Jharkhand Court June 2009 Judgments
Anosh Ekka Vs. State Through Vigilance Bureau and ors.
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jun-29-2009
Reported in: 2010CriLJ259
R.R. Prasad, J.1. The question which has been raised in this application is as to whether the Special Judge, Vigilance does have power at all to refer the complaint under Section 156(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure for institution of a first information report and its investigation 2. The facts giving rise this application are that the complainant- respondent No. 7 lodged a complaint case before the learned Special Judge, Vigilance, Ranchi alleging therein that the petitioner (the then Minister, Government of Jharkhand) has acquired the assets disproportionate to his known source of income which allegation was based on the news item published in the daily Hindi Newspaper the 'Prabhat Khabar'; paper cutting of which was also annexed with the complaint petition. On receiving the complaint, learned Special Judge, vide its order dated 24.11.2008 referred the complaint under Section 156(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure to the Vigilance Police Station Ranchi for institution of a fir...
Tag this Judgment!Brahmi Impex Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jun-26-2009
Reported in: AIR2010Jhar31
ORDERAjit Kumar Sinha, J.1. The present writ petition has been preferred for the following reliefs:A. For issuance of an appropriate writ and / or writs of and / or in the nature of Mandamus commanding respondent Nos. 1 to 7 to declare that the application of petitioner No. 1 for grant of prospecting license for mining the Ankua Iron Ore Mines has been made on 20th March 2007 and not on 28th March 2007,B. For issuance of an appropriate writ and / or writs or and / or in the nature of Mandamus commanding respondent Nos. 1 to 7 to declare that the application of petitioner No. 1 for grant of prospecting license for mining the Ankua Iron Ore Mines has been made within time and for a direction upon the said respondents to consider and allow the same,C. For issuance of an appropriate writ and / or writs of and / or in the nature of Mandamus commanding respondent Nos. 3 to 7 to recommend the case of petitioner No. 1 to respondent Nos. 1 and 2 for grant of prospecting lease for mining the Ank...
Tag this Judgment!- ‹ Prev
- Next ›