Jharkhand Court September 2008 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Raushan Kumar Ray Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-12-2008
Reported in: [2008(4)JCR618(Jhr)]
ORDERAjit Kumar Sinha, J.1. The petitioner has preferred this bail application No. 1863 of 2008 for grant of regular bail in connection with Latehar Police Station Case No. 44/2001 dated 25.4.2001 corresponding to G.R. No. 155/2001, registered under Sections 304-B, 498-A/34 of the Indian Penal Code and under Sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act which is pending in the Court of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Latehar.2. I have heard at length the arguments advanced on behalf of the petitioner as well as the State and have also considered the impugned order dated 14.2.2008 vide which the learned Sessions Judge, Latehar has rejected the prayer for bail.3. The present petition has been preferred by the brother-in-law (dewar) of the deceased. The counsel for the petitioner submits that he is innocent and has been falsely dragged and implicated belatedly in the present case. The main contention raised on behalf of the petitioner is that initially after investigating the po...
The State of Jharkhand Through Excise Commissioner, Govt. of Jharkhand ...
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-12-2008
Reported in: 2009(57)BLJR1715
1. This appeal has been preferred by the State of Jharkhand against the order dated 4.12.2007 passed by the learned Single Judge in W.P.(C) No. 2234 of 2007 alongwith W.P.(C) No. 2268 of 2007 whereby he was pleased to dismiss the writ petitions and thus upheld the order passed by the Member, Board of Revenue, wherein it was held that the respondent No. 2 was not liable to pay the licence fee for the period during which it had surrendered the licence for the country liquor shop.2. To appreciate the controversy, it is relevant to state that the respondent No. 2 had been granted licence for supply of country liquor along with supply of Indian Made Foreign Liquor (IMFL) and although the supply was to be made for a period of three years, there was a specific agreement between the parties that the licence would be renewed every year and licence fee for each year would be paid by the licensee. Admittedly, the respondent No. 2 used the licence for a period of two years in sofar as country liqu...
Sanjay Kumar Sinha Vs. the State of Jharkhand Through the Chief Secret ...
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-10-2008
Reported in: 2009(57)BLJR316; [2008(4)JCR257(Jhr)]
D.G.R. Patnaik, J.1. Petitioner's prayer in this writ application is for quashing the final results of the Second Combined Civil Services Examinations published in the local newspaper on 13.4.2008 (Annexure-6) by the Jharkhand Public Service Commission, Ranchi (respondent No. 5) and also a direction upon the respondents to produce before this Court the answer sheets of the petitioner bearing roll No. 1181100 and that of two other candidates namely, Rupesh Kumar Sinha bearing roll No. 1116172 and Ritesh Kumar Singh bearing roll No. 1102684 and to stay issuance of appointment letters, pursuant to the impugned results dated 13.4.2008, during the pendency of this writ application.2. The case of the petitioner in brief is that he is physically handicapped to the extent of 65%. In response to the advertisement issued by the respondent No. 5 inviting applications for the Second Combined Civil Services Examinations for recruitment in public service under the State of Jharkhand, petitioner has ...
Ramayan Prasad Singh Vs. the State of Bihar and ors.
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-10-2008
Reported in: [2008(4)JCR438(Jhr)]
D.G.R. Patnaik, J.1. Petitioner in this writ application has prayed for a direction commanding upon the respondent Nos. 1 and 2 in particular, to immediately and forthwith grant all pensionary benefits including the pension to the petitioner for his services rendered in the office of Deputy Commissioner, Dhanbad on and from 20.02.1961 till 31.05.1981 and also to direct the respondent Nos. 1 and 2 to pay the gratuity amount to the petitioner in respect of the services rendered by him during the period under the State of Bihar, now Jharkhand.2. The petitioner's case in brief is that he was appointed as a Lower Division Clerk and posted in the office of Deputy Commissioner, Dhanbad on 20.02.1961. In due course, he was granted promotion to the post of Upper Division Clerk with corresponding scale of pay on 05.07.1978. After implementation of the recommendation of the 4th Pay Revision Committee, his scale was enhanced on and from 01.04.1981. Later, on being selected to the post of Revenue I...
The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Jashoda Devi and ors.
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-10-2008
Reported in: 2009ACJ1825
1. Heard the counsel for the appellant-Insurance Company, learned Counsel appearing for the owner of the motor cycle as also the learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the claimants and with their consent both the appeals are disposed of at the admission stage itself.2. The appellant-Insurance Company has assailed the impugned judgment and award passed by Motor Vehicles Accident Claims Tribunal, Hazaribagh in Claim case No. 96/2002 whereby the Tribunal awarded compensation for the death of the deceased who was traveling on the two wheeler as a pillion rider.3. Undisputed facts, in brief, are that the deceased Binod Kumar Thakur along with one Mukesh Kumar Sahu was returning to their village on their motor cycle bearing No. JHO 2H-1443 and when they reached near St. Columbus College, Hazaribagh a Maruti Van dashed the motor cycle as a result of which both the occupants of the two wheeler sustained injuries and the pillion rider, Binod Kumar Thakur, ultimately died. The owner of the two ...
