Jharkhand Court October 2004 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
State of Jharkhand and ors. Vs. Arjun Das
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Oct-05-2004
Reported in: 2004(3)BLJR1998; [2004(4)JCR535(Jhr)]
M.Y. Eqbal, J.1. This appeal at the instance of the appellant- The State of Jharkhand is directed against the judgment and order dated 22.8.2003 passed in WP (C) No. 5126 of 2002 whereby the learned single Judge directed the appellants to mutate the name of the petitioner-respondent in respect of the land in question.2. The fact of the case lies in a narrow compass.3. Petitioner-respondent alleged to have purchased raiyati land measuring an are of 3 kathas appertaining to Mouza Dhaiya No. 6. khata No. 119. Plot No. 4051 from one Mohan Manjhi son of Late Gangu Manjhi a scheduled tribe by registered sale-deed dated 2.12.1988. It is stated by the petitioner-respondent that after purchase he came in peaceful possession of the said land and continuing possession since the date of purchase. Petitioner-respondent, therefore filed an application for mutation of the land in question by entering his name in the revenue register but the Circle Office, Dhanbad sat tight over the matter, The petiti...
Kailash Prasad Saha @ Kalu Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Oct-05-2004
Reported in: 2004(3)BLJR1898; 2005CriLJ400; [2004(4)JCR540(Jhr)]
ORDERAmareshwar Sahay, J.1. Heard the parties.2. In this application, the petitioner has prayed for quashing of the order dated 6.9.1999, passed by the Special Judge, Sahibganj, whereby he has taken cognizance against the petitioner for the offence under Sections 7 of the Essential Commodities Act and also the order dated 4.12.2002 passed by Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Rajmahal, framing charge against the petitioner under Section 7 of (.tie Essential Commodities Act.3. On the basis of a written report lodged by the Supply Inspector, Rajmahal, a First information Report was registered against the petitioner and one another, wherein it was alleged that on 19.6.1999, the informant alongwith raiding party. reached the N11 Kothi Ghat and there it was found that the petitioner was loading wheat on a boat of Prasadi Mandal. The petitioner as well as Prasadi Mandal was apprehended. On enquiry, the petitioner admitted that he was the owner of the Wheat, whereas the other accused Prasadi...
Neha Singh Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors.
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Oct-05-2004
Reported in: 2004(3)BLJR1858; [2004(4)JCR542(Jhr)]
ORDERM.Y. Eqbal, J.1. In this writ application the petitioner seeks mandamus directing the respondents to allow her to take admission in the first year of M.B.B.S. Course in the Rajendra Institute of Medical Science. Ranchi for the Sessions 2004-05.2. Petitioner's case is that her father is in the police service in the Unified State of Bihar and presently posted as Inspector of Police at Patna. Petitioner appeared in the Entrance Examination and qualified for the preliminary test and also in the main examination and her position in the merit list is 43. Accordingly, call letter was issued for counseling. Petitioner appeared before the Counseling Board. But her admission was refused on the ground of non-resident of State of Jharkhand. It is contended by the petitioner that candidates upto 46 rank in the merit list got admission in Rajendra Institute of Medical Science, Ranch, and so she is also entitled to admission in the said Institution.3. A counter affidavit has been filed by respon...
Gokuleshwar Banerjee Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Oct-05-2004
Reported in: 2005CriLJ1535; [2004(4)JCR557(Jhr)]
ORDERVishnudeo Narayan, J.1. This appeal at the instance of the appellant stands directed against the impugned judgment and order dated 26.2.2001 and 28.2.2001 respectively passed in R.C. Case No. 6(A)/ 92-D by Shri Raj Narain Prasad Singh. Special Judge, CBI, Dhanbad whereby and whereunder the appellant was found guilty for the offence punishable under Sections 7 and 13(2) read with Section 13(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (hereinafter referred to as the said Act) and he was convicted and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for one year each under Section 7 and Section 13(2) read with Section 13(1)(d) of the said Act and he was also sentenced to pay a fine of Rs. 500/- for the offence under Section 13(2) of the said Act and in default thereof to undergo rigorous imprisonment for three months. However, the sentences were ordered to run concurrently,2. The prosecution case has arisen on the basis of the first information report (Ext. 9) lodged before Delhi Speci...
Niroop Mohanty and anr. and A.K. Choudhary Vs. State of Jharkhand and ...
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Oct-05-2004
Reported in: [2005(104)FLR729]; [2005(1)JCR37(Jhr)]; (2005)IILLJ207Jhar
ORDERS.J. Mukhopadhaya, A.C.J.1. All these applications under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure have been preferred by the two sets of petitioners. The petitioners Niroop Mohanty and Arun Narayan Singh are petitioners in Cr MP Nos. 109/2004, 110/ 2004 and 113/2004 whereas A.K. Choudhary is the petitioner in Cr MP No. 151 of 2004. The petitioners are the Vice President of H.R.M., Deputy Managing Director, Corporate Service and Head of H.R./IR, Tube Division of Tata Iron and Steel Company Ltd. (for short TISCO').2. In Cr MP No. 109/2004 the petitioners have challenged the order dated 19.12.2002 passed in C/2 Case No. 4101/2002, whereby and whereunder, the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jamshedpur has taken cognizance of the offence punishable under Section 22A of the Minimum Wages Act, 1948 against the petitioners and one Imamuddin Khan. In Cr MP No. 110/2004 the petitioners have challenged the order dated 19th December, 2002 passed in C/2 Case No. 4102/2002 by learned Ch...
