Jharkhand Court July 2008 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Krishna Mohan Prasad Vs. State of Jharkhand Through Cbi
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-16-2008
Reported in: [2008(3)JCR545(Jhr)]
ORDERD.G.R. Patnaik, J.1. I.A. No. 1010 of 2008 has been filed by the appellant with a prayer for stay of the order of conviction dated 20.12.2007, passed by the learned Special Judge, CBI, Ranchi.2. The petitioner/appellant was convicted for the offence under Sections 7 and 13(2) read with Section 13(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act and sentenced to imprisonment.3. The trial Court, while convicting the appellant had granted him provisional ball, which after admission of the present appeal for hearing, was confirmed till the disposal of this appeal by an order of this Court. The petitioner/appellant has now come up with a prayer for staying the order of his conviction on the ground that he has been served with a show cause notice by his superior in office, namely, the Deputy General Manager (P & IR). Central Coal Fields Ltd., Ranchi, on the basis of the judgment of conviction, as to why he should not be dismissed from service.4. Mr. Anil Kumar Sinha, learned senior counsel for...
Janak Kumar Mishra Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors.
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-16-2008
Reported in: [2008(3)JCR549(Jhr)]
ORDER1. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner in public interest stating that there is no public transport system operating in the city of Ranchi which is a great inconvenience to the citizens of Ranchi. It has therefore, been prayed that a public transport system should be evolved in the city of Ranchi to facilitate public commutation.2. We find substance in this plea and hence, we have heard learned Advocate General in this matter, as notices were issued to the State as also to the Municipal Corporation which has the statutory duty to operate the public transport system.3. In response to the show cause notice, it was submitted by the Advocate General that the operation of the public transport system is a duty of the State as also the statutory duty of the Municipal Corporation which has been accepted by the counsel for the Municipal Corporation who has relied upon provisions of Section 63(OO) of the Municipal Act for this purpose.4. We are happy to know that in addition...
Harihar Thakur Vs. State of Bihar (Now Jharkhand)
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-16-2008
Reported in: 2008CriLJ4560; [2008(3)JCR543(Jhr)]
ORDERD.K. Sinha, J.1. This criminal appeal is directed against the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 28.6.2000, passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Palamau at Daltonganj in S.T. No. 608 of 1998, whereby and whereunder, the sole appellant Harihar Thakur was convicted under Section 376 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for seven years and fine of Rs. 2,000/- with default stipulation.2. Prosecution story, as it sands narrated in the fardbeyan of the informant PW 2 Ram Naresh Giri recorded on 24.7.1998, was that he had married his daughter Manju Devi, aged about 25 years, some eight years ago with one Harihar Giri of Banaras but as she was suffering from epilepsy, she was returned by her husband from her matrimonial home. Her husband deserted her by severing relationship on account of her regular epileptic fits and that she was mentally challenged. It was further narrated that in his house besides Manju Devi, his wife and younger dau...
Sri Prakash JaIn Vs. State of Jharkhand and anr.
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-16-2008
Reported in: [2008(4)JCR233(Jhr)]
ORDERR.R. Prasad, J.1. This application has been filed Under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for quashing the entire criminal proceeding of Complaint Case No. 566 of 2008 including the order dated 19.3.2008 whereby and whereunder cognizance of the offences Under Sections 420/385 of the Indian. Penal Code has been taken against the petitioner.2. The facts giving rise this application are that the complainant, Director of a company named as M/s. Satyabhama Developers Pvt. Ltd. lodged a case stating therein that the company is engaged in developing land by constructing multi storied building. In course of time, one Sri Prakash Jain (petitioner) entered into an agreement along with other land owners whereby multi storied building over a piece of land was to be constructed and the petitioner was to be given a flat measuring 1500 sq. ft. along with parking space which on being constructed was given to him and thereafter he along with other land owners executed a deed of power o...
Vikash Agarwal Vs. State of Jharkhand and anr.
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-16-2008
Reported in: [2008(4)JCR39(Jhr)]
ORDERR.R. Prasad, J.1. This application has been filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for quashing the entire criminal Proceeding of Complaint Case No. 206 of 2007 including the order dated 25.7.2007 whereby and whereunder cognizance of the offences under Sections 406/409/417 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code has been taken against the petitioner.2. The facts giving rise this application are that the complainant-opposite party No. 2 lodged a case stating therein that he being a land owner of a piece of land, measuring 20 decimal, bearing plot No. 679 (sub plot No. 769/E), under khata No. 85, situated at village Kathargonda, Kanke Road along with five other land owners entered into an agreement, vide deed of agreement dated 23.6.1995 with a Developer M/s. Satyabhama Developers to which petitioner is a Director, whereby it was agreed upon to develop the land by constructing apartments to be sold to different purchasers and to give proportionate share in the built up p...
