Jharkhand Court October 2005 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Ramchandra Ravidas and ors. Vs. State of Bihar (Now Jharkhand) and ors ...
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Oct-26-2005
Reported in: 2006(1)BLJR96; [2006(1)JCR186(Jhr)]
S.J. Mukhopadhaya, A.C.J.1. As all these cases relate to appointment of Technical Assistants in the Animal Husbandry and Fishery Department and similar orders of termination are under challenge, they were admitted for hearing, heard together and are being disposed of by this common judgment.2. Petitioners in all the three writ petitions have challenged the order, contained in Letter No. 5530 dated 23rd October, 1998, whereby and whereunder. the respondent State of Bihar directed the Director, Animal Husbandry, Bihar. Patna to terminate the services of those Technical Assistants who were appointed illegally.Petitioner Ramesh Kumar Singh of CWJC No. 3639 of 2000 (R) has further challenged the consequential order, contained in Letter No. 4821 dated 16th September, 2000, whereby and whereunder the Director, Animal Husbandry, Bihar, Patna, giving reference to the order contained in Letter No. 5530 dated 23rd October, 1998, directed the Regional Director, Animal Husbandry Ranchi/Dumka, to te...
Ram Kumar Vs. State of Bihar and anr.
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Oct-26-2005
Reported in: IV(2006)BC562; [2006(1)JCR99(Jhr)]
Amareshwar Sahay, J.1. The petitioner has prayed for quashing of the order dated 06.04.1998 taking cognizance under Section 409 of the Indian Penal Code against the petitioner in C/l Case No. 136 of 1998 and also the entire criminal prosecution against him which was pending before the Judicial Magistrate, Jamshedpur.2. The opposite party No. 2, Jamshedpur Co-operative House Building Society Ltd. filed a Complaint Case against the Manager, Canara Bank, Safdarganj Development Area, New Delhi before the Chief Judicial Magistrate at Jamshedpur. In short, the allegations in the complaint petition was that the complainant entered into an agreement on 09.09.1992 with M/s. Walia Construction (Builders) of New Delhi for construction of multi-storied buildings at Jamshedpur. It was alleged that the accused executed Bank Guarantee No. 317/ 95, dated 12.12.1995 for Rs. l,00,000/-. Bank Guarantee No. 318/95, dated 12.12.1995 for Rs. 2,00,000/- and Bank Guarantee No. 319/95 dated 12.12.1995 for Rs. ...
Dr. Junul Bhengraj Vs. Sri A.K. Sengupta, Special Judge, Cbi (Ahd) and ...
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Oct-26-2005
Reported in: [2006(1)JCR197(Jhr)]
ORDERS.J. Mukhopadhaya, J.1. This civil contempt petition has been preferred by petitioner, Dr. Junul Bhengraj under Sections 2(b), 12, 16 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, read with Article 215 of the Constitution of India for initiating a contempt proceeding and to prosecute a Judicial Officer.2. The petitioner is an accused in different animal husbandry Scam cases, commonly known as 'Fodder Scam' cases. The main allegation of the petitioner is that he will not get justice from the O.P. No. 1, Special Judge, CBI, Ranchi as, according to him, the said Judge has committed contempt of Courts. After filing of the case, an objection was raised by the office of this Court pointing out defects. One of objections was made that a Judicial Officer cannot be impleaded as a party so his name should be deleted. There are other defects pointed out by the office.3. All the defects having not been removed, the case was taken up by the Registry and was placed before the Lawazima Board of Joint Reg...
Saraswati Ekka Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors.
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Oct-25-2005
Reported in: [2006(1)JCR310(Jhr)]
ORDERM.Y. Eqbal, J.1. The petitioner, who is a lady teacher and belongs to Scheduled Tribe community, was posted in the Scheduled Caste Residential Girls High School, Kamre, in the District of Ranchi. Considering her seniority and the fact that she is a tribal lady, the Welfare Department, Government of Jharkhand issued a notification dated 29.6.2005 whereby she was transferred as Head Mistress (Incharge) against the vacant sanctioned post in Schedule Caste Residential Girls High School, Kundi, Khunti. By the said notification, .respondent No. 6 who is posted in Scheduled Caste Residential Girls High School, Kundi, Khunti as Head Master (Incharge) was transferred to Schedule Caste Residential Girls High School, Nakti Kathikund, Dumka: The said notification was issued by the Establishment Committee in accordance with rules and all those teaches transferred by the said notification were directed to assume their charges within 15 days from the date of receipt of the letter. Consequently, ...
Branch Manager, National Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. SwadhIn Karjee
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Oct-25-2005
Reported in: II(2004)ACC712; I(2006)ACC562; 2006ACJ1536; 2006(1)BLJR113; [2006(1)JCR108(Jhr)]
ORDERM.Y. Eqbal, J.1. This appeal is directed against the judgment and award dated 21.12.2002 passed by 1st Additional District Judge-cum-Motor Vehicle Accident Claim Tribunal Saraikela, in Compensation Case No. 43 of 1997 whereby a sum of Rs. 1,92,000/- was awarded being compensation on account of death of late Umesh Karji and married son of original claimant/appellant, namely. Munsi Karji.2. The claim case was filed by Munsi Karji, father and Laxmi Karji Grand mother of the deceased. Both the claimants died during pendency of the claim application and the present appellant who was the son of claimant Munsi Kajrji was substituted in their place.3. The fact of the case in short is that the deceased Umesh Karji who was aged about 20 years was working as Khalasi in Maxi-taxi bearing registration No. BR-18-6117. The said vehicle met with an accident on 1.2.1997 while it was coming from Kandra to Saraikella. In the said accident the deceased received multiple injuries and succumbed to the ...
