Jharkhand Court August 2008 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Ram Vilas Singh and ors. Vs. Steel Authority of India Limited and ors.
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-22-2008
Reported in: 2008(56)BLJR2932; [2008(4)JCR669(Jhr)]
ORDERAjit Kumar Sinha, J.1. The present writ petition has been preferred for issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari to quash the order dated 08.08.2001, passed by respondent No. 3, rejecting the representations of the petitioners pursuant to the order dated 11.04.2001, passed by the then Ranchi Bench of Hon'ble Patna High Court in C.W.J.C. No. 3235 of 1999(R). Further prayer is for a direction to the respondents to consider and grant promotion to the petitioners in Non-Executive/Executive Cadre from the date(s), they became eligible, with all consequential service and monetary benefits.2. The facts, in brief, as submitted by the petitioners, are set out as under:There was a common line of promotion for all the workers, working in different sections of E & E Department (Now EMD) and could have been considered for promotion in another section. They have further raised a contention that one S.K. Verma, who was junior to them in different grades, was promoted superceding the petiti...
Chaitan Soren Vs. the State of Bihar, Now Jharkhand and ors.
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-22-2008
Reported in: 2008(57)BLJR1; [2008(4)JCR660(Jhr)]
M.Y. Eqbal, J.1. This appeal under Clause 10 of the Letters Patent is directed against the judgment passed in CWJC No. 8818/98 whereby the learned Single Judge dismissed the writ petition and refused to interfere with the punishment imposed upon the appellant in a departmental proceeding.2. The facts of the case lie in a narrow compass:The appellant was posted on deputation as night guard along with others. F.I.R. was lodged on the basis of a Fard Beyan of one Hurni Devi wife of Jhabbu Rai of village Balthar of Manoharpur Police Station alleging therein that the appellant, while he was deputed along with Arms Guards, absconded from his duty and tress-passed in the house of one Hurni Devi and caught her left hand with bad intention. She raised alarm on which the appellant was caught and he was brought by the villagers to the Police Station in drunken condition. On the basis of the said fardbeyan a criminal case was instituted being Manoharpur Police Station case No. 91 of 1989 for the o...
Suresh Prasad Bhagat Vs. the State of Jharkhand and ors.
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-22-2008
Reported in: [2008(4)JCR648(Jhr)]
ORDERAjit Kumar Sinha, J.1. The present writ petition has been filed for issuance of an appropriate writ, order or direction to quash the order dated 16.09.2002, passed by the Commissioner, Santhai Parganas, Dumka (respondent No. 2) whereby the claim of the petitioner for extending him the Graduate Trained Scale with effect from 01.04.1985 and Post-Graduate Scale of the post of Headmaster with effect from 16.03.1996, was rejected.2. The brief facts, as submitted by the petitioner, are set out as under:An advertisement was published to the effect that all eligible persons, who had earlier applied against the post of Teachers Unit for the District of Santhai Parganas and were found suitable after appearing in an interview by the Committee so constituted and had also completed the Training Course but were not able to pass the examination because of non-holding of examination were to be appointed. Accordingly, 21 Assistant Teachers, including the petitioner, who had completed the Training ...
Dr. Nilam Pandey @ Nilam Choubey Vs. State of Jharkhand Through Secret ...
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-22-2008
Reported in: [2008(4)JCR448(Jhr)]
ORDERD.G.R. Patnaik, J.1. Prayer in this writ application has been made for issuance of an appropriate writ for following relief(s).1. For quashing the order dated 5.10.2002 (Annexure-19) whereby and whereunder the Acting Vice-Chancellor-cum-Registrar, Binova Bhave University, Hazaribagh has disposed of the representation of the petitioner.2. For directing the respondents to regularise the service of the petitioner against the vacant sanctioned post of Lecturer in Botany in Shree Shree Laxmi Narayan Trust Mahila Maha Vidyalaya, Dhanbad (hereinafter referred to as SSLNT College) (Respondent No. 6).3. For directing the respondents to make payment forthwith the petitioner's salary from 1997 onwards till date the petitioner had worked as lecturer of Botany in the said SSLNT College, at par with regular lecturer.4. For directing the respondents to pay the arrears of difference of salary to the petitioner at par with other regular lecturers of the said college and also in the same terms and ...
Dr. Shakti Shankar Verma Vs. State of Jharkhand Through Cbi
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-22-2008
Reported in: [2008(4)JCR335(Jhr)]
ORDERR.R. Prasad, J.1. Heard learned Counsel appearing for the appellant and learned Counsel appearing for the CBI on the matter of bail.2. Learned Counsel appearing for the appellant submitted that the appellant has been convicted for the offences under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 read with Sections 465, 477-A and 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code and also under Section 13(1)(d) read with Section 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act and was awarded maximum sentence for six years for one of the offences on the allegation that the appellant while was posted as General Manager in cattle farm, Hotwar from 1.12.1994 to 30.4.1995 passed invoices for payment and had issued supply orders on the basis of forged allotment letters but the Investigating Officer (PW 117) has admitted in his cross-examination that no forged allotment letters had been issued during the tenure of the appellant and as such the appellant had no knowledge about any forged allotment letter and that the appellant had o...
