Jharkhand Court October 2007 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Dr. N.K. Shrivastava, Vs. Damodar Valley Corporation Through Its Chair ...
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Oct-10-2007
Reported in: [2008(1)JCR337(Jhr)]
R.K. Merathia, J.1. Heard the parties.2. Petitioners have challenged the office order dated 8.9.2005 (Annexure-8), by which respondent Nos. 5 to 8 were appointed to officiate as Assistant Headmaster on account of their promotion; on the ground that the rightful claim of the petitioners for such promotion has been ignored, and for consequential reliefs.3. The relevant facts, in short, are as follows. On 5.3.2004, a notice was published inviting applications for filling up the post of Assistant Headmaster for various High School/Higher Secondary School of Damodar Valley Corporation-respondents ( DVC for short) from the DVC Teachers, who fulfill the condition as per para (ix) of item 6 of Office Memorandum No. PL-119/92-97 dated 30th October, 1992, quoted therein as follows:ix) The post of Asstt. Headmaster of Senior Section would be filled up by selection through internal advertisement in which Post Graduate Teachers and those Trained Graduate Teachers (with P.G. Degree) whose erstwhile ...
Om Prakash Agarwala Vs. the State of Jharkhand and ors.
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Oct-10-2007
Reported in: 2008CriLJ2195
D.G.R. Patnaik, J. 1. The petitioner has filed the instant application praying for quashing the entire criminal proceedings including the order of cognizance dated 12.02.2002: passed by the learned CJM, Ranchi in C/III Case No. 40 of 2002 for an offence under Section 48 or the (sic)agricultural Produce Markets Act which is now pending in the court of Sri Santosh Kumar, Judicial Magistrate. Ranchi.2. the case against the petitioner was registered of the basis of a complaint dated 11.2.200 filed in the court of the CJM, Ranchi, by the Agriculture Produce Markets Committee through its Secretary alleging inter alia that the accused persons are traders as defined under Section 2(w) of the Bihar Agriculture produce Markets Act (hereinafter referred to as the Act) engaged in business of ply board/ply patti and other similar commodities which are agriculture produce as defined under Section 2(1 (a) of the Act vide notification of the State of Bihar vide SO No. 2531 dated 31.8.2000 published on...
Spartan Carriers Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Central Coalfields Ltd. and ors.
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Oct-08-2007
Reported in: 2008(56)BLJR53; [2008(1)JCR338(Jhr)]
Narendra Nath Tiwari, J.1. In this writ petition, the petitioner had initially prayed for a direction on he espondents to consider his bid and call the petitioner for negotiation in terms of Notice Inviting Tender (for short NIT) dated 21st April, 2007 and for quashing the impugned letter, whereby one M/s. Rajiv Transport Coal Agency, Kujju, Hazaribagh was called for negotiation. During the pendency of this writ petition, decision has been taken by the respondents to award contract in favour of M/s. Rajiv Transport Coal Agency. In view of the charged circumstance, the petitioner by way of amendment has prayed for quashing the said decision.2. The said notice, inviting tender, was issued by the Central Coalfields Ltd. for allotment of work for transfer of coal by Tractor Pay Loader into Tractor Tipping Trucks from Pundi OC Surface Top and transportation to Rajrappa Washery Bunker/Stock after weighment at Rajrappa Washery Weighbridge. The petitioner had applied for allotment of the said ...
Deula Santhal Vs. State of Bihar and ors.
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Oct-08-2007
Reported in: [2008(1)JCR152(Jhr)]
M.Y. Eqbal, J.1. This appeal under Clause 10 of the Letters Patent is directed against the judgment dated 21.7.2006 passed in CWJC No. 2470 of 1999 (R), whereby the learned single Judge dismissed the writ petition filed by the appellant and affirmed the order passed by the Commissioner, South Chotanagpur Division, Ranchi.2. The facts of the case lie in a narrow compass:The petitioner being a member of Schedule Tribe filed an application under Section 71-A of the Chotanagpur Tenancy Act (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') against respondent No. 5- Shiv Charan Das claiming restoration of 36 decimals of land of village Satpura in the district of Singhbhum, The case of the petitioner-appellant was that the land in question comprised within R.S. Plot No. 22 under Khata No. 14 originally recorded in the Record of Rights prepared in the year 1934 in the name of the pre-decessor-in-interest of the appellant. The land in question was surrendered in favour of ex-landlord by a registered deed ...
Janak Kumar Mishra Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors.
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Oct-08-2007
Reported in: [2008(1)JCR151(Jhr)]
ORDER1. Now the report has been filed by the learned Advocate General today on 8th October, 2007. The report indicated that meeting was convened on 24th September, 2007, attended by various officers as well as the learned Advocate, appearing for the petitioner. From the repost it is clear that the Assistant Commissioner, Transport Department, Jharkhand, Ranchi, has already issued, notice to the public, inviting applications for road permits in respect of four routes in accordance with the order dated 14.8.2007, passed by this Court. The Superintendent of Police (Traffic), Ranchi, has informed the learned Advocate General on 4.10.2007 that 10 City Buses have already started plying in the town of Ranchi and those buses are being regularly plied, details of which are as under: _____________________________________________________________________ Sl. Route Permit Vehicle Present No. No. No. position _____________________________________________________________________ 1. Kanke Mental Hospi...
Rakesh Kiran, Vs. Ranchi University, Through Its Vice Chancellor and o ...
