Jharkhand Court September 2005 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Deo Darshan Singh Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors.
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-01-2005
Reported in: [2005(4)JCR373(Jhr)]
ORDERS.J. Mukhopadhaya, J.1. The petitioner has challenged the Notification Nos. Ru-De-4(Sta)-389/2,001-3377 and Ru-De-4(Sta)-389/2001-3351, dated 29th June, 2005, whereby and whereunder, he has been transferred from the post of Assistant Engineer, Rural Development (Special Division), Hazaribagh to the post of Assistant Engineer, Rural Development (Special Division), Palamau.2. The main grievance of the petitioner was that the notifications of transfer were issued not on the recommendation of any Establishment Committee but for some other consideration. 3. The case was earlier taken up and notice was issued on 6th respondent, Md. Alimuddin, who was posted in place of petitioner 6th respondent has already appeared.4. Counsel for the State submitted that the matter having been reconsidered, fresh notification has been issued on 29th August, 2005 cancelling the transfer orders of both the petitioner and 6th respondent; this writ petition has become infructuous. It is submitted that thoug...
Raj Bhuwan Singh Vs. Steel Authority of India and ors.
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-01-2005
Reported in: [2005(4)JCR381(Jhr)]
ORDERM.Y. Eqbal, J.1. In this writ application the petitioner has challenged the Statement of Account of Superannuation Benefits Fund wherein petitioner's date of superannuation has been mentioned as 22.8.2003 assuming the date of birth of the petitioner as 22.8.1943.2. The petitioner joined the service of the respondents on 22.08.1973. The date of birth of the petitioner, was recorded as 2.4.1951 (22 Years). Hence the date of superannuation was fixed as 22.08.2009. The petitioner was performing his job as crane operator. In all the papers maintained by the respondent-Management the date of birth of the petitioner was entered as 2.04.1951. In the Medical Book issued in favour of the petitioner and also in the LTC/LLTC the date of birth of the petitioner has been mentioned as 2.04.1951. All of a sudden the petitioner was shocked to find the Statement of Account of Superannuation Benefit wherein the date of superannuation has been mentioned as 22.08.2003 instead of 22.08.2009.3. When thi...
State of Bihar (Now Jharkhand) and ors. Vs. the Presiding Officer, Lab ...
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-01-2005
Reported in: [2006(1)JCR289(Jhr)]; (2006)IILLJ346Jhar
Altamas Kabir, C.J.1. These two appeals arise out of two writ petitions, being CWJC No. 6138 of 1996-R and CWJC No. 4803 of 1997-R, disposed of by a common judgment dated 24th June, 2003, passed by a learned Single Judge of this Court.2. The respondents in CWJC No. 6138 of 1996-R had invoked the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, for regularization of their services. According to the said respondents, they were all workmen appointed between the years 1980 to 1983 on daily wages under the Executive Engineer, Water Resources, Irrigation Department, Irrigation Division, Deoghar in various capacities, such as chowkidars, Night Guard, Typists, Tracers, Helpers, etc. It was also their case that they had continuously rendered service as permanent staff, but had not been given the benefits and status of permanent employees, nor were they being paid as per the principles of equal pay for equal work. Consequently these workmen invoked the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, ...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- Next ›