Jharkhand Court September 2006 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
SaharuddIn Mian Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-01-2006
Reported in: [2006(4)JCR633(Jhr)]
ORDERD.P. Singh, J.1. The sole appellant Saharuddin Mian has preferred this appeal against the judgment and order dated 7.8.2002 and 8.8.2002 passed by Shri Kumar Kamal, Additional Sessions Judge, F.T.C.-1. Bermo at Tenughat in Sessions Trial No. 326 of 1987 whereby and whereunder the appellant has been convicted under Section 326 of the Indian Penal Code and has been sentenced to undergo R.I. for five years.2. Brief facts leading to this appeal are that in the morning of 18.11.1986 the informant Sultan Ansari returned to his house in village Barki Punu P.S. Mahuwatand Distt. Giridih after taking bath in village pond to find the appellant along with Asgar Mian standing in front of his house, abusing his father and others. Further stated when PW-4 Alizan Mian eldest uncle of the informant came out of his house, both the accused named above asked others in all fifteen persons to assault him armed variously with Lathi. Bhala, Farsa and swords started assaulting the said Alizan Mian. The i...
Durga Sao and anr. Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-01-2006
Reported in: [2006(4)JCR629(Jhr)]
Dhananjay Prasad Singh, J.1. Heard the parties.2. The appeal arises against the judgment of conviction dated 16th July. 2002 and order of sentence dated 17th July, 2002 passed by the learned 12th Additional Sessions Judge, Dhanbad in Sessions Trial No. 200 of 1995. whereby the learned trial Court convicted the appellants, abovenamed. for the offence under Section 326, IPC and sentenced Appellant No. 1 to undergo simple imprisonment for one year and appellant No. 2 to undergo simple imprisonment for three months for the offence under Section 326, IPC, each.3. Brief facts leading to this appeal are that Laljee Sao. since deceased, used to reside with the appellants, as Durga Sao was his youngest son. in his house situated in Nunudih. P.S. Jorapokhar. Sudamdih. Dhanbad. As alleged, on 1st August, 1994, at about 10.00 a.m. both the appellants, wife and husband, called him and asked him to vacate the house occupied by him otherwise he would be killed. As stated, when the Informant. Laljee S...
Jiyan Manjhi Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-01-2006
Reported in: [2006(4)JCR631(Jhr)]
Dhananjay Prasad Singh, J.1. Heard the parties.2. This appeal arises against the judgment of conviction dated 25th June, 2002 and order of sentence dated 26th June, 2002 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Jamtara in Sessions Case No. 146 of 2001 (Dumka)/340 of 2001 whereby the learned trial Court convicted the appellant, abovenamed, for the offence under Sections 366 and 376, IPC and sentenced him to undergo rigorous imprisonment for seven years and to pay fine of Rs. 2,000/- for the offence under Sections 366 and 376, IPC, each. In default of payment of fine, the learned trial Court further sentenced the appellant to undergo rigorous imprisonment for six months for the offence under Sections 366 and 376, IPC, each, and all sentences shall run concurrently.3. Brief facts leading to this appeal are that the informant/complainant, Mamta Ghosh, used to reside with her father in village Dumaria, P.S. Bindapathar and the appellant was also residing in the vicinity by same village. Accord...
Krishna Bihari Singh Vs. State of Jharkhand (Through Cbi)
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-01-2006
Reported in: [2007(1)JCR540(Jhr)]
Amareshwar Sahay, J.1. This appeal is directed against the judgment dated 27.2.2004 passed by the Special Judge, CBI-cum-lst Additional Sessions Judge, Dhanbad in RC Case No. 18(A)/1990 (R) whereby and whereunder the learned Special Judge convicted the appellant for the offence punishable under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) read with Section 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act and sentenced him to undergo RI for a period of six months and to pay fine of Rs. 500/- in default to undergo SI for a further period of three months for the offence under Section 7 of the Prevention of Corruption Act and RI for a period of one year and to pay a fine of Rs. 500/- in default to undergo SI for a further period of three months for the offence under Section 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act. However, both the sentences were directed to run concurrently.2. The prosecution case in short is that the information (PW 1) Radhika Raman, supervisor of M/s Pradeep Enterprises Construction, B.S. City, ...
Arup Kumar Modi Vs. State of Bihar (Now Jharkhand)
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-01-2006
Reported in: [2007(1)JCR384(Jhr)]
D.G.R. Patnaik, J.1. This appeal is directed against the judgment and order of conviction and sentence passed by the trial Court in S.T. No. 274 of 1990 by which the appellant has been convicted under Section 302, IPC and sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life, and also convicted under Section 307, IPC and sentenced to undergo imprisonment for five years. In addition, he was also convicted under Section 326, IPC and sentenced to undergo imprisonment for three years and also convicted under Sections 324 and 352 and sentenced to undergo imprisonment of one year for each offence. The case relates to the murder of one Renu Bala Dey (or Renuka Bala Dey) and also to the injuries caused to other members of the family of the deceased, including Subhashish Dey (PW 2), Puranjay Dey (PW 1), Subhra Kumari Dey (sister) (PW 13), and Asha Bala Modi. The case was registered on the basis of the information lodged by the informant Subhashish Dey (PW 2).2. Brief facts of the case is that on the eveni...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- Next ›