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Oct-06-2007
Reported in: [2008(1)JCR342(Jhr)]
ORDERAmareshwar Sahay, J.1. Heard Mr. Rajendra Krishna, learned Counsel appearing for the petitioners and Mr. Anoop Kumar Mehta, learned Counsel appearing for the Ranchi University.2. In this writ application, the petitioners have prayed for the following reliefs:(i) to quash Annexures-1, 1/A and 1/B of the writ petition dated 29.09 2007 by which the candidature of the three petitioners for contesting Students' Union Election of the Ranchi University had been rejected by the Returning Officer of the Students' Union Election, Chotanagpur Law College, Ranchi on the ground that they have crossed the maximum age limits for contesting the said Election;(ii) to quash the letter dated 30th September, 2007 (Annexure-3) by which the application of the petitioners for reviewing the said decision rejecting their candidature has been rejected by the Dean, Students' Welfare, Ranchi University (Respondent No. 3)(iii) to declare the amendments made by the Ranchi University in the statutes of the Univ...
Tribhuwan Prasad Singh Vs. State of Jharkhand Through C.B.i.
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Oct-05-2007
Reported in: 2008CriLJ1170
D.K. Sinha, J.1. The Present Interlocutory Application has been preferred by the appellant Tribhuwan Prasad Singh for stay/ suspension of operation of conviction order dated 12.3.2007 passed by Shri V.S. Singh, Special Judge, C.B.I.-cum-13th Addl. Sessions Judge, Dhanbad in R.C Case No. 16A/1986D whereby and whereunder the appellant was held guilty of the charges under Sections 409/477A I.P.C. as also under Section 5(2) r/w Section 5(i) (c) of the Prevention of Corruption Act and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for two years each under Section 409 and 477A IPC. and further sentenced to undergo 1 year rigorous imprisonment and fine of Rs. 50Q/- under Sections 5(2) r/w 5(i)(c) of Prevention of Corruption Act. 198.9 with default stipulation to undergo simple imprisonment for three months. The provisional bail granted to the petitioner by the trial court after his conviction and sentence was confirmed on 9.04.2007 during the pendency of this appeal.2. The learned Counsel submitt...
Hira Nath Singh and ors. Vs. Bihar School Examination Board and anr.
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Oct-04-2007
Reported in: 2008(56)BLJR450; [2008(1)JCR186(Jhr)]
M.Y. Eqbal, J.1. Since these two appeals have arisen out of the common judgment and common questions of law are involved, they have been heard together and are disposed of by this order.2. Two writ petitions being CWJC No. 2213 of 2000 and CWJC No. 1358 of 1999(R) were filed by the petitioners with a common prayer for publication of result of Primary Teachers' Training Examination. The petitioners of CWJC No. 1358 of 1999(R) were regular students of S.P.G. Mission Primary Teachers' Training College (Male), Ranchi. Their case was that they completed their study for the sessions 1991-93 and having been found eligible, were allowed to appear in the Primary Teachers' Training Examination held in August, 1994 by the Bihar School Examination Board, Patna (hereinafter referred to as 'the Board').The petitioners of CWJC No. 2213 of 2000 were also the regular students of S.P.G. Mission Primary Teachers' Training College (Male), Ranchi who completed their studies for the sessions 1991-93 and 199...
Raj Refractories (P) Ltd. Vs. the State of Jharkhand and ors.
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Oct-04-2007
Reported in: [2008(1)JCR143(Jhr)]
M.Y. Eqbal, J. 1. This appeal under Clause 10 of the Letters Patent is directed against the judgment dated 31.7.2007 passed in W.P.(C) No. 565 of 2007 whereby the learned Single Judge dismissed the writ petition filed by the petitioner-appellant on various grounds including suppression of material fact.2. In the writ petition, the petitioner sought a direction upon the Respondents to pass appropriate order on the application filed by it on 6th September, 2003 under Rule 9(1) of the Mineral Concessions Rules/1960 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Rules') for grant of prospecting licence for the purpose of mining iron ore over an area of 690 hectares in village Kodalibad/Saranda Reserve Forest in the district of Singhbhum. Further prayer was made for an order restraining the respondent-State Government as well as the Central Government from processing the application of any other parties for grant of mining lease over the said area until petitioner's application for grant of prospecting l...
Tulsi Mahto Vs. State of Jharkhand and Gunjari Devi
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Oct-04-2007
Reported in: [2008(1)JCR145(Jhr)]
D.K. Sinha, J.1. Heard the parties.2. Both the criminal revisions have arisen out of common order passed in M.P. Case No. 15 of 2002, by learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Bokaro, on 8.2.2006 which is impugned, whereby and whereunder, learned Principal Judge by allowing a proceeding under Section 125 of Code of Criminal Procedure directed the husband Tulsi Mahto to pay a sum of Rs. 1,000/- per month to Gunjari Devi from the date of the impugned order as her maintenance allowance, with default stipulation.3. Petitioner Gunjari Devi of Cr. Revision No. 405 of 2006 was aggrieved of the order impugned on the ground that amount awarded to her by learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Bokaro was inadequate as against the demand of Rs. 3,000/- per month and hence she preferred criminal revision.4. On the other hand, petitioner Tulsi Mahto of Cr. Revision No. 173 of 2006 was aggrieved of the order impugned on the ground that Gunjari Devi was an imposter and was never his married wife.5. Mr...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 3
- Next ›
- Last »