Jharkhand Court November 2005 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Smt. Rikta Mazumdar Vs. Bharat Coking Coal Ltd. and ors.
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Nov-18-2005
Reported in: [2006(2)JCR361(Jhr)]
ORDERS.J. Mukhopadhaya, A.C.J.1. This writ petition was preferred by the petitioner against order dated 11th July, 2005 (Annexure-10) passed by the 2nd respondent, Director (Personnel), Bharat Coking Coal Limited, whereby she has been ordered to be treated as a General Mazdoor Category-I, Lodna Area, and also ordered to be paid the difference of wags of Clerk-Grade III, for the period when the petitioner worked as clerk/typist.2. According to the petitioner, she was made to work as clerk/typist and the respondents took work of the said post from the petitioner and after she made grievance, the respondents reverted her as a General Mazdoor Category-I. In the present case, there is nothing on the record to show or suggest that the petitioner was appointed as a clerk/typist. Documents enclosed suggest that the petitioner was engaged as a Mazdoor Category-I at Lodna Area and for certain period, she was performing the duties of a Clerk-Typist. The petitioner had approached this Court in WP(...
Sanchi Chamar Vs. Central Coalfields Ltd. and ors.
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Nov-18-2005
Reported in: [2006(1)JCR219(Jhr)]
ORDERM.Y. Eqbal, J.1. The matter relates to compassionate appointment. Petitioner's seeks appointment on compassionate ground. In 2002 the respondent-management informed the petitioner that the death certificate of his father was doubtful as death certificate of his father was obtained from two different districts. The petitioner again tried to convince the respondent-authority the actual place of death of his father. The respondent by letter dated 24.5.2003 entertained the application of the petitioner and directed him to submit the original death certificate. It is stated by the petitioner that death certificate was submitted in 2003, but no decision has been taken.2. Admittedly petitioner's father died in 1999. The last correspondence made between the parties was in 2003. The instant writ petition has been filed in 2005. Moreover, more than six years have passed from the date of death of the petitioner's father. The claim of the petitioner has become belated one, so no relief can be...
Bmw Industries Ltd. Vs. Bihar Credit and Investment Corporation Ltd. a ...
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Nov-17-2005
Reported in: [2006(1)JCR233(Jhr)]
ORDERS.J. Mukhopadhaya, A.C.J.1. This writ petition has been preferred by the petitioner for a direction on the 1st respondent Bihar Credit and Investment Ltd., Patna (hereinafter to be referred as 'BICICO') not to hand over the assets and property of M/s. G.R. Magnates (P) Ltd., situated at Phase VII, Adityapur Industrial Area, Adityapur, Jam-shedpur since the petitioner claims to have filed a tender for purchase of the said property before the 2nd respondent Bihar State Financial Corporation, Patna (hereinafter to be referred as 'BSFC'). Further prayer has been made for a declaration that the sale of property and assets of M/s. G.R. Magnates (P) Ltd., situated at Adityapur Industrial Area, Adityapur, Jamshedpur, by BICICO is null and void, as according to the petitioner, the property belongs to BSFC regarding which tender for auction sale has been called for.2. According to the petitioner, he purchased tender paper on 8th December, 2004 from BSFC after payment of Rs. 50/-for purchasi...
Dr. Harihar Das Vs. Government of India and ors.
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Nov-17-2005
Reported in: [2006(1)JCR241(Jhr)]
ORDERS.J. Mukhopadhaya, A.C.J.1. This writ petition has been preferred by the petitioner against the order, bearing reference No. CIL-C5A (VI)/50708/G/362, dated 8th November, 2001, whereby and whereunder, the respondent Chief General Manager (Personnel), Coal India Limited, Kolkata (hereinafter to be referred as 'CIL') has rejected the representation of the petitioner for payment of pension and pensionery benefits since 1st January, 1992 and thereby refused to modify the earlier order dated 8th January, 1993, whereby, pensionery benefits of the petitioner was freezed.2. The petitioner had, in fact, earlier moved before Ranchi Bench of Patna High Court in C.W.J.C. No. 2469 of 1997 (R) for payment of pension, including dearness relief on pension as per Central Dearness Scheme. A Bench of this Court by its Judgment dated 28th September, 2001 directed the respondents to take a final decision in respect to the claim of the petitioner and to pass reasoned order, whereinafter, the impugned o...
Kamaljeet Singh Ahluwalia Vs. the State of Bihar Through the Secretary ...
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Nov-16-2005
Reported in: AIR2006Jhar44; 2006(1)BLJR107; [2006(1)JCR70(Jhr)]
R.K. Merathia, J.1. Nobody appears for the petitioner. Mr. Modi, learned GP I appears for the State.2. This writ petition was filed for restraining the respondents from interfering with the mining activities of the petitioner on the area broken up prior to 25.10.1980 i.e. prior to coming into force of the Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980 and to allow the petitioner to continue the mining activities on the broken up area and also for movement of vehicles carrying minerals till the subsistence of the extended period of the lease.3. According to the petitioner one M/s. Karamchand Thapar and Sons was granted a mining lease for minerals Iron Ore and Manganese Ore over an area of 320 acres in village Bariaburu and Tatiba on 05.09.1969 for a period of 20 years. The State Government permitted the said lessee to assign the lease in favour of the petitioner for which a registered- indenture was entered into by and between the said lessee and the petitioner became mining lessee under the State for...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- Next ›