Vivek Sarawgi (Minor) Vs. Ranchi Municipal Corporation and ors.
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-22-2008
Reported in: [2009(1)JCR149(Jhr)]
ORDERD.G.R. Patnaik, J.1. By earlier order dated 14.7.2008, a point was raised by the learned Counsel for the petitioner that the respondent Municipal Authorities have wrongly claimed that the petitioner had made encroachment on the disputed land without carrying out on spot measurement on the basis of the revisional survey map of 1935 and instead by placing wrong reliance upon the survey carried out in the year 1929, the respondent municipal authorities have been claiming that the boundary constructed by the petitioner is an encroachment. Learned Counsel had relied in this context on the judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of Shri Raja Durga Singh of Solon v. Tholu and Ors. reported in : [1963]2SCR693 , and another judgment passed by this Court in Dwarika Sonar and Ors. v. Most. Bilguli and Ors. reported in as also the case of Rajendra Khalko v. The Ranchi Municipal Corporation, Ranchi and Ors. passed in WPC No. 3075 of 2002. It further appears that on the above issue, learned C...
Gopalka Credit Corporation Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors.
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-21-2008
Reported in: 2008(57)BLJR144; [2008(4)JCR443(Jhr)]
ORDERAjit Kumar Sinha, J.1. The petitioner has preferred this writ petition for issuance of an appropriate writ, order or direction to quash the order dated 03.12.2002, contained in letter No. 3040, vide which the respondent authority has directed the petitioner to pay up-to-date arrears of tax of Vehicle No. BR-14P-5754 before getting the same registered upon transfer in favour of the petitioner-firm. Prayer has also been made for transfer of the vehicle in favour of the petitioner-firm in view of Section 51(5) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.2. The brief facts, as stated by the petitioner, are set out as under:The petitioner is a financial firm providing loan for purchase of vehicles under Hire Purchase Agreement. The case of the petitioner is that it had financed for purchase of an old bus bearing Registration No. BR-14P-5754 to one Smt. Rubina Khatoon (respondent No. 4) on 11.06.1998 and she had agreed to pay the entire amount with interest in 24 monthly installment of Rs. 11,682/-...
Lucas Dang and Bachu Prasad Verma Vs. Jharkhand State Agriculture Prod ...
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-21-2008
Reported in: 2008(57)BLJR45; [2008(4)JCR303(Jhr)]
D.G.R. Patnaik, J.1. The petitioners in these writ petitions have prayed for the issuance of a writ of certiorari for quashing the orders dated 31.5.2008 (annexure 3 & 4 to the writ petitions) whereby and whereunder the petitioners have been transferred from their present place of posting to other stations in the same capacity and the private respondents, who are presently holding the posts of Accountants, have been posted as Market Secretaries in place of the petitioners.The petitioner in WP No. 2910 of 2008 has been working as Market Secretary at Chaibasa. Inspite of his sincere and devoted work, the petitioner was served with the impugned order dated 31.5.2008 (annexure 3) on 2.6.2008 whereby he was transferred to Khunti and in his place, respondent No. 4 has been adjusted as Market Secretary at Chaibasa and respondent No. 5 has also been given the post of Market Secretary at Sahibganj, although neither of them can legally hold the post of Market Secretary, that too without the appr...
Lord Budha Educational and Social Development Sansthan Vs. the Union o ...
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-21-2008
Reported in: [2009(1)JCR99(Jhr)]
R.R. Prasad, J.1. The Heavy Engineering Corporation Limited, a Government or India undertaking, Ranchi has been declared sick Company by the BIFR in the year 1992 and therefore, revival and financial restructuring of the Company was approved in the year 1996 but the scheme failed and, therefore, BIFR in the year 2004 recommended for its winding up and accordingly, the matter was referred to this Court to proceed with as per the provision of the Companies Act. But said recommendation was challenged before this Court by the Company, vide W.P.(C) No.4513 of 2004. Both the matters were taken up together by this Court and this Court called upon stake holders of the Company to file affidavit as to whether they want to revive the company. Upon it, Union of India as well as Government of Jharkhand filed affidavit showing their desire to revive the Company. Thereupon this Court vide order dated 10.2.2005 allowed the CMD of the Company to negotiate with the Government/non-Government Organization...
Shri Ram Paswan Vs. State of Bihar and ors.
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-21-2008
Reported in: [2008(4)JCR440(Jhr)]
ORDERAjit Kumar Sinha, J.1. The present writ petition has been preferred for issuance of an appropriate writ in the nature of certiorari to quash the order dated 18th February, 1989, issued by respondent No. 3, dismissing the petitioner from service and for realisation of a sum of Rs. 10,637/- in one lump sum from the petitioner.2. The facts, in brief, as stated by the petitioner, are set out as under:The petitioner while posted as Chief Instructor, I.T.I,, Gua, was served with a memo dated 29th July, 1987 vide which he was put under suspension and, thereafter, a charge sheet was issued vide memo No. 2489 dated 3rd September, 1987 directing him to submit his show cause to the enquiry officer. The charges against the petitioner were of committing fraud and forgery, causing losses to the respondents and also for preparing false and forged records. It was also pointed out that the petitioner himself vide letters/applications dated 14th June, 1984 and 14th July, 1987 accepted that he commi...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »