Jharkhand Court June 2003 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Singhbhum Kshetriya GramIn Bank Officer's Association and Ors. Vs. Sin ...
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jun-18-2003
Reported in: [2003(3)JCR192(Jhr)]
S.J. Mukhopadhaya, J.1. The peti-tioners initially challenged the Office Order No. IOM:GEN:SPC:PK:2000-2001/018 dated 10th June, 2000, whereby and whereunder, the respondents circulated the promotion policy for promotion of Officers of Singhbhum Kshetriya Gramin Bank, Chaibasa, West Singhbhum (for short-Gramin Bank) from Junior Management Grade-I (JMG-I) to Middle Management Grade-II (MMG-I1). Prayer was also made to set aside the order dated 7th August, 2000, as contained in Memo No. IOM:GEN:2000-01/029, whereby and whereunder, the respondent Nos. 3 to 12 have been promoted to the higher post of MMG-II.2. The main plea was taken that above mentioned promotion policy has been formulated contrary to the Promotion Rules and Guidelines framed by NABARD and is also contrary to the law laid down by the Supreme Court of India and this Court.3. The respondent Gramin Bank in their affidavit took plea that the norms for promotion of Officers from JMG-I to MMG-II dated 10th June, 2000 (Annexure-...
Employers in Relation to the Management of Nirsa Area of Eastern Coalf ...
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jun-18-2003
Reported in: 2003(2)BLJR1602; [2003(3)JCR189(Jhr)]
S.J. Mukhopadhaya, J.1. Both the petitioners-Management of Nirsa Area of M/s, Eastern Coalfields Ltd. (for short-ECL) and the workmen have preferred the writ petitions against the common award dated 17th January, 1997 passed by the learned Presiding Officer, Central Government Industrial Tribunal No. 1, Dhanbad in Reference No. 43/1990, whereby and whereunder, while he held the action of the Management of Badjna Colliery in denying employment to Basudeo Bhuiyan and 682 others not justified, directed the petitioner management to employ at least 105 to 110 workmen w.e.f. 1979, within two months from the date of publication of award.About 683 workmen sponsored by their Union, i.e., petitioner of CWJC No. 2047 of 1997(R) pleaded that all the 683 workmen as shown in the chart presented by them, were employed in Durga Boka Pahari Colliery, now a part of Badjna Colliery since before nationalization of coal mines in the year 1973. Before nationalization, there was some dispute between one Shri...
Dhena Hansda and ors. Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors.
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jun-18-2003
Reported in: 2003(2)BLJR1605; [2003(3)JCR230(Jhr)]
S.J. Mukhopadhaya, J. 1. The writ petition has been preferred by the petitioners against the appellate order dated 23rd May, 2002 passed by the Divisional Commissioner, Santhal Parganas Division, Dumka, in R.M. Appeal No. 142 of 1997/ 98, whereby and whereunder, the order dated 20th June. 1997 passed by Settlement Officer, Dumka in R.E. Case No. 1 of 1997-98/MP Case No. 53 of 1990 has been set aside.2. The case of the petitioner is that the lands, in question, were recorded in the last survey settlement in the names of their ancestors, who are Scheduled Tribes. The lands are non-transferable, Jamabandi lands of Scheduled Tribes (Santhals). Its acquisition was made in favour of non-tribal ex-landlord, which was illegal,3. It appears that out of 8 Bighas, 16 Kathas and 12 Dhurs of lands of Mouza Sarasdangal disputed 6 Bighas, 13 Kathas and 1 Dhur of Raiyati agricultural lands were acquired by the S.D.O., Dumka in L.A. Case No. 5 of 36-37 in favour of the landlord Noni Gopal Banerjee unde...
Vijay Kumar Singh Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors.
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jun-18-2003
Reported in: [2003(3)JCR256(Jhr)]
ORDERS.J. Mukhopadhaya, J. 1. The petitioner has challenged the original order dated 10th August, 2001 passed by the Divisional Forest Officer (DFO for short), Garhwa in Confiscation Case No. 21/2000; Appellate order dated 25th of February, 2002 passed by the Deputy Commissioner, Garhwa in Confiscation Appeal No. 19/2001 and the revisional order dated 4th December, 2002 passed by the Secretary, Forest Department, Government of Jharkhand in Revision Case No. (C)-11/2002. In the confiscation case, the Respondent DFO, seized the Truck No. BR-15G-1140, apart from forest produce, which was affirmed by the appellate and revisional authorities. 2. The petitioner, who is the owner of the Truck, in question, has challenged the orders on amongst the following grounds : (i) The DFO, Garhwa had no jurisdiction to confiscate the truck, in question, having not delegated with the power. (ii) The notice of confiscation issued to the petitioner and others is not proper, the authority having not disclo...
indu Builders Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors.
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jun-18-2003
Reported in: 2003(2)BLJR1455; [2003(3)JCR360(Jhr)]
ORDERS.J. Mukhopadhaya, J.1. This writ petition has been preferred by the petitioner, Indu Builders through its Partner Sujit Lahiri, for issuance of appropriate writ, order or direction, particularly, a writ in the nature of certiorari for quashing the order dated 14th December, 2002 passed in Misc. Case No. 14 (AAJ 2002 by the Joint Registrar, Cooperative Societies, South Chhotanagpur Division, Ranchi, whereby and whereunder, the application filed by Respondent Nos. 4 and 5 has been allowed and the petitioner has been directed to hand over the flats measuring 911 Sft. and 1200 Sft. to the Respondent Nos. 4 and 5 respectively.2. The main plea taken by the petitioner is that the entire order dated 14th December, 2002 passed by the Respondent No. 2 against the petitioner is absolutely illegal and without jurisdiction.3. According to the petitioner, it is a partnership firm having its office at Jamshedpur and carries out business as consultant, architect, builders, interior designer and ...