Brahamdeo Prasad Gupta and ors. Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-16-2008
Reported in: [2008(4)JCR697(Jhr)]
D.G.R. Patnaik, J.1. The appellants have challenged the judgment of conviction and order of sentence, passed by the Court of the learned 6th Additional Sessions Judge, F.T.C., Palamau in Sessions Trial No. 244 of 2003. whereby they were convicted for the offence under Section 306 of the IPC and sentenced to undergo imprisonment for seven years and further convicted for the offences under Sections 498-A, 120-B and 201 of the IPC and sentenced to undergo imprisonment for two years.2. The case against the appellants was registered on 1.3.2001 at Chhatterpur Police Station on the basis of the First Information Report lodged by the informant Arun Chandra Gupta (PW 7). The informant's specific case is that his sister, namely Santosh Devi was married to the appellant No. 2, Sunil Kumar Gupta in the year 1992. The deceased used to live at her matrimonial house in the company of her husband and her parents-in-law, namely, the appellant No. 1 and the appellant No. 3 respectively. In the morning ...
YasIn Ansari Vs. Management of Bokaro Steel Plant Through Its M.D.
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-15-2008
Reported in: [2008(3)JCR531(Jhr)]
ORDER1. This appeal has been filed against the order dated 1.5.2007 passed by the learned single Judge in WP(L) No. 6351/2006 by which the application bearing LA. No. 599/2007 was rejected which was the application filed by the appellant-workman claiming wages under Section 17-B of the Industrial Disputes Act on the basis of the salary last drawn by him as he had succeeded before the Labour Court which had passed award in his favour for his reinstatement with full back wages. Thereafter the respondent-management had filed a writ petition before the learned single Judge which has been admitted and is pending consideration. During pendency of the writ petition, the appellant-workman filed an application under Section 17-B of the Industrial Disputes Act claiming wages on the basis of the salary last drawn by him. The learned single Judge was pleased to reject the application claiming wages on 1.5.2007 on the ground that the appellant had reached the age of superannuation in 2006 itself an...
Yogendra Dhar Dubey Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors.
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-15-2008
Reported in: [2008(3)JCR542(Jhr)]
ORDERAmareshwar Sahay, J.1. Heard the parties and with their consent this writ application is being disposed of at this stage itself.2. The claim of the petitioner is for appointment to the post of police constable.3. The grievance of the petitioner in this writ application is that he has wrongly been not appointed as constable because he was entitled to get 7 marks for his educational qualification because he is Intermediate Pass, whereas he has wrongly been awarded only 6 marks on consideration that he was a Matriculate. It is stated that prior to the publication of the final result, the petitioner had already submitted a certificate to show that he is Intermediate Pass. It is submitted that if this fact would have been considered by the authority concerned, then the petitioner would have secured 20 marks. It is also stated that the candidates securing 20 marks have been appointed and, therefore, the petitioner also entitled to be appointed on the post of police constable. It is stat...
Bharat Coking Coal Limited and ors. Vs. Baij Nath Mahato
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-15-2008
Reported in: [2008(4)JCR130(Jhr)]
1. This appeal has been preferred by the appellant-Management of M/s. Bharat Coking Coal Limited against the order dated 08.2.2008 passed by learned Single Judge in W.P.(S) No. 1477 of 2007 by which the writ petition had been allowed directing reinstatement of the respondent-workman along with backwages for the period during which he was compelled to remain out of job.2. To highlight the controversy, it would be relevant to record that the respondent-workman was duly discharging his duties with the appellant-Management since 1977 when he was taken in service and after his appointment his date of birth admittedly was recorded 29 years ago, when he was due to retire in 2017. However, the appellant-Management raised dispute regarding date of birth of the respondent-workman and referred him before the Board for medical examination. The respondent-workman appeared before the Medical Board where his age was assessed more than what was recorded in Form-B register which was filled at the time ...
Namo Narayan Singh Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors.
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-15-2008
Reported in: [2008(3)JCR536(Jhr)]
ORDERAmareshwar Sahay, J.1. Heard the parties.2. The prayer of the petitioner in this writ application is to quash the order dated 26.5.2007, contained in Annexure-4, issued under the signature of respondent No. 4, the Superintendent of Police, Hazaribagh, whereby the petitioner was informed that the Selection Board has cancelled the candidature of the petitioner for the appointment of Police Constable pursuant to the advertisement No. 1/2004. Further prayer is that after quashing of Annexure-4, the petitioner be reinstated on the post of constable.3. According to the petitioner, pursuant to the advertisement No. 1/2004, he applied for appointment to the post of Police Constable and he was allotted Roll No. 4011 A. The petitioner was declared successful in all the tests. His height was found to be 181.5 cm. and he also possessed the required educational qualification of matric pass. The petitioner, thereafter, received a call letter contained in Annexure-3 dated 3.4.2007, asking the pe...
- ‹ Prev
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- Next ›
- Last »