Jharkhand Court January 2009 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Sanwariya Sarkar Jha Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors.
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jan-22-2009
Reported in: 2009(57)BLJR1106
D.G.R. Patnaik, J.1. Petitioner in this writ application has prayed for the issuance of a mandamus commanding upon the respondents to admit the petitioner to the B.Ed. Course for the Sessions 2008-09 at the A.S. Mahavidyalaya, Deoghar, which is a constituent college of the Sidhu Kanhu University, Dumka, against vacant general seats/unfilled reserved seats.2. The petitioner had appeared at the competitive test which was held by the respondent college for selection of candidates for admission to the B.Ed. courses in the College. By the first merit list published on 9.8.2008, the petitioner was declared successful and was placed at serial No. 8 in the merit list against the subject of Hindi. He received a letter from the respondent college asking him to deposit the requisite fees and other documents for admission to the aforesaid course in between 12.8.2008 to 20.8.2008.A notice was published by the college on 14.8.2008 cancelling the merit list published on 9.8.2008. Subsequently, by let...
Ram Prasad Sahu Vs. Pandey Giri and anr.
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jan-22-2009
Reported in: 2009CriLJ3768
Jaya Roy, J.1. Heard learned Counsel for the appellant.2. The complainant-appellant has filed the instant appeal for setting aside the impugned judgment dated 10th April, 1996 passed by Sri Dinesh Prasad Singh, Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class, Ranchi in complaint case no, 274 of 1993 corresponding to Trial No. 553 of 1996 after granting leave by this Court.3. The complaint case in brief is that the appellant has entered into an agreement with the respondent for sale of his house for which a cheque was issued on 04.04.1993 amounting to Rs. 3,000/- by the respondent which was dishonoured by the bank due to insufficient amount in the account. An Advocate notice was sent on 04.09.1993 by registered post with A/D, but no amount was deposited or sent by the respondent to him. Hence, this case was filed. The complainant examined three witnessed in this case including himself as PW 1.PW 2. Pradip Kumar Mukherjee, a formal witness who proved the notice dated 04.09.1993 and PW 3, Bipin Kumar, Deo...
Sikander Pandey, Vs. the State of Jharkhand and ors.
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jan-22-2009
Reported in: 2009(57)BLJR1121
ORDERAjit Kumar Sinha, J.1. The present writ petition has been preferred for the following reliefs:i) For issuance of an appropriate, writ/order or direction from this Hon'ble Court directing the concerned respondents to show cause as to why and under what authority the concerned respondents have provided appointments to Sri Chandreshekhar Prasad and Krishna Ballav Kumar (respondent Nos. 7 & 8 respectively) out of the panel dated 6.7.1994 ignoring the cases of the petitioners whose position is much higher than that of respondent Nos. 7 & 8 in the said panel,ii) For issuance of a further writ/order or direction for canceling the appointment of the respondent Nos. 7 & 8,iii) For issuance of a further writ/order/direction directing the concerned respondents to immediately and forthwith without any further delay give appointment to the petitioners whose position is much higher in the said panel.2. The facts in brief are set out as under:In the year 1986 respondent Nos. 7 & 8 along with oth...
K.D. Liquor and Fertilizer (Pvt.) Ltd. Through Its Authorised Represen ...
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jan-22-2009
Reported in: [2009(1)JCR616(Jhr)]
R.K. Merathia and Prashant Kumar, JJ.1. This Letters Patent Appeal has been filed against the order dated 14.7.2005 passed by the learned Single Judge in W.P. (C) No. 3726 of 2005, whereby the writ petition filed by the appellant was dismissed.2. The said writ petition was filed by the appellant for a direction on the respondents to charge license fee @ Rs. 1/- per L.P. litre in respect of country liquor for the extended period upto 30.6.2005 and/or adjust the excess amount of license fee paid during the extended period.3. It appears that the appellant was granted contract for the whole sale supply of country liquor in Dhanbad Zone and Bokaro District in terms of Clause 2(Kha) of the tender notice (Annexure 1) under which the appellant was required to pay license fee @ Rs. 1/- per LP. litre. The contract expired on 31.3.2005. As some time was required for giving a fresh grant, the period of contract of the appellant was extended for two months by letter dated 29.3.2005 (Annexure 2), un...
Bharat Coking Coal Ltd. Through Its General Manager and ors. Vs. Md. A ...
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jan-22-2009
Reported in: [2009(1)JCR615(Jhr)]
R.K. Merathia and Prashant Kumar, JJ.1. This Letters Patent Appeal has been filed by M/s. Bharat Coking Coal Limited-Management against the order dated 25.8.2005 passed by the learned Single Judge in WP (S) No. 4050 of 2004 allowing the writ petition filed by the respondent and remitting the case to the appellants to consider his case for appointment on compassionate ground taking into consideration the previsions of 'The persons with Disabilities (Equal Opportunities, Protection of Rights and Full Participation) Act, 1995' (hereinafter referred to as '1995 Act').2. Mr. Amit Kumar Sinha, learned Counsel appearing for the appellants submitted that Section 33 of 1995 Act applies to regular appointment and not the appointment to be made as per the provision of National Coal Wage Agreement-VI (hereinafter to be referred to as 'N.C.W.A.'). He further submitted that it is not practicable also to apply Section 33 of 1995 Act in such appointment to be made on compassionate ground. He further s...
