Jharkhand Court August 2008 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Tarun Modi Vs. State of Jharkhand and anr.
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-14-2008
Reported in: [2008(4)JCR337(Jhr)]
ORDERAmareshwar Sahay, J.1. Heard Mr. Pandey Neeraj Roy, learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr. Ram Subhag Singh, learned A.P.P. for the State.2. The prayer of the petitioner in this application is to quash the order dated 1,6.2000 passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate. Ranchi taking cognizance for the offence under Section 16(1)(a)(II) of the Prevention of food Adulteration Act as well as the order dated 9.4.2003 passed by the Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Ranchi, rejecting the prayer of the petitioner for dropping the case.3. Facts in short are that O.P. No. 2filed a prosecution report before the Chief judicial Magistrate, Ranchi against the accused persons including the petitioner alleging therein that on 23.12.1999 a sample of Kashmiri Mirch Powder was taken from the shop of the petitioner and on being chemically examined by the public analyst, it was found to be adulterated, since it contained oil soluble dye as adulterant. The prosecution report also contain...
Mohan Lal Gupta Vs. Bokaro Steel Plant Through Its Chairman-cum-managi ...
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-14-2008
Reported in: [2008(4)JCR341(Jhr)]
ORDERR.R. Prasad, J.1. It is the case of the petitioner that the petitioner's Firm, namely, M/s. Gurdit Mal & sons under an agreement dated 27.9.1972 was awarded with a work of excavation of Central Trench of Bhawnathpur Lime Stone Mines Project for deposit the spoil in dump sites and also sizing, carting and loading the useful lime stone in Railway Wagon at Bhawnathpur Railway siding.2. The petitioner in terms of the agreement executed the entire work by 5.9.1974 under the supervision and guidance of the concerned officials of the respondents-Company. As per terms of the agreement, petitioner's Firm was required to deposit 15% of the security amount initially and remaining security money was to be deducted out of running bills and as such the respondents realized total amount of Rs. 1,77,401/- towards security deposit. After completion of the work, the respondents did not take steps for preparation of the final bills and also withheld certain amount towards security deposit without an...
India KamIn and ors. Vs. the Central Coal Fields Ltd. and ors.
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-14-2008
Reported in: [2009(1)JCR107(Jhr)]
ORDERD.G.R. Patnaik, J.1. Petitioners in these writ petitions have prayed for issuance the issuance of a direction commanding upon the respondents to pay pension to the petitioners from the respective dates of their retirement in the year 1995, under the SFVRS scheme with interest at the rate of 12 per cent per annum.2. The petitioners were piece rated employees of the Central Coalfields Limited working under the Project Officer (respondent No. 5). After their retirement, they filed applications for employment of their wards and also for payment of their dues on account of Provident Fund (CMPF) and gratuity. Though payment of PF and gratuity was made to the petitioners, but inspite of settlement of pension in the year 1988, and filling up of the prescribed forms for payment of pension in 1999, there was no response from the respondents in this regard.3. It is further stated that the petitioners were members of the Family Pension Scheme and the amounts of contribution used to be deducte...
Ravi Uppal, Vs. State of Jharkhand and anr.
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-13-2008
Reported in: 2008(57)BLJR142
D.K. Sinha, J.1. The petitioners of both the Cr. Misc. Petitions have invoked the inherent jurisdiction of this Court under Section 482 Code of Criminal Procedure for quashment of the judgment dated 26.02.2003 passed by the Addl. Sessions Judge, F.T.C.-II, Dhanbad in Cr. Revision No. 40 of 2001 arising out of common order dated 24.08.2000 passed by Shri A.K. Singh, Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class in C.P. Case No. 617 of 2000.2. The prosecution case in short was that the complainant O.P. No. 2 Amitabh Kumar Srivastava in his complaint case No. 617 of 2000 presented before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Dhanbad against the petitioners of both the Cr. Misc. Petitions alleged that he was working as Commercial Manager in Balaji Coke Industries (Pvt.) Limited of Pachgarhi, Katras, Dhanbad engaged in trading of Hard Coke business. The complainant's company used to supply Hard Coke from Porbandar, Gujarat to Hindustan Zinc Limited, Rajasthan and for transportation of Hard Coke, his company need...
Kauleshwar Prajapati Vs. the State of Jharkhand and ors.
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-13-2008
Reported in: [2008(119)FLR238]; [2008(4)JCR342(Jhr)]
D.G.R. Patnaik, J.1. Prayer in this writ petition has been made for an appropriate writ in the nature of Mandamus commanding upon the respondents to consider the petitioner's case for appointment on compassionate ground and to pay his share in retiral dues and in the arrears of salary which was legally payable to his deceased father within a specified period.2. The petitioner's case is that his father was a permanent class-IV employee in the Soil Conservation Department under the respondents and was posted as Hazaribag. The petitioner's father was put under suspension on 18.9.1996. He challenged the said order of suspension in this Court by filing a writ petition being W.P.(S) No. 3057 of 2002 which was disposed of by order dated 5.9.2002 and order of suspension of petitioner's father was revoked, and respondents were directed to pay the arrears of subscription allowance to the petitioner's father after adjusting the maintenance allowance. It was further directed to pay the maintenance...
Jharkhand Yayayat Karmachari Welfare Swabalambi Sahkari Samity Ltd. Vs ...
