Skip to content

Jharkhand Court February 2003 Judgments

Browse smarter

Open an 18-section brief on any judgment

Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.

  • AI Brief & Ask
  • Semantic AI Search
  • Devil's Bench

Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.

Feb 03 2003

Mosabani Mines Labour Union Etc. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr. Etc ...

Court: Jharkhand

Decided on: Feb-03-2003

Reported in: [2003(97)FLR933]; [2003(2)JCR407(Jhr)]; (2003)IILLJ1018Jhar

ORDERS.J. Mukhopadhaya, J.1. As three unions or its members have challenged the common decision incorporated in letter contained in memo No. L-42024/53/2002-I.R. (Misc.) dated 2nd January, 2003 and the notice of closure of units dated 3rd January, 2003, they were heard together and are being disposed of. 2. The brief facts of the case is that the respondents M/s. Hindustan Copper Limited decided to close its 'Surda Copper Mines, Mosabani Concentrator Plant and other allied Departments' situated in the district of Singhbhum (East) w.e.f. 3rd January, 2003. The workmen have been asked either to voluntary retire as per V.R. Scheme or to force retrenchments. 3. Initially for closure of aforesaid Surda Copper Mines, Mosabani Concentrator Plant and others allied Departments', the respondents followed the provisions of Section 25(O) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. The respondent-Hindustan Copper Limited sought for prior permission from the Central Government. The Central Government on h...


Feb 02 2003

Naya Bazar Dukandar Sangh and ors. Vs. Ranchi Regional Development Aut ...

Court: Jharkhand

Decided on: Feb-02-2003

Reported in: [2003(2)JCR1(Jhr)]

Tapen Sen, J.1. Heard Mr. A.K. Sahani, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr. Arvind Kumar, learned counsel for the respondents. 2. The petitioners in the instant case have prayed for quashing the order signed on 21.11.1994 (Annexure-8) passed by the respondent No. 2 (Vice-Chairman, Ranchi Regional Development Authority) by which, it was decided to fix the rents of the shops at Rs. 2.50 per sq. ft. per month. It was further decided that the shops situated inKanke would have a lower scale of rent per sq.ft., i.e., Rs. 2.00 per sq.ft. per month. In other words, the effect of the order was that the rents of shops of Markets and KIOSKS situated in the Ranchi Town area would be at the rate of Rs. 2.50 per sq.ft. per month and that the Kanke Market at the rate of Rs. 2.00 per sq.ft. per month. The rate of rent was made applicable with effect from 1.12.1994. It was further decided that the rates would be revised after every three years. 3. During the course of arguments, Mr. Arvind Kumar...


  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial