Jharkhand Court August 2004 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Chohan Mahto Vs. Anjani Devi
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-04-2004
Reported in: I(2005)DMC287; [2004(4)JCR91(Jhr)]
Hari Shankar Prasad, J.1. This appeal, at the instance of the appellant, is directed against the judgment and decree dated 11.3.1992 and 24.3.1992 respectively passed in Matrimonial (Title) Suit No. 34/ 1988, whereby and whereunder the Third Additional District Judge, Hazaribagh dismissed the suit.2. Facts of this case lie in narrow compass. The appellant, who is husband of respondent Anjani Devi, filed a matrimonial suit for a decree of divorce on the ground of adultery, cruelty and desertion in accordance with the provisions of Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act (hereinafter referred to as the 'Act'). The appellant was married to the respondent in May, 1978 and after the solemnization of marriage the respondent-wife went to her matrimonial house and lived there peacefully for some, months and after some months, it is alleged, she left her matrimonial house without permission or consent of her husband in 1979 and in, spite of repeated requests she did not come back to her matrimonia...
National Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Kameshwar Prasad and ors.
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-04-2004
Reported in: [2004(4)JCR88(Jhr)]
M.Y. Eqbal and Vishnudeo Narayan, JJ.1. This appeal, at the instance of the appellant-National Insurance Company Limited is directed against the judgment and award dated 8.10.1996 passed by Additional Motor Vehicles Accident Claims Tribunal, Jamshedpur in MJC Case No. 60/1984 whereby he has awarded compensation of Rs. 35,000/- and held that both the owner and the insurer of the pickup van bearing registration No. BHS 6367 along with the owner of Tempo are jointly and severally liable to pay compensation.2. The facts of the case lie in a narrow compass :--It appears that on 9.6.1984 the deceased was returning from Jugsalai along with his family on a tempo bearing registration No. BHN 6679. While the tempo reached near Adityapur, a goods carrying tempo, bearing registration No. BHS No. 6367 came from the opposite direction and suddenly collided head on with the tempo on which the deceased along with his family members were traveling. Due to the said accident the occupants of the tempo su...
National Federation of Insurance Fields Workers of India and anr. Vs. ...
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-03-2004
Reported in: (2005)196CTR(Jharkhand)469; [2005]276ITR127(Jharkhand); [2004(3)JCR568(Jhr)]
P.K. Balasubramanyan, C.J. 1. This writ petition is filed by the National Federation of Insurance Field Workers of India. (Jamshedpur Division) said to be an All India Association of the Development Officers working in the office of the Life Insurance Corporation of India. Though this much is stated in the writ petition and the importance and the objectives of the association are set out, with reference to its constitution, it is not seen specifically pleaded that it is a registered or incorporated association. But since no objection on this ground was raised on behalf of the respondents, we do not think that it is necessary to further pursue the question of the maintainability of the writ petition at its instance.2. In the writ petition, the Association has prayed for a declaration that the conveyance allowance and additional conveyance allowance paid to Development Officers of the Life Insurance Corporation of India, including the Development Officers working with the 17 Branches of ...
Sharat Chandra Sinha Vs. State of Bihar and ors.
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-03-2004
Reported in: [2004(4)JCR149(Jhr)]
ORDERTapen Sen, J.1. Heard Mr. Ajit Kumar Singh, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, who submits that he has been authorized by Mr. Om Prakash, Advocate to appear and conduct arguments on behalf of the petitioner.2. In this writ application, the petitioner prays for a direction upon the respondents to pay salary for the period he has actually worked together with interest. He further makes a prayer for quashing the order as contained in AnneXure-3 which was passed pursuant to the order of the Patna High Court in CWJC No. 5384 of 1998 (Annexure-1). It is evident upon reading the said order dated 7.9.1999 as contained in Annexure-1 that the Patna High Court noticed an appointment letter dated 8.8.1988 (Annexure-2/2 hereof), which is equivalent to Annexure-B appended to the counter affidavit. It is further evident upon perusal of the aforementioned appointment letter, that the petitioner had himself applied for being appointed as Lecturer in Mathematics before the Principle, Deo...
