Jharkhand Court May 2011 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Deepak Kumar Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand Ranchi
Decided on: May-13-2011
1. Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner andLearned A.P.P. appearing for the State.The petitioner is an accused in a case instituted under Section379 of Indian Penal Code.2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that sincethe petitioner was found in possession of stolen motorcar at PatnaRailway Station, a case was registered under Section 414 IndianPenal Code, in which petitioner has already been granted bail byPatna High Court, but the petitioner has moved for bail before thisCourt as he has been made an accused in a case registered underSection 379 of the Indian Penal Code for theft of the said car, butthere has been absolutely no material to show that the petitioner hadhad any role to play in the commission of offence of theft.Regard being had to the facts and circumstances of the case,the above named Petitioner is directed to be released on bail onFurnishing bail bond of Rs. 10000/(Ten Thousand) with two Sureties of the like amount each to the satisfacti...
Deobrat Mishra Vs. the State of Bihar Now Jharkhand and ors.
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: May-13-2011
1. CAV on 10th May,2011 Delivered on 13th May, 2011 Prakash Tatia,J. This letters patent appeal has been preferred by the writ petitioner to challenge the judgment dated 12th September, 2003 passed by the learned Single Judge of this Court in C.W.J.C. No. 567 of 1994, by which the writ petition of the petitioner has been dismissed.2. The brief facts of the case are that according to the petitioner his father late Prafulla Chandra Mishra got the land in question having plot nos.261,262 and 263 under Khata no.73 of village Barmasia, PS & district Giridih by raiayati settlement through a customary Hukumnama executed by Gaibi Nath Mishra, Ex-landlord on 18th Magh,1341 Fasli, corresponding to the year 1934 A.D. The petitioner's ancestors remained in possession since then and thereafter petitioner came in possession of the property. The name of Prafulla Chandra Mishra was mentioned as raiyati in some of the records with respect to plot nos.261,262, 263 and 264 as the petitioner's ancestors u...
Sita Ram Singh Vs. the State of Jharkhand Opp. Party
Court: Jharkhand Ranchi
Decided on: May-12-2011
1.The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that though the allegation against the petitioners for demand of "Rangdhari" and also assaulting the informant but in the case diary there is no evidence that the petitioners have demanded any "Rangdhari" from the informant. The learned counsel for the State Mr. Shekhar Sinha has submitted that the material has come that they have assaulted the informant and also snatched his wrist watch.2. The criminal antecedent report of the petitioners has come which shows that the petitioners have no criminal antecedent. Considering all these facts, I direct the petitioners to surrender in the court below within a period of four weeks from the date of this order and if they surrender, the court below is directed to enlarge the petitioners, above named, on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Deoghar in connection with Jasidih P. S. case No. 195 of 2...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- Next ›