Jharkhand Court July 2006 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Ankit Enterprises and Adarsh Paper Board Co. (Pvt.) Ltd. Vs. Bihar Sta ...
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-03-2006
Reported in: [2006(4)JCR203(Jhr)]
M.Y. Eqbal, J.1. Heard Mr. Kalyan Roy, learned Counsel for the petitioner and Mr. A.K. Das, learned Counsel for the Bihar State Credit and Investment Corporation Ltd. I have also heard Mr. Delip Jerath, learned Counsel for the private respondent.2. In these writ petitions, since common question of law and facts are involved, they have been heard and disposed of by this common order3. In WPC No. 866 of 2006 the petitioner M/s Ankit Enterprises has challenged the order 31.10.2005 passed by respondent No. 2 Managing Director, Bihar State Credit and Investment Corporation Ltd. (in short BICICO), Patna whereby auction sale of assets of M/s Adarsh Paper Board Industries Pvt. Ltd. Jamshedpur in favour of the petitioner has been cancelled and the petitioner was directed to handover possession of the assets of the said company.4. In WPC No. 1129 of 2005 the petitioner M/s Adarsh Paper Board Company (P) Ltd has challenged the order of auction made in favour of M/s Ankit Enterprises5. The facts o...
Charka Turi Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-03-2006
Reported in: [2007(1)JCR117(Jhr)]
D.P. Singh, J.1. The sole appellant Charka Turi stands convicted for the offence under Sections 366 and 376 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced to serve rigorous imprisonment for seven years and eight years respectively along with fines, by the Additional Sessions Judge-cum-Fast Track Court-VIII, Giridih in Sessions Trial No. 195 of 2001.2. The prosecution case, in brief, is that in the morning of 4th August, 2000, victim Usha Kumari left her house to go to her school. She failed to return to her house. Her family members tried to search her out, after which her father Jagdish Das reported the matter to Muffasil Police Station, Giridih on 6.8.2000 suspected that the appellant along with two others may have kidnapped the girl because the appellant has threatened him to ruin only one month earlier.3. The police registered Giridih (Muffasil) Police Station Case No. 206 of 2000 and started investigation of the case and finally girl was recovered from the house of the appellant. The appe...
Arun Kumar Mahatha Vs. the State of Bihar (Now Jharkhand)
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-03-2006
Reported in: 2007CriLJ447
R.R. Prasad, J.1. The sole appellant, Arun Kumar Mahatha was put on trial for the charges that he by entering into the house of the informant, Madhuri Kumari (P.W. 4) committed rape on her. Learned Sessions Judge having found the appellant guilty convicted him under Sections 376 and 448 of the Indian Penal Code and consequently sentenced him to undergo R.I. for 7 years and to pay a fine of Rs. 100/- under Section 376 of the Indian Penal Code and in default to undergo R.I. for further period of 15 days. No separate sentence was imposed under Section 448 of the Indian Penal Code.2. The case of the prosecution is that on 24-1-1996 one Madhuri Kumari, daughter of Arun Bouri (P.W. 5) while she was alone in her house the appellant entered into her house at 12 noon and asked her to have sex with him, to which she denied and upon it the appellant put her down on the ground and tore her underpant and forcibly com mitted rape on her by gagging her mouth with gamachha and in that course when she ...
- ‹ Prev
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- Next ›