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-13-2008
Reported in: [2008(4)JCR344(Jhr)]
ORDERD.G.R. Patnaik, J.1. In this writ application, petitioner has prayed for a writ in the nature of mandamus, commanding upon the respondents to consider the grievances of the petitioner as contained in its Representation dated 31.7.2007 (Annexure-9) and for entrustment and authorization of the petitioner's society to manage, maintain and implement the proposed plan of the bus-stand within a specified period.2. The claim of the petitioner is primarily based on an earlier order of this Court, passed on 21.4.1999 in C.W.J.C. No. 3619 of 1998 (R).3. The case of the petitioner, which is a Registered society, is that by a Notification issued by the Deputy Commissioner, Jamshedpur on 25.11.1998. the site of the existing bus stand was notified to be shifted to a new site, although the requisite facilities and amenities for passengers and others concerned were not created. Vide Order dated 21.4.1999, passed in the aforesaid writ application, which was filed by the petitioner against the impu...
Sacred Heart Convent School Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors.
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-13-2008
Reported in: [2008(4)JCR320(Jhr)]
M.Y. Eqbal, J.1. This appeal under Clause 10 of the Letters Patent is directed against the judgment and order dated 23.4.2008 passed in W.P. (C) No. 1913 of 2008 whereby the learned Single Judge disposed of the writ petition with a direction to the petitioners to put all his grievances before the Director, Secondary Education Government of Jharkhand, Ranchi, who shall look into the matter and pass necessary orders. For better appreciation, the judgment dated 23.4.2008 is quoted herein below:As prayed, petitioner is permitted to add the Director, Secondary Education, Government of Jharkhand, Ranchi, as party respondent No. 4, in course of the day.It is submitted by Mr. Indrajit Sinha, appearing for the petitioner, that the Government cannot interfere with the school of the petitioner, which is a Non Government Aided Minority School. He further submitted that no objection is to be obtained from the State Government only for the purpose of affiliation with ICSC Board and other than that S...
Kumari Sushma Prakash Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors.
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-13-2008
Reported in: [2008(4)JCR338(Jhr)]
ORDERD.G.R. Patnaik, J.1. In this writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari for quashing the part of the recommendation dated 3.9.2007 of District Collectariat, Garhwa (District Social Welfare) appearing at Serial No. 12 (contained in Annexure 2) whereby and whereunder the name of respondent No. 7 Smt. Saroj Devi has been approved for appointment on the post of Anganbari Sevika for Jhurha Tola, Anganbari Centre of village Baghaundha Iliyas of Gram Panchayat Ramna, District Garhwa, in spite of the fact that the name of the petitioner was earlier recommended by the Block Development Officer, Ramna for the aforesaid post.2. The case of the petitioner is that she is the daughter-in-law of the concerned village and is living in the village since after her marriage to one Roshan Prakash of the same village solemnized two years ago and she possesses the highest qualifications amongst the candidates who had applied for the post of Anganbari Sev...
Sushil Kumar Shukla Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors.
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-13-2008
Reported in: [2008(4)JCR442(Jhr)]
ORDER1. Heard the parties.2. The petitioner being the father of the girl Manisha Kumari @ Manisha Shukla has filed this application in the nature of habeas corpus for a direction the respondents for production of the body of his daughter Manisha Kumari @ Manisha Shukla who, according to him, has been abducted and kidnapped by the respondent Nos. 5 to 7.3. It is said that in spite of the lodging of the FIR being Kotwali (Sukhdev Nagar) P.S. Case No. 947/2007, registered under Sections 364/366-A/34 of the Indian Penal Code against the respondent Nos. 5 to 7, his daughter has not yet been recovered and the police has not yet been able to locate her whereabouts. The petitioner apprehends that there is serious threat on the life of his daughter at the hands of the respondent Nos. 5 to 7.4. A counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of the respondent Nos. 3 and 4 namely Superintendent of Police as well as the Officer Incharge of the Kotwali Police Station. In the counter affidavit, it is s...
Smt. Namita Roy Vs. the Union of India (Uoi) and Vijay Bhaskar
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-12-2008
Reported in: 2008(56)BLJR2716; (2008)218CTR(Jharkhand)666; [2009]308ITR109(Jharkhand); [2008(4)JCR364(Jhr)]
Amareshwar Sahay, J.1. Heard the parties.2. In this application, the petitioner has prayed for quashing of the order dated 07.08.2004 taking cognizance of the offence under Section 277 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 which has been taken against the petitioner by the Special Judge (Economic Offences), Dhanbad.3. The facts in short are that C.O. Case No. 24/04 was filed before the Special Judge, Economic Offences, Dhanbad by one Vijay Bhaskar, Income Tax Officer, Ward No. - II(1), Dhanbad allegint therein that the accused/petitioner Smt. Namita Roy is an assessee having PAN No. ACGPR 3752G and she was an LIC Agent. It is alleged that she derived income in the shape of commission from LIC. She filed her Income Tax Return for the Assessment Year 2001 - 02 duly signed by her on 27.09.2001, with the Income Tax Department, disclosing that the total income from all sources was Rs. 45,651/- and she claimed a refund of Rs. 21,672/- on the basis of TDS Certificate of Form 16A purported to have been ...
- ‹ Prev
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- Next ›
- Last »