Janta Mazdoor Sangh Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jun-18-2003
Reported in: [2003(3)JCR187(Jhr)]
ORDERVikramaditya Prasad, J.1. The question to be answered in this writ petition is whether the refusal of the reference by the Union of India as contained in Annexure-3 can be sustained in law.2. The question aforesaid arose out of the facts that the Janta Mazdoor Sangh, a registered Trade Union, raised a dispute for regularization of the services of 29 of its members on the ground, as stated in the writ petition, that those workers were the members of that Union represented by Mewa Singh, a member of the said Union and they were performing the repairing and maintenance of the broken down machineries as also for transportation of parts of machineries and other materials from surface to underground and from underground to surface. For this purpose, they were issued Cap Lamps and their names were also entered in the Form 'C Register. They had also worked for more than 240/190 days. They made representations for their regularization. Ultimately, conciliation was initiated, the notice of ...
Nageshwar Das Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors.
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jun-18-2003
Reported in: 2003(2)BLJR1549; [2003(3)JCR233(Jhr)]
ORDERS.J. Mukhopadhaya, J. 1. The petitioner has challenged the order dated 1st June, 1996 passed by the Chairman, Bihar State Pollution Control Board (for short-Board), whereby and whereunder, the petitioner was discharged from the services of the Board, some of the allegations having been proved against him.The petitioner has also challenged the order dated 11th April, 1998, whereby and whereunder, the Board rejected the appeal as was preferred by the petitioner against the order of discharge.2. According to the petitioner, the Regional Officer of the Board at Dhanbad, vide his letter No. 1150, dated 24th May, 1995 recommended the Chairman of the Board, Patna to take certain disciplinary action against him on the ground that the petitioner threatened him due to certain minor dispute and for certain action which is unbecoming on the part of a Board employee.The petitioner was asked to submit a show cause by the Member Secretary of the Board, Patna vide letter No. 689 dated 21st June, ...
Anirudha Golder Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors.
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jun-18-2003
Reported in: [2003(3)JCR358(Jhr)]
ORDERS.J. Mukhopadhaya, J.1. This writ petition has been preferred by the petitioner to command the Respondents, particularly, Respondent No. 3, the Deputy Commissioner, Ranchi and Respondent No. 4, the District Welfare Officer, Ranchi to issue 'Duplicate Caste Certificate' in the name of petitioner in the manner as expressed in the prescribed format for Scheduled Caste/Scheduled Tribe of Staff Selection Commission, as the petitioner's original certificate has been lost for which an FIR is stated to have been lodged.2. The case of the petitioner is that his father Sri Amiya Kumar Golder is an immigrant from East Pakistan (now Bangla Desh) who arrived at Mana Camp, Raipur (the then Madhya Pradesh, now Chhatis-garh) on 3rd of August, 1970. His father was issued a 'Caste Certificate' by the Chief Commandant, Mana Camp on 11th July, 1973 indicating his caste as 'Namasudra', which is recognized as a Scheduled Caste under the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribes List (Modification) Order 195...
Suraj Bhuiyan @ Lakar Bhuiyan Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jun-18-2003
Reported in: 2003(2)BLJR1644
Deoki Nandan Prasad and Hari Sharikar Prasad, JJ.1. This Criminal appeal has been directed against the judgment of conviction and order of sentence passed by the learned 1st Additional Sessions Judge, East Singhbhum at Jamshedpur in connection with Sessions Trial No. 323 of 1999 whereby and where under the learned Additional Sessions Judge convicted the appellant under Section 302/34 I.P.C. and sentenced him to undergo R.I. for life.2. The case of the prosecution in brief is that one Smt. Alomoni Devi gave a fardbayan before the police on 19-4-1998 that she has been residing in New Kapali Basti along with his younger brother and her sons Meghnath and Chhotubabu. She is working in the Bunglow of Coty Saheb to maintain herself and her children. Her son was also working in Dumping. Her daughter Ahalya (deceased) was illiterate and unmarried whose marriage was settled with Suraj Bhuiyan with consent of family members of both the parties as there was earlier relation between them. Suraj was...
Mithilesh Kumar and ors. Vs. S. Manoharan and ors.
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jun-18-2003
Reported in: 2003(2)BLJR1458
ORDERS.J. Mukhopadhaya, J.1. Mr. S.N. Pandey, Assistant Manager (Personnel), H.S.C.L., Bokaro is present in the Court. He handed over the following cheques issued in the name of the writ petitioners either personally or through their Counsel, which are mentioned herein below:NameAmount Paid Cheque No. and Dateremarks Rupees (1)Satrughan Sharma :1,20,284.00 520067 -26-5-2003 4,480.96 566903 -4-6-2003 Handed over to Mr. Rajiv Ranjan, Counsel for onward transmission to writ petitioner.(2)Maj. O.K. Mishra 68,804.00 520068 -26-5-2003 6,732,00 566904 -4-6-2003 Handed overto Mr. S.K. Sinha, Counsel for onward transmission to writ petitioner.(3)R.K. Jha1,17,114.00 520069 -26-5-2003 12,681.50 566905 -4-6-2003 Handed over to Mr. Rajiv Ranjan, Counsel for onward transmission to writ petitioner.(4)K.P. Singh :44,214.00 520070 -26-5-2003 16,756.26 566906 -4-6-2003 Handed over to Mr. Rajiv Ranjan, Counsel for onward transmission to writ petitioner. (5)Mithilesh Kumar :1,20,300.00 520071 -26-5-2003 8...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »