Jharkhand Court May 2006 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Smt. Meena Devi and ors. Vs. Jharkhand State Electricity Board and ors ...
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: May-04-2006
Reported in: [2006(3)JCR57(Jhr)]
Permod Kohli, J.1. Petitioner No. 1 is the widow of late Ira Deo Prasad Singh, who was serving as an Electrical Executive Engineer, Electric Supply Division, Khunti, Ranchi. The husband of the petitioner No. 1 died in harness on 24th October, 1992. After his death family pension was sanctioned in favour of the petitioner by the Bihar State Electricity Board vide P.P.O. No. 104 dated 18th February, 1993. Petitioner No. 1 has been paid pension till 20th May, 2005, whereafter her pension was stopped. She also claims arrears due to 50 per cent D.A. merger besides family pension from June, 2005 onwards. Petitioner Nos. 2 to 4 were also serving in various capacities to the Bihar State Electricity Board and retired from service. Petitioner No. 2 retired as Controller on 31st May, 1998 and his pension was sanctioned vide P.P.O. No. 608, dated 29th May, 1998 and his P.P.O. was subsequently transferred to Electrical Executive Engineer, Electric Supply Division, Aurangabad. It is alleged that he ...
Shiv Shankar Jha Vs. Jharkhand Public Service Commission and ors.
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: May-04-2006
Reported in: [2006(3)JCR139(Jhr)]
ORDERM.Y. Eqbal, J.1. In this writ application the petitioner has prayed for issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari for quashing the order dated 4.8.2005 issued by respondent No. 1 Jharkhand Public Service commission whereby petitioner has been declared unfit for being promoted as Deputy Superintendent of Police on the ground mentioned therein.2. Petitioner's case is that he was appointed as Sub-Inspector of Police in the State of Bihar in the year 1972 and was confirmed on the said post in 1975. In 1985 he was promoted to the post of Police Inspector. In 1995, a departmental proceeding No. 24/95 was initiated against the petitioner and he was punished by the Bihar Government vide order dated 26.2.2002. .Another departmental proceeding No. 38 of 2000 was also initiated against the petitioner by the then State of Bihar for his alleged misconduct and the petitioner was punished by imposing a major punishment in terms of order dated 24.4.2002. In departmental proceeding No. 24/95....
Punam Arya Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: May-04-2006
Reported in: 2006CriLJ3922; [2006(3)JCR276(Jhr)]
ORDERNarendra Nath Tiwari, J.1. In this case the learned Court below has rejected the application for ball of the petitioner, who has earlier surrendered before the trial Court and furnished bail bond in compliance of the order of anticipatory bail, observing that since the petitioner is not in custody, application for regular bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure is not maintainable. A question arises in this case is as to whether a person, who has surrendered before the Court and furnished bail bond in compliance of the order of the anticipatory bail and is still under the period of protection of anticipatory bail, can be said to be 'in custody' within the meaning of Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure reads thus:439. Special powers of High Court or Court of Session regarding bail.-(1) A High Court or Court of Session may direct-(a) that any person accused of an offence and in custody be released on bail, and...
Steel Authority of India Ltd. Vs. the Workmen of the Management of Ste ...
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: May-04-2006
Reported in: [2006(3)JCR432(Jhr)]; (2007)ILLJ185Jhar
S.J. Mukhopadhaya, J.1. This appeal has been preferred by the appellant, Steel Authority of India Limited, Bokaro Steel Plant, Bokaro Steel City, Bokaro (hereinafter referred as 'the Company') against the judgment dated 30th September, 2003 passed by learned Single Judge in CWJC No. 2186 of 1996(R), whereby and whereunder, the learned Single Judge dismissed the writ petition, as was preferred by the appellant-Company against the Award dated 18th December, 1995 passed by the learned Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Bokaro Steel City, Bokaro in Reference Case No. 11 of 1990.2. As the case can be disposed of on a short point, it is not necessary to discuss all the facts, except the relevant one, as detailed hereunder :The workman, Chandra Sekhar Jha was engaged as Khalasi for a period of three months' on 6th September, 1984 in Blast Furnace of Bokaro Steel Plant, Bokaro Steel City, Bokaro. It was extended from time to time and his name was struck off from the role of the Company on 1st Ja...
Rajendra Mistri Vs. Bharat Coking Coal Ltd. and ors.
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: May-04-2006
Reported in: [2006(110)FLR1181]; [2006(3)JCR305(Jhr)]
ORDERS.J. Mukhopadhaya, J.1. This writ petition was preferred by the petitioner for a direction on the respondents not to superannuate him from service except on the basis of his date of birth as recorded in his original service record i.e. 16th July, 1949.2. The grievance of the petitioner is that the respondents have arbitrarily pushed back his date of birth from 16th July, 1949 to 1st July, 1946 without any basis and without informing him. In support of his claim that his date of birth has been recorded in service records as 16th July, 1949 the petitioner has enclosed a filled up format issued by M/s. Bharat Coking Coal Limited (hereinafter to be referred B.C.C.L.) on 7th July, 1987 (vide Annexsure-1 to the writ petition) showing therein the relevant dates and other informations as recorded in his service excerpt: Photostat copy of the identity card (Annexure-2) and the photo copy of the relevant page of Form-B Register (Annexure-3) purported to be the copy of the Form-B Register.3....
