Jharkhand Court December 2005 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Chander Mehta Vs. Jharkhand State Electricity Board and ors.
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Dec-02-2005
Reported in: [2006(1)JCR295(Jhr)]
ORDERR.K. Merathia, J.1. Pursuant to the last order, Mr. Jayant Prasad, Deputy Director of Accounts, Dumka is present. Heard.2. The only dispute in this case is with regard to payment of statutory interest on provident fund amount. Petitioner's contention is that he should be paid up to the preceding month of payment, whereas, Board's case is that it is to be paid for maximum six months after retirement.3. Admittedly, petitioner retired in the month of April. 2003 but the provident fund amount was sanctioned only on 25.2.2004 (Annexure-3) in which interest was calculated for six months after the month of retirement i.e. up to October, 2003. There is nothing to show that petitioner was at fault at any stage for the delay in payment.4. Learned counsel appearing for JSEB, with reference to Rule 14(4) of the Bihar GPF Rules, submitted that interest was payable only for a period of six months from the date of retirement, if it was not paid within six months, but he could not show anything t...
Shyamlal Prasad Atul Vs. Jharkhand State Electricity Board and ors.
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Dec-02-2005
Reported in: [2006(1)JCR351(Jhr)]
ORDERS.J. Mukhopadhaya, A.C.J.1. This writ has been preferred by the petitioner for a direction on the respondents to pay him the retiral benefits including 90 percent pension, GSS gratuity, leave encashment and other dues, such as transfer T-A and medical reimbursement amount.2. It appears that the petitioner retired from service of the Jharkhand State Electricity Board (hereinafter referred to as the JSEB) as Additional Electrical Engineer, Electric Supply Area Dhanbad, on 31st December, 2001. A departmental proceeding was initiated against him, which could not come to an end by the date he retired.3. Learned Counsel for the petitioner informed that a penal order of deduction of 10 percent pension has been passed by the authority, but no such order has been enclosed.4. In the facts and circumstances, without giving any finding on merit, the case is remitted to the Secretary, JSEB, Ranchi, to decide the question of payment of the aforesaid retiral benefits and other dues as claimed by...
Lalita Singh Vs. Jharkhand State Electricity Board and ors.
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Dec-01-2005
Reported in: [2006(1)JCR345(Jhr)]
N.N. Tiwari, J.1. Heard learned Counsel for the parties.2. In this writ application the petitioner has prayed for a direction to the respondents to pay the death cum retirement benefits of her husband and for compassionate appointment of her son, Raju Singh.3. It has been submitted that petitioner's husband was an accountant assistant in the services of the Board, who died in harness on 11.9.2004. After his death, the petitioner was entitled to get death cum retiral benefits and other admissible dues but the same has not been paid. It is stated that amount on several heads has already been sanctioned by the competent authority but the payment has not been made to the petitioner till date. It has also been submitted that matter of compassionate appointment of the petitioner's son is pending before the authorities since long but the same also has not been disposed of till date.4. Mr. R. Krishna, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents, submitted that steps have already bee...
Ashok Kumar Singh Vs. Jharkhand State Electricity Board and ors.
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Dec-01-2005
Reported in: [2006(1)JCR346(Jhr)]
ORDERN.N. Tiwari, J.1. Heard learned Counsel for the parties.2. In this writ application the petitioner has prayed for a direction to the respondents to make payment of his admitted retiral dues including the amount of group saving scheme, leave encashment, general provident fund, arrears of difference of pay, arrears of pension and other retiral dues with interest.3. It has been sated that the petitioner retired on 31st January, 2005 from the post of sectional clerk (Super Selection Grade) Electric Supply Sub-Division, Jasidih and (sic) after his retirement he has submitted all the requisite documents/ relevant papers etc. It is also stated that leave encashment amount has already been sanctioned by the competent authority but in spite of the same, the amount has not been paid to the petitioner.4. Learned Counsel appearing for the respondents submitted that steps have been taken, for payment of all admitted retiral dues to the petitioner and amount on several heads have already been s...
Khedan Saw Vs. Secretary Jseb and ors.
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Dec-01-2005
Reported in: [2006(1)JCR370(Jhr)]
ORDERAmareshwar Sahay, J.1. Heard.2. With the consent of the parties this writ application is being disposed of at the stage of admission itself.3. The grievance of the petitioner in this writ application is that he retired as Line Man on 28/2/2005 but he has not received any pension from March 2005 to July 2005, Gratuity, GPF, Leave Encashment and other benefits in spite of the representation made by him to the G.M.-cum-Chief Engineer, Electrical Supply Area, Hazaribagh.4. Considering the above facts and circumstances of the case, this writ application is being disposed of with a direction to the petitioner to file a fresh representation stating in detail about his claim to the General Manager-cum-Chief Engineer, Electrical Supply Area, Hazaribagh within a period of two weeks from today. If such a representation is filed by the petitioner within the aforesaid period, the General Manager-cum-Chief Engineer, Electrical Supply Area, Hazaribagh shall consider the claim of the petitioner a...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Next ›