Dr. Fakir Chand Hembram @ Phakir Chand Hembram Vs. State of Jharkhand ...
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-10-2008
Reported in: [2008(4)JCR245(Jhr)]
ORDERD.G.R. Patnaik, J.1. Petitioner has renewed his prayer for anticipatory bail, which was earlier disposed by this Court vide order dated 6.6.2008 passed in ABA No. 1022 of 2008 with a direction to surrender himself before the Court below and to seek regular bail.2. Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned Counsel for the Vigilance.3. The case was registered against the petitioner for the offences under Sections 409, 420 and 120-B of the Indian Penal Code read with Section 13(2)(1)(D) of the Prevention of Corruption Act.4. The case registered on the basis of a complaint filed by the Dy. S.P. (Vigilance), Ranchi on 14.10.2004 relates to the purchase of medicines by the petitioner in between January 2002-October 2002 during his tenure as Assistant Chief Medical Officer.The allegation against the petitioner is that he had obtained supply of medicines from a sick company namely, M/s. South Eastern Surgical Company, Ranchi at rates much higher than what was approved by th...
Tara Pratap Ram and ors. Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors.
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-10-2008
Reported in: [2008(4)JCR274(Jhr)]
ORDERD.G.R. Patnaik, J.1. Petitioners, in this writ application, who were appointed on the post of constables in the Excise Department in between January, 1977 to February, 1980, have prayed for an appropriate writ in the nature of certiorari for quashing the Memo No. 827 dated 21.6.2007 (Annexure-2), by which promotion has been given to respondent Nos. 6 to 22 and further, for a direction upon the respondents to consider the case of the petitioners for their appointment on the post of Assistant Sub-Inspector (Excise) by promotion after giving relaxation in their age.2. The case of the petitioners is that on the bifurcation of the erstwhile State of Bihar, the services of the petitioners were placed under the State of Jharkhand. The petitioners are matriculates and above and posses the requisite qualifications. The contention of the petitioners is that by virtue of their educational qualifications and longstanding experience with unblemished service records, they were eligible for thei...
Country Cement Vs. Jharkhand State Electricity Board and ors.
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-10-2008
Reported in: [2008(4)JCR291(Jhr)]
ORDERD.G.R. Patnaik, J.1. The petitioner in this application has prayed for the following reliefs:(i) for quashing of the inspection report dated 28.6.2008 (Annexure-5) prepared by the officials of the respondent Board;(ii) to command upon the respondents to immediately and forthwith restore the power supply to the petitioner which was disconnected on 28.6.2008;(iii) for direction to the respondents to show cause as to why and on what basis loss of Rs. 43.03 lakhs as indicated in the FIR lodged against the petitioner, has been illegally calculated?(iv) for direction upon the respondents not to coerce the petitioner to pay the amount mentioned in the FIR towards the purported loss, unless the proceeding/process as laid down under Section 126 of the Indian Electricity Act, 2003 is undertaken and order of final assessment is passed.2. The petitioner is a consumer of HT electricity supplied by the respondent Jharkhand State Electricity Board for a total contract demand of 125 KVA. The peti...
Md. Nazim, Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors.
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-10-2008
Reported in: [2008(4)JCR279(Jhr)]
ORDERD.G.R. Patnaik, J.1. Since the facts and the issues involved in all these cases are identical, they are disposed of by this common order.2. The petitioners who are Teachers in different Secondary Schools, have sought for a direction upon the respondents to consider them for promotion to the post of the Headmaster on the ground that they have been working as the acting Headmasters or senior most Teachers of their respective Schools and were eligible for promotion to the post of Head master in terms of the provisions of Bihar Nationalized Secondary Schools (Service Conditions) Rules, 1983.3. Admittedly, the petitioners were appointed as Trained Graduate Assistant Teachers and have possessed Master Degree with Teachers' training Diploma. They were given selection Grade and some of them, even Super Selection Grade.4. The contention of the petitioners is that for the purposes of laying down the service conditions including the preparation of seniority list and promotion, rules were fra...
Synergy Polypacks Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Jharkhand State Electricity Board and ...
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-10-2008
Reported in: [2008(4)JCR282(Jhr)]
ORDERD.G.R. Patnaik, J.1. Prayer in this writ application is for issuance of an appropriate writ commanding the respondents to immediately and forthwith restore the power supply of the petitioner, which was disconnected on 14.6.2008. Further prayer has been made to direct the respondents not to force the petitioner to pay any amount as mentioned by them, in the FIR lodged against the petitioner.2. Petitioner is a consumer of electrical energy in the HTS category under Consumer No. NR-I/548, for a contract demand of 200 KVA since 10.10.2007. The petitioner used to pay monthly electric charges as per the bill raised on the basis of the meter readings. As per the usual practice every month a team of Board's Officials used to make periodical visits to the premises of the petitioner to check and verify the electric meters and such verification was done in the month of March, 2008.On 14.6.2008, the Board's Officials visited the petitioner's premises and inspected the electric meter installed...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- Next ›
- Last »