Court on Its Own Motion Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Oct-24-2005
Reported in: [2006(1)JCR230(Jhr)]
Amareshwar Sahay, J.1. This Criminal Revision was instituted at the instance of the Hon'ble the Chief Justice, to decide the legality of the order dated 8.4.2003, passed by Sri Indradeo Mishra, Additional Sessions Judge, F.T.C. No. 1, Chatra, in Sessions Trial No. 73 of 1990, whereby the learned Additional Sessions Judge, allowed the prayer of the accused persons to recall the two eye-witnesses namely, Budhani Devi and Tulsi Ganjhu for further cross-examination by the defence on the ground that the parties have compromised their case outside the Court.2. The facts in short are that a First Information Report being Simaria P.S, Case No. 91/1989 was registered under Section 324, 326, 307, 341/34 of the Indian Penal Code on the basis of the fardbeyan of one Khiru Ganjhu, against the accused Jitan Pathak, Narayan Pathak, Vishwanath Pathak and Dhaneshwar Mistri. It was alleged in the FIR that in the night of 20.9.1989, when the informant Khiru Ganjhu (now deceased) was going to his house al...
Karu Mian Vs. State of Bihar (Now Jharkhand)
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Oct-20-2005
Reported in: [2006(1)JCR239(Jhr)]
Amareshwar Sahay, J.1. The instant appeal is directed against the judgment date 8.4.1992 passed by 3rd Additional Sessions Judge, Deoghar in Sessions Trial No. 10 of 1992, whereby the learned Additional Sessions Judge convicted the appellant Karu Mian for the offence under Section 395 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced him to undergo R.I. for a period of seven years.2. The prosecution case in brief is that in the night of 10/11th April, 1989 at about 10.45 p.m. the informant Uday Shankar Singh @ Chunna Singh, M.L.A., Sarath was returning from Dhanbad to Sarath in his car bearing No. DHB-7612 alongwith Dashrath Prasad Roy, Paresh Chandra Bhokta (PW 1), Umesh Chandra Roy (PW 2). When they reached near Village Pathaljore, (hey found that the road was blocked by putting boulders. The car was being driven by the driver Md. Moiz Khan (PW 3). The driver had to stop the car near the obstruction. As soon as the car stopped 10.12 criminals appeared on the scene and surrounded the car. Therea...
Dr. Masroor Jahan Vs. Ranchi Institute of Neuro-psychiatry and Allied ...
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Oct-19-2005
Reported in: [2005(4)JCR313(Jhr)]
ORDERM.Y. Eqbal, J.1. In this writ petition the petitioner seeks a direction upon the authorities of the respondent Ranchi Institute of Neuro Psychiatry and Allied Sciences (in short RINPAS) to promote her on the post of Associate Professor (Clinical Psychology) with effect from 1.9.2003 and further for quashing the order as contained in letter No. 1535 dated 5.6.2004 and the decision of the Managing Committee of RINPAS declaring the petitioner ineligible for promotion to the said post.2. Petitioner was appointed and joined as Junior Clinical Psychologist (Teaching Post) in the RINPAS. After joining, she did her Ph.D. in Clinical Psychology in February 2000. In June 2000, respondents issued advertisement in the Newspaper inviting application for direct recruitment of Teachers. However, no appointments were made on the basis of the said advertisement and the respondent decided to fill up the vacant posts through promotion. In 2003, the Managing Committee of RINPAS took up the matter of ...
Ambuj Kumar Mandal Vs. Managing Director, Steel Authority of India Ltd ...
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Oct-19-2005
Reported in: [2006(108)FLR298]; [2005(4)JCR311(Jhr)]
M.Y. Eqbal, J.1. Heard Mrs. Vandana Singh, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr. Rajiv Ranjan, learned counsel appearing for the respondents.2. Petitioner by way of the instant writ application prays for quashing the order dated 14.2.2005 passed by Assistant Manager, department of Personnel & Final Settlement, Bokaro Steel Plant, Bokaro whereby he has refused to pay to the petitioner the death-cum-retiral benefits of his late brother on behalf of his two nephews, inspite of being appointed their lawful guardian by the Principal Judge, Family Court, Bokaro.3. The facts of the case lie in a narrow compass :Petitioner's elder brother, namely, late Amar Mandal was an employee of Bokaro Steel Plant. He was married to late Angana Devi and out of the wedlock two sons, namely, Arjun Kumar Mandal and Gautam Kumar Mandal were born. Angana Devi, died leaving behind her two above-named sons. Amar Mandal after the death of his first wife, married another lady, namely, Lata Mandalani,...
Sujan Devi (Smt.) Vs. Bindeshwari Devi (Smt.) and ors.
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Oct-19-2005
Reported in: [2005(4)JCR315(Jhr)]
ORDERM.Y. Eqbal, J.1. Heard Mr. Indrajit Sinha, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Rajendra Prasad, learned counsel for the respondents.2. This application under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is directed against the order dated 10.2.2005 passed by Sub-Judge, VI Dhanbad in Title (Partition) Suit No. 46/2000, whereby he has rejected the petition filed by the plaintiff/petitioner under Order VI, Rule 17, CPC for amendment in the plaint.3. The plaintiff/petitioner filed the aforementioned suit for a decree for partition of his 1/5th share in the suit property and for curving out his share and passing a final decree. During pendency of the suit, a petition under Order VI, Rule 17, CPC was filed. By the said petition a further relief for a decree for cancellation of registered sale deed dated 23.3.1982 executed by defendant No. 5 in favour of defendant No. 6 was sought for. The said prayer for amendment of the plaint was opposed by defendant/respondents by filing rejoinder...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 3
- 4
- Next ›
- Last »