Jharkhand Court March 2006 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Jharkhand Cristian Minority Educational Institutions Association Vs. t ...
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Mar-22-2006
Reported in: [2006(2)JCR378(Jhr)]
M.Y. Eqbal, J.1. Heard the parties.2. In this writ petition the petitioner, who is Christian Minority Educational Institution prayed for quashing of the order contained in letter dated 26.7.2005 issued by Joint Secretary, Human Resources Development Department, Government of Jharkhand whereby the concerned authority while sanctioning the arrears of salary due to the teaching and non-teaching employees of Minority Secondary Schools have imposed a ban on appointment on Minority Schools. It appears that a similar condition was imposed by the respondents, vide order dated 21.9.2004. The petitioner challenged the said order by filing W.P.(C) No. 252 of 2005. The writ petition was disposed of on 17.5.2005 by passing the following order.Heard the parties.Reference may be made to the order dated 12.5.2005, which reads as under:This Court by order dated 31.1.2005 directed the State counsel to seek instruction and file counter affidavit but till date no counter affidavit has been filed. The peti...
Dinesh Prasad Sinha and Vs. the Bihar State Electricity Board,
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Mar-22-2006
Reported in: [2006(2)JCR388(Jhr)]
S.J. Mukhopadhaya, J.1. This writ petition has been preferred by the above two petitioners for a direction on the respondents to modify the final gradation list of Assistant Executive Engineers, issued on 9th October, 1999, wherein, these petitioners have been shown at serial Nos. 173 and 174 respectively. According to the petitioners, they should have been placed at serial Nos. 105 (petitioner No. 1) and at serial No. 5 (petitioner No. 2) in the final gradation list dated 9th October, 1999. Their grievance is that the respondents have treated those, placed above them, as a separate group of Assistant Executive Engineers, in gross violation of Clause (2) of Notification No. 1449 dated 14th August, 19862. The petitioners were initially appointed as Junior Accounts Clerks in May, 1972 under the then Bihar State Electricity Board (hereinafter to be referred as the 'B.S.E.B'). While in service, they passed the Degree in Engineering Examination; 1st petitioner passed B.Sc.(Mechanical) Engin...
Bishnu Kumar Choubey Vs. Smt. Shanti Devi and Smt. Shanti Devi and anr ...
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Mar-22-2006
Reported in: AIR2006Jhar92; [2006(3)JCR105(Jhr)]
1. These second appeals are between the same parties having common grounds and in respect of same suit premises, against a common judgment and decree of affirmance dated 30.1.2006 passed by the learned Additional District Judge- VIII, Dhanbad. By the impugned judgment and decree, the lower Appellate Court has upheld all the findings of learned Trial Court including the findings on the right, title, relationship between the parties, default and personal necessity which are all in favour of the landlady-respondent. 2. The relevant facts in brief is that the landlady-respondent-Shanti Devi acquired the suit house and adjoining land comprised of two Holdings being Old Holding No. 204 (New Holding No. 126) and Old Holding No. 205 (New Holding No. 127) by virtue of a registered sale-deed dated 16.10.86. The defendant-tenant(s) Chandradeep Choubey (deceased) and his son Vishnu Kr. Choubey, who were occupying the said Holdings on monthly rent of Rs. 80/- & 50/- respectively, were informed abou...
Ratan Kumar Mishra and Ram Swarup Singh Vs. Bihar State Housing Board ...
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Mar-22-2006
Reported in: AIR2006Jhar80; [2006(2)JCR200(Jhr)]
R.K. Merathia, J.1. These analogous writ petitions were heard together and are being disposed of by this common judgment.2. Petitioners claim that they being office bearers of 'Janta Row House Sangharsh Samittee, Adityapur, Jamshedpur', have filed these writ petitions in representative capacity. Accordingly, reference to the 'petitioners' hereinafter will mean all such persons, whose case is similar to the petitioners.3. Petitioners' contention is that at the time of issuing allotment letters in 1995, the respondent-Housing Board could not ask them to pay higher price of house, than the price which was prevailing at the time of deposit of earnest money by them in 1989. The houses were ready but allotment letters were issued to the petitioners after about six years i.e. in 1995. The Housing Board admitted in the counter affidavit that it could not organize lottery till 1995 as several antisocial elements who were in unauthorized occupation since 1983, were creating hindrance. Housing Bo...
Naveen Kumar Singh and ors. Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors.
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Mar-22-2006
Reported in: [2006(3)JCR92(Jhr)]
ORDER1. Pursuant to the Advertisement No. 2 of 2004 for appointment on the post of constable driver for different districts, the appellants applied; appeared in tests and they were declared successful when the result was published in the newspaper on 29th May 2005. The said result was subsequently revised and published in the newspaper dated 23rd August, 2005, wherein the appellants were not declared as successful candidates.2. Faced the aforesaid situation, the appellants preferred the writ application challenging the revised result published on 23rd August 2005. The learned Single Judge dismissed the writ petition on the ground that the appellants did not possess the requisite qualification i.e. licence for driving heavy vehicle. According to the learned Counsel for the appellants there was no such provision made either in the advertisement or in the rule that a person for appointment as constable driver should possess licence for driving heavy vehicle. The learned Single Judge has d...