Raman Lohra Vs. the State of Bihar (Now Jharkhand)
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jan-22-2009
Reported in: 2009(57)BLJR1405
1. This appeal is directed against the judgment of conviction and order of sentence passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Gumla in Sessions Trial No. 289/93 whereby and whereunder he convicted the appellant under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced him to undergo life imprisonment.2. The case of prosecution in short is as per the fardbeyan of the informant P.W.-5 is that on 23.04.1992, the appellant, his father Ratiya Lohra and wife Kariyo Devi were in their house. On 24.04.1992 at about 3:00 P.M., he saw that the house of deceased Ratiya Lohra was closed from outside. It is further stated that later on the informant and other villagers opened the door and entered inside the house and they found that Ratiya Lohra, one of the deceased, was lying on the ground in unconscious condition whereas another deceased namely, Kariyo Devi was lying dead on a mat. It is further alleged that the informant and other villagers had found injury and thereafter they had been removed to hos...
Soma Munda Vs. the State of Bihar (Now Jharkhand)
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jan-22-2009
Reported in: 2009(57)BLJR1403
1. This appeal is directed against the judgment of conviction and sentence dated 15.12.1994 by Smt. Shakuntala Sinha, Additional Judicial Commissioner, Khunti by which, it was found that the Appellant and one Karam Singh Munda, since deceased were guilty Under Section 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code, sentenced both of them to life imprisonment. This appeal has been preferred by Soma Munda.2. The prosecution case in short is that on 17.06.1992, the informant, P.W.1, Kitni Mundain lodged an F.I.R. to police that at about 5.30 P.M. in the evening while she along with her husband were grazing cattle in village Bandadih, then her brother accused Soma Munda along with Karam Singh Munda came and assaulted her husband with 'Dauli' causing his death. In her fardbayan, she has stated that there was a dispute with her Husband and her brother with regard to some jungle land and her brother was demanding 'Chanda' to file a case which, due to poverty, her husband could not gave. She returned to her ...
Mosstt Gyanu Sharma Vs. Hari Ram Sharma and ors.
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jan-21-2009
Reported in: [2009(1)JCR563(Jhr)]
D.G.R. Patnaik, J.1. The petitioner in this writ application under Article 227 of the Constitution of India has prayed for setting aside the order dated 12.02.2008 passed by the learned Sub Judge-I, Chaibasa in Title Partition Suit No. T.S.(P) No. 8 of 2006 by which a prayer made by the petitioner/defendant for extension of time to enable her to file her written statement, has been rejected and the petitioner has been debarred from filing the written statement.2. Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and learned Counsel for the Respondents.3. Sri M.K. Dey, learned Counsel for the petitioner by referring to the copies of the various orders of the Trial Court records, wants to impress that the petitioner had filed her appearance in the proceeding on 21.11.2007 and on that date she had submitted two separate prayers. One of the prayers being for recalling the order dated 06.11.2006 by which the proceeding was posted for hearing ex-parte against the petitioner and the other being a pray...
Kiran Paswan Vs. the State of Bihar (Now Jharkhand)
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jan-21-2009
Reported in: 2009(57)BLJR1400
1. This appeal is directed against the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 22.5.1999 and 24.5.1999 respectively passed by learned Sessions Judge at Dhanbad in S.T. No. 9 of 1998 convicting the appellant under Section 304(B)/34 of the Indian Penal Code.2. The case of the prosecution in short is as follows: The fard beyan (Ext-3) was recorded at 11.30 A.M. on 22.8.1997 of Arjun Paswan (the informant, P.W. 5) that he got information from Rampati Dusadh that his niece (bhagni) Indu Devi was murdered by her in-laws whereupon he went to the place of her in-laws. He found his niece lying dead in the house. He enquired from Chandradeo Singh (co-accused) and father of the appellant about Indu Devi as to how she died on which he replied that her husband (the appellant) murdered her on that day at about 3 A.M. in the morning by throttling. It was further said that the informant's brother-in-law Suresh Prasad (P.W. 4) had married his daughter Indu Devi with appellant in March 1995 a...
Sudam Ghosh, Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors.
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jan-21-2009
Reported in: [2009(2)JCR335(Jhr)]
D.K. Sinha, J.1. These three appeals have been preferred against the judgment and order dated 28th August, 2008 passed in a batch of writ petitions wherein the petitioners had prayed for a direction to the respondents to pay them arrears of salary which were not paid during the intervening period in which they were out of service between the year 1984 and 2000. The learned Single Judge was pleased to dismiss the writ petitions in view of the observation of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in S.L.P.(C) No. 10051 of 1990 wherein the learned Judges of the Hon'ble Supreme Court had been pleased to observe that if there are vacancies and there are No trained teachers available, the untrained teachers, who were employed earlier would be reinstated in service, after subjecting them to the selection process and they are found suitable. The Hon'ble Supreme Court had further observed that if there are No vacancies, the untrained teachers would be empanelled according to their seniority and -would be ap...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- Next ›
- Last »