Panna Lal Chauhan Vs. State of Jharkhand and anr.
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Oct-04-2004
Reported in: [2004(4)JCR555(Jhr)]
ORDER1. The petitioner/appellant filed an application in the year 2000 under Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act for a decree of restitution of conjugal rights. The suit was registered as Title (Matrimonial) Suit No. 4 of 1996. in the said suit, interim order was passed on 21.3.1998 for payment of maintenance pendente lite to the respondent No. 2 at the rate of Rs. 750/-per month besides Rs. l,000/- towards litigation cost. The suit was ultimately dismissed for non prosecution on 26.2.1999. Thereafter, when the appellant did not comply the order for payment of pendente lite maintenance, the respondent No. 2 moved the Court in Criminal Execution Case No. 45 of 2000 for realization of the maintenance amount, which was directed to be paid w.e.f. 1996. The Court below issued distress warrant which was challenged by the appellant in WP (C) No. 3556 of 2001. This Court vide order dated 7.8.2001 declined to interfere with the said order but directed the appellant to appear before the Court be...
Sambat Singh Munda and ors. Vs. State of Bihar
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Oct-01-2004
Reported in: 2005CriLJ1776; [2004(4)JCR346(Jhr)]
Vishnudeo Narayan, J. 1. This appeal at the instance of the appellants stands directed against the impugned judgment and order dated 12.4.1996 and 17.4.1996 respectively passed in S.T. No. 346 of 1994, Trial No. 119 of 1994 by Smt. Shakuntala Sinha, Additional Judicial Commissioner. Khunti (Ranchi) whereby and they found guilty for the offence punishable under Section 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code and they were convicted and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for life.2. The prosecution ease has arisen on the basis of the written report (Ext. 2) of PW 3 Budhram Singh Munda. the informant, lodged before the Officer Incharge, Tamar police station on 17.11.1993 at 20.00 .hours regarding the occurrence which is said to have taken place on that very day at 13.00 hours at Lawaikir, police station Tamar Sub-Division Khunti, District Ranchi. Bansidhar Munda is the deceased in this case and he was engaged by the informant for cutting wood on the alleged day of the occurrence. A case w...
Sita Ram Agarwal and ors. Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors.
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Oct-01-2004
Reported in: [2004(4)JCR552(Jhr)]
ORDERM.Y. Eqbal, J.1. In all these writ petitions the petitioners have challenged the validity of the notices issued to them in various certificate proceedings under Section 7 of the Bihar and Orissa Public Demand Recovery Act (shortly 'the said Act) for realization of rent of the shops in occupation of the petitioners. The petitioners have raised a pure question of law as to whether the Certificate Officer has any authority or jurisdiction to issue notices under Section 7 of the said Act without complying the mandatory requirements of law.2. The petitioners are carrying on business in the open market in the shops allotted to them in the Principal Market Yard. Hazaribagh. The rent of the shops was time to time enhanced and for the recovery of rent respondent No. 3, the Secretary. Agricultural Produce Market Committee, Hazaribagh filed requisitions before the Certificate Officer-cum-Executive Magistrate, Sadar. Hazaribagh and on tile basis of the requisition certificate cases were insti...
Naresh Kumar Gupta Vs. Smt. Jyoti and anr.
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Oct-01-2004
Reported in: II(2005)DMC66; [2005(1)JCR22(Jhr)]
Hari Shankar Prasad, J.1. This appeal at the instance of appellant-plaintiff is directed against the judgment and decree dated 15th February 2000 and 24th February 2000 respectively passed in Title {Matrimonial) Suit No. 2 of 1994 whereby the learned Ist Additional District Judge, Bokaro at Chas dismissed the suit. The aforesaid Title (Matrimonial) Suit was filed for dissolution as well as nullity of marriage under Sections 12(A) and 13(i)(a)(ii) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955.2. The case of the appellant who is the plaintiff at the trial stage is that marriage between appellant-plaintiff and respondent No. 1 was solemnized on 1.3.1993 at Nawada according to the Hindu rites and customs. After the marriage on 2.3.1993 the respondent No. 1 was brought to her matrimonial house and during her stay in her sasural, she did not talk to anybody even with the appellant-plaintiff and whenever the appellant-plaintiff wanted to talk to respondent No. 1, she looked at him with anger as if she is r...
Mahabir Sah @ Mahabir Prasad Sah Vs. Tapan Saha
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Oct-01-2004
Reported in: 2005(1)BLJR586; [2005(1)JCR29(Jhr)]
Hari Shankar Prasad, J.1. This appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 2nd September, 1995 passed by District Judge, Sahebganj in Probate Case No. 2 of 1986/Title Suit No. 16A of 1989 whereby and whereunder the learned Court below granted probate in favour of petitioner-respondent. The appellant was objector-defendant in the aforesaid probate case cum title suit and respondent in this appeal is petitioner-plantiff.2. The fact of the case in brief is that petitioner-respondent filed a petition for grant of probate under Section 276 of the Indian Succession Act, stating therein that one Sabitri Sahuain, widow of late Baijnath Sah died issueless on 29.4.1985 and before her death she executed a Will in favour of the petitioner-respondent. It is stated that at the time of execution of the Will she was of sound mind and possessed a good health and executed the Will on 14.3.1985 out of her free Will in presence of witnesses. It is submitted that original Will was unfortunately...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 5
- Next ›
- Last »