. the State of Jharkhand and Others
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jan-25-2012
1. Heard counsel for the parties. 2. The writ petitioner is a former Member of Lok Sabha. However, according to learned Advocate General, the writ petitioner was never a Member from any constituency of the State of Jharkhand and he was a Member of Lok Sabha from the State of Orissa. Be that as it may, the writ petitioner has prayed for a declaration that holding of the post of Chief Minister by Sri Arjun Munda, respondent no.7, and of the post of Minister of Revenue and Land Reforms by Sri Mathura Mahto, respondent no.8, is completely unconstitutional, illegal and in violation of the oath of office taken by them as prescribed in the IIIrd Schedule of the Constitution of India and further prayed for a declaration that in view of the blatant violation of the Constitution and stopping and frustrating enforcement of law, the aforesaid respondent nos.7 and 8 are not entitled to continue in the office even for a day. 3. In the writ petition, it has been stated that one order was issued on 4t...
Tag this Judgment!The State of Jharkhand and Others Vs. Shailendra Kumar Sinha
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jan-18-2012
Learned counsel for the petitioner-respondent now agreed that a direction may be issued to the Registering Authority to pass appropriate order; either to register the document or pass appropriate order refusing to register the document which should be in accordance with law and the pleas which are not available in law may not be taken into account by the Registering Authority and should not be decided under influence by the reply filed by the State. Since, for registration of a document the competent authority is Registrar/Sub-Registrar of the area, who is required to take a decision with respect to registration of the document and even higher authorities directions can be ignored and without knowing the reasons for refusal to register the documents, the challenge cannot be made and in our opinion, directing the Registering Authority to register the document will be usurping the power of the said authority. Therefore, in view of the statement of the petitioners, it is ordered that the ...
Tag this Judgment!M/S. Hotel Woodland Vs. Jharkhand State Electircity Board and Others
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jan-05-2012
1. The appellant is aggrieved against the judgment dated 18.3.2004 passed in W.P (C) No.1467/2004 as the learned Single Judge upheld the order passed by the Consumer Grievance Redressal Forum, Jharkhand State Electricity Board, Ranchi, in Consumer Case No.21/2003, by which the Consumer Redressal Forum refused to quash the letter dated 20.1.2004 issued by the Electrical Executive Engineer, Electric Supply Circle, Dhanbad, raising a bill to the tune of Rs.7,03,955/-. 2. According to learned counsel for the appellant, in the premises in question, an electrical connection was already there prior to its purchase of the premises in the year 1986. In the year 1986 itself, the appellant applied for conversion of the said connection from one phase to three phase connection and deposited the requisite fees on 10.2.1986. Thereafter the estimated cost was assessed on 12.3.1986. In the said assessment, it was clearly disclosed that at that time, applied load was 8 KW. The appellant was accordingly ...
Tag this Judgment!Ravindra Kumar Tiwary Vs. Smt. Anandi Tiwari
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jan-05-2012
P.P. Bhatt, J. 1. Heard the learned counsel for the appellant and the Respondent. 2. Perused the records and the proceedings. 3. The present appeal is preferred by the appellant/defendant being aggrieved and dissatisfied with the Judgment and Decree dated 20th February, 2009 passed in Matrimonial Suit no. 237 of 2005 by the Principal judge, Family Court, Jamshedpur whereby the suit for dissolution of marriage by a decree of divorce has been dismissed. 4. The facts of the case, in brief are as follows :- The appellant filed a petition under section 13 (i-a) (i-b) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 before the Court of Principal Judge, Family Court, Jamshedpur for dissolution of his marriage with the respondent namely Smt. Anandi Tiwari by a decree of divorce. The suit was registered as Matrimonial Suit No. 237/2005. The Marriage of the Appellant with the respondent was solemnized on 13/7/1997 at Jamshedpur and thereafter, both lived as husband and wife in the house of the appellant. On 21.7...
Tag this Judgment!- ‹ Prev
- Next ›