Sujeet Kumar Sah Vs. the State of Jharkhand and ors.
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: May-04-2006
Reported in: [2007(1)JCR337(Jhr)]
S.J. Mukhopadhaya, J.1. This appeal has been preferred by the appellant against the Order dated 13th September, 2005 passed by learned Single Judge in W.P.(S) No. 4192 of 2005, whereby and where under, the learned Single Judge while dismissed the writ petition, upheld the order dated 31st May, 2005 passed by the superintendent of Police, Pakur in Pakur district D.P. No. 08/05, whereby the appellant was dismissed from service.2. As the case can be disposed of on a short point, it is not necessary to discuss all the facts, except the relevant one, as detailed hereunder:In pursuance of Advertisement No. 1/04, the appellant applied for appointment to the post of Constable. As per the said advertisement, a person, who has completed 19 years and above of age as on 1st January, 2004, was eligible to apply. The date of birth of the appellant, according to certificate, is 1st December, 1985. The advertisement was published sometime in the middle of 2004, so he was approaching 19 years of age. H...
Manoj Kumar Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: May-04-2006
Reported in: [2006(4)JCR460(Jhr)]
ORDERD.K. Sinha, J.1. The petitioner Manoj Kumar, proprietor of Nitin Marble has preferred this petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for quashing the impugned order dated 3.9.2005 passed by Chief Judicial Magistrate, Hazaribagh in Chauparan PS Case No. 229 of 2000, corresponding to GR. Case No. 2823 of 2000. whereby and whereunder cognizance of the offence has been taken under Section 406 of the Indian Penal Code against the petitioner herein including quashing of the entire criminal proceeding in the said case.2. The brief facts of the case are recapitulated hereunder.3. The informant-Circle Officer of Chauparan Circle presented a written report before the Officer-in-charge of Chaparah Police Station on 12.12.2000 stating inter alia, that as against the construction of 180 units of Indira Awas work order was given to the petitioner for supply of 180 doors with angle made of iron and 180 windows, to which the petitioner entered into an agreement on 25.8.1998 for...
Shyamal Kumar Ghosal Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors.
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: May-03-2006
Reported in: [2006(3)JCR484(Jhr)]
1. This appeal has been preferred by the appellant against the order dated 22nd September, 2004, passed by the learned Single Judge in W.P.(S) No. 4917 of 2004, whereby and whereunder, prayer of the appellant for a direction on the respondents to take steps for appointment in pursuance of the earlier order, passed by this Court in C.WJ.C.No. 7963 of 1998, has been rejected.2. It appears that at the instance of the Deputy Commissioner, Godda, the Employment Exchange, Godda, issued Advertisement No. 05-19/94, published in the newspaper on 1st November, 1994 for appointment against Class III posts.3. A number of daily wage employees were working as Typist and Stenographer-cum-Assistant in the office of the District Land Acquisition Officer, Godda, having been retrenched from the service, preferred a writ petition being C.W.J.C.No. 6988 of 1992, which was disposed of on 6th September, 1993. Thereafter, Advertisement No. 05-19/94 was issued on 1st November, 1994 in pursuance of which number...
Nand Kishore Sahu Vs. the State of Bihar
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: May-03-2006
Reported in: 2006CriLJ4201; II(2006)DMC595
Amareshwar Sahay, J.1. This appeal has been preferred by the appellant against the impugned Judgment and Order of conviction and sentence dated 01.04.1998 passed by 4th passed by the Vth Additional Judicial Commissioner, Ranchi in S.T. No. 288/92 whereby and whereunder, the appellant was convicted for the offence under Section 498-A and 307 of the Indian Penal Code and was sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of three years for the offence under Section 498-A of the Indian Penal Code and R.I. for a period of seven years for the offence under Section 307 of the Indian Penal Code. 2. The prosecution case in short is that the sister of the informant Mala Devi was married to the appellant Nand Kishore Sahu in the year 1976. After two years of marriage, the appellant started torturing and assaulting his wife. Subsequently, he left his wife in his in-laws place where she lived for about three years in between 1978 to 1980. Thereafter, a Panchayati was convened and in the s...
Asiatic Oxygen Limited, Through Its Company Secretary, Shri Shambu Sin ...
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: May-03-2006
Reported in: [2006(3)JCR130(Jhr)]
Narendra Nath Tiwari, J.1. In this writ application the petitioners have prayed for setting aside the order dated 19.12.05 passed by the Sub-Judge-1, Jamshedpur in Title Suit No. 63/2000 whereby learned Court below has rejected the petitioners' application filed under Order 6 Rule 17 read with Section 151 of the C.P.C seeking a number of amendments in the plaint. 2. The brief fact giving rise to this case is that the petitioner No. 1 is a Public Limited Company, the petitioner Nos. 2 & 3 are the Private Limited Companies and the petitioner Nos. 4 & 5 are the Directors of the petitioner Nos. 1-3. The Bihar State Industrial Development Corporation Limited (respondent No. 2) and the Asiatic Oxygen Limited (petitioner No. 1) and its associates had entered into a collaboration agreement in January 1975 to set up a joint sector unit for manufacturing industrial gases at Jamshedpur and for that purpose a company, namely, the Bihar Air Products Limited (respondent No. 1) was incorporated on 25...
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 10
- 11
- 12
- Next ›
- Last »