The Management of Delhi Public School Bokaro Steel City Through Its Pr ...
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-03-2004
Reported in: [2005(104)FLR265]; [2004(4)JCR733(Jhr)]; (2005)ILLJ1068Jhar
ORDERP.K. Balasubramanyan, C.J.1. The appellant is the petitioner in W.P. (L) No. 2286 of 2001. It is the Delhi Public School, Bokaro Steel City through its Principal. The School gave employment to one Pratha Mahto in terms of a letter dated 29.10.1990. The letter in- formed Pratha Mahto that he was being offered ad-hoc appointment as a Cook- cum-General duties for the Delhi Public School Students/Staff Facility Centre at Delhi Public School, Bokaro Steel City from 1st October, 1990 to 30th March, 1991 effective from the date of his joining, on a consolidated salary of Rs. 900/- per month. It was also offered that in addition to the pay, he will also be provided free food facilities on all working days. The letter of offer specified that the services of Pratha Mahto will be purely temporary and can be terminated by one month's notice on either side. He was also informed that in case the Students/Staff Facility Centre was to be closed down due to any reason whatsoever during the period,...
National Federation of Insurance Fields Workers of India Vs. Union of ...
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-03-2004
Reported in: [2005]145TAXMAN116(NULL)
P.K. Balasubramanyan, CJ. 1. This writ petition is filed by the National Federation of Insurance Field Workers of India (Jamshedpur Division) said to be an All India Association of the Development Officers working in the office of the Life Insurance Corporation of India. Though this much is stated in the writ petition and the importance and the objectives of the association are set out, with reference to its constitution, it is not seen specifically pleaded that it is a registered or incorporated association. But since no objection on this ground was raised on behalf of the respondents, we do not think that it is necessary to further pursue the question of the maintainability of the writ petition at its instance.2. In the writ petition, the Association has prayed for a declaration that the conveyance allowance and additional conveyance allowance paid to Development Officers of the Life Insurance Corporation of India, including the Development Officers working with the 17 Branches of Ja...
Mumtaz Ahmad Vs. the State of Bihar and ors.
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-02-2004
Reported in: [2005(104)FLR731]; [2004(4)JCR469(Jhr)]; 2005(3)SLJ257(NULL)
Tapen Sen, J.1. Heard Mr. Mr. M.S. Anwar, learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Pradip Modi, learned G.P. I for the State- respondents.2. The petitioner in this case has challenged the order of dismissal from service passed on 28.10.1992 as contained In Annexure 10 by reason whereof he was dismissed with effect from 01.12.1992. The petitioner also challenges the order of the appellate authority passed on 27.06.1993 as contained in Annexure 11, by reason whereof the appeal filed by the petitioner against the aforementioned order dated 28.10.1992 was rejected,3. The fact. which are necessary to be taken note of in the instant case are that while he was in service having been employed as Constable in Ranchi, a departmental proceeding was initiated upon service of a charge-sheet (Annexure 1), whereby and whereunder the following charges were leveled against him :-(i) On 13.09.1990 the petitioner was supposed to have escorted a VIP from the Ranch! Railway Station, but he absente...
Arvind Kumar Mehta Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors.
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-02-2004
Reported in: [2005(3)JCR148(Jhr)]
ORDERR.K. Merathia, J.1. Heard the parties.2. The only grievance of the petitioner is that his two bills amounting to Rs. 24,650/ and 9,775/-, submitted as far back as in the year 2001, have not been paid inspite of his representation made to the concerned Secretary through the Advocate General's Office.3. Learned State counsel submits that the matter will be looked into.4. It is unfortunate that the petitioner, an Advocate of this Court had to file this writ petition for payment of his professional fees, for which he submitted bills as far back as in the year, 2001. If there was any dispute regarding them, the same should have been informed to the petitioner along with admitted payment.5. In the circumstances, respondent No. 2 will look into the matter and do the needful. If the bills are not disputed, the same should be paid. if any part of the bills are disputed, reasons thereof should be communicated to the petitioner. This exercise should be completed within four weeks from the re...
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›