Pushpa Soren Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors.
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Mar-22-2006
Reported in: [2006(4)JCR423(Jhr)]
ORDERS.J. Mukhopadhaya, J.1. This writ petition has been preferred by the petitioner against the Order No. 1263 dated 18th August, 2005, issued by the District Superintendent of Education, Godda, by which the services of petitioner have been terminated.2. It appears that the respondents have terminated the services of petitioner on the ground that she was not qualified at the time of appointment, she having not passed the Teachers' Training Examination.3. Fact of the case is that pursuant to advertisement published by Jharkhand Public Service Commission in August, 2002, the petitioner applied for appointment as Primary Teachers. The petitioner was undergoing two years' Primary Teachers' Training Course from Ursuline Primary Teachers' Training College, Lohardaga. She having come out successful in the written test was appointed on 16th February, 2004. Later on, it having come to the notice of the respondents that she had not passed the Teachers' Training Examination at the time of appoin...
Bishwanath Pathak and Vs. State of Bihar and ors.
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Mar-22-2006
Reported in: [2006(4)JCR665(Jhr)]
R.K. Merathia, J.1. These two similar writ petitions were heard together and are being disposed of by this common order.2. Petitioners' contention is that they were/are entitled to the pay-scale admissible to the Head Master of Middle School, with effect from 3.12.1979. as they were working as Incharge Head Master at different places. It is further contended that there has been discrimination in asmuch as similarly situated junior teachers were given B.A. Trained Scale from due date, but it was not given to the petitioners from due date. It was further submitted that the petitioners have retired during pendency of this writ petition.3. The stand of the State in the counter affidavit is that the teachers, who passed B.A. before 31.12.1978, were given promotion from I.A. Trained Scale to B.A. Trained Scale. Petitioner passed B.A. in 1979. Only the teachers, who got I.A. Trained Scale, were eligible for B.A. Trained Scale and no teacher was given direct promotion from Matric Trained Scale...
Ram Chandra Ram Vs. the State of Jharkhand and ors.
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Mar-21-2006
Reported in: [2006(2)JCR332(Jhr)]
S.J. Mukhopadhaya, J.1. This writ petition has been preferred by petitioner against the notification No. 7260 dated 31st December, 2005 issued by the State of Jharkhand, whereby and where under, 7th respondent, Vijay Kumar has been posted as Assistant Engineer, Rural Engineering Organisation (REO for short), Works Subdivision, Deoghar.2. According to the petitioner, the notification No. 7260 dated 31st December, 2005 so far it relates to 7th respondent, is bad in law, he having been posted against a post which is not vacant, as the petitioner has already joined and functioning against the said post of Assistant Engineer, REO, Works Subdivision, Deoghar.3. It appears that the petitioner, Ram Chandra Ram; 7th respondent, Vijay Kumar and others were transferred on 30th December, 2003. The 7th respondent, who was posted as Assistant Engineer, REO, Works Subdivision, Madhupur (Deoghar), was transferred vide Notification No. 9622 dated 30th December, 2003 and posted as Assistant Engineer, RE...
Employers in Relation to the Management of Kusunda Colliery of B.C.C.L ...
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Mar-21-2006
Reported in: [2006(2)JCR203(Jhr)]
R.K. Merathia, J.1. Heard.2. The petitioner has challenged the undated award pronounced in the month of August, 1996, by Presiding Officer, Central Government Industrial Tribunal (No. 2), Dhanbad, in Reference Case No. 153 of 1993, on the following reference:Whether the demand of Dalit Mazdoor Sangh for employment of the dependents of Smt. Pancha Kamin, Dhrupalia Kamin, Mana Kamin, Baishakshi Kamin, Bali Kamin, Phulmani Kamin and Dugenija Kamin and also for employment of S/Shir Ramphal Turi, Meghu Turi, Barho Bhuiya, Putu Munda and Mantu Bouri is justified? If so, to what relief the workmen are entitled?3. The case of the Union inter alia was that on 30.6.1975, the Management stopped the concerned workmen from the work abruptly and illegally. The Management agreed to provide employment to those workmen who had put seventy-five days attendance during any of the calendar year between 1973-1976, pursuant to which, the concerned workmen represented before the Management but no employment w...
Sunny Konark Construction Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors.
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Mar-21-2006
Reported in: AIR2006Jhar79; [2006(2)JCR198(Jhr)]
S.J. Mukhopadhaya, J.1. The writ petition was preferred by the petitioner for direction on 1st to 6th Respondents to re-decide and reconsider the bid submitted by the petitioner, as also the 7th and 8th Respondents for allotment of work order in relation to Item Nos. 3 and 4 of Notice Inviting Tender (NIT) No. 2/2004-05. It was submitted that though the petitioner was the lowest bidder, but none of the works aforesaid has been given to it.2. 1st to 6th Respondents have appeared. In their counter affidavit, they have given the details of manner in which tender papers were opened and the work order was allotted. According to them, there were four bidders, who were found eligible in respect to Item No. 3 and all of them have quoted same rate i.e. 15% below the estimated value. Out of four bidders, three were local. Out of them, the petitioner, one of the local bidders, submitted that they will complete the work within five months. Recommendation was, accordingly, made to the higher author...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »