Jharkhand Court October 2006 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Ashok Kumar Bose Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Oct-10-2006
Reported in: [2006(4)JCR666(Jhr)]
R.R. Prasad, J.1. The sole appellant, Ashok Kumar Bose having been found in possession of heroin, was put on trial to face charge under Section 20(b)(ii) of Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985. The learned trial Court having found the appellant guilty for the said charge, convicted him and consequently sentenced him to undergo R.I. for 10 years and also to pay a fine of Rs. one lakh.2. The case of the prosecution is that on 29.7.1996 at about 12.30 p.m., a secret information was received by Sub-Inspector, Shiv Prakash Kumar (PW 2) that one person near a water tank at Purana Bazar, has been selling some narcotic substance and there young persons have assembled there for purchasing the same. On getting such information it was entered into the station diary and then he along with other police personnel, namely, Kanchan Kumar (PW 1), Sheikh Sabir (PW 3), Raji Ahamad (PW 4) and Constable Raj Narain Singh proceeded to that place and when they reached that place at about 1 p....
Sushil Prasad Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors.
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Oct-10-2006
Reported in: II(2007)DMC225; [2007(1)JCR512(Jhr)]
ORDERM. Karpagavinayagam, C.J.1. The order dated 9.6.2000, granting maintenance to the wife, the opposite party No. 2, is under challenge before this Court by the husband petitioner.2. It is stated by the counsel for the petitioner that even though the order has been passed on 9.6.2000 directing the petitioner, alleged husband, to pay the maintenance1, the petitioner came to know about the said order only on 7.10.2004 on which date the wife (opposite party No. 2) filed an application before the trial Court to remand him in respect of maintenance case where it was alleged that maintenance amount has not been paid. Only after coming to know of the proceeding under Section 125, CrPC in which ex parte order was passed, the petitioner chose to file the revision before this Court.3. Since, there was delay of four years and odd, an application has been filed to condone the delay and the said delay was condoned. Now, the main contention urged by the counsel for the petitioner is that he was no...
Fulchu @ Jeet Goswami Vs. State of Jharkhand and anr.
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Oct-09-2006
Reported in: [2007(1)JCR507(Jhr)]
ORDERM. Karpagavinayagam, C.J.1. Heard.2. This revision is directed against the order refusing to grant bail to the petitioner under Section 167(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The short facts are as follows:The occurrence took place on 19th February, 2006. According to the prosecution, two accused persons, namely Ranjit Rewani and Deepak Chouhan along with two other accused came to the house of the deceased and fired shot on one Anil Kumar Yadav and Sanjay. On the way to hospital, the said Anil Kumar Yadav died and Sanjay Kumar got treated in the hospital. The case was registered on the complaint given by the brother of Anil Kumar Yadav for the offence under Section 326/307/302/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. As far as petitioner is concerned, it is stated that he came to the house of the deceased in another vehicle and when the other accused fired shot at the injured and deceased, in side the house, he was waiting outside the house. He was arrested a...
Court on Its Own Motion Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Oct-09-2006
Reported in: [2007(1)JCR502(Jhr)]
1. This criminal writ proceeding has been suo motu initiated on the report of the Registrar General dated 7.10.2006. It appears that on the basis of a news item published in the newspaper dated 6.10.2006 mentioning that the A.C.J.M., Garhwa, Shri B.K. Mishra has recalled the warrant of arrest issued against the accused of Meral P.S. Case No. 89/2006, Bhawnathpur. P.S. Case No. 132/2005 and Bhawnathpur P.S. Case No. 53/2006.2. The records of all the aforesaid three cases were called for. We have perused the records. It appears that on the basis of the requisition filed in the Court by the Investigating officers of all the aforesaid three cases, warrants of arrest were issued against the non-appearing accused persons. It further appears that accused Bhanu Pratap Shahi, MLA. Bhawnathpur constituency, is accused along with others in all the three cases. It further appears that in one of the cases i.e. Bhawnathpur P.S. Case. 53/2006 the accused Shri Shahi moved for anticipatory bail before ...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- Next ›