Court : Jharkhand
Reported in : 2002(50)BLJR1296
M.Y. Eqbal, J. 1. This appeal under Rules 6 and 9 of the Companies (Court) Rules, 1959 read with Clause 10 of the Letters Patent is directed against the Judgment and order dated 27.9.95 passed in Company petition No. 1/92R whereby the learned Single Judge allowed the petition and ordered that the company-respondent No. 1 be wound up and further directed the Registrar and the official liquidator of the Company to proceed in terms of Section 454 of the Companies Act.2. Petitioners-respondent Nos. 1 and 2 filed a company petition purported to be under Sections 433, 434 and 439 of the Companies Act, 1956 for winding up the appellant-Company and for appointment of official liquidator for the purpose of liquidating the company and for taking possession of the assets of the company and further for a direction restraining respondent No. 3. Bihar State Financial Corporation to auction the appellant-Company unless the Corporation exonerates the petitioners- respondent Nos, 1 and 2 from all liabi...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
Reported in : 2002(50)BLJR1003
ORDER1. This appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 13.2.1997 by which the writ petition filed by the petitioner being CWJC No, 1080/96 (R) was dismissed, The order elated 13.2.1997 passed by learned Single Judge is quoted herein below:--'Heard learned counsel for the parties. This application is dismissed.'2. From perusal of the writ petition, it appears that petitioner/appellant had challenged the order dated 1.2.1995 issued by the Desk Officer of the Ministry of Labour, Government of India refusing to refer the disputes for adjudication by the Tribunal. In the writ petition, the petitioner made out a case that during conciliation proceeding, although petitioner workmen was agreeable for an arbitration both under the Act as well as under the Code of discipline but the Management declined to accept it. Inspite of that without the consent of the petitioner, the matter was sent to the Arbitration. The Desk Officer faking into consideration the code of arbitration refuse...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
Reported in : 2002(50)BLJR1004; [2002(93)FLR1196]; (2002)IIILLJ110Jhar
ORDER1. This appeal is directed against the order dated 24.2.1997 whereby the learned single judge dismissed the writ petition being CWJC No. 2632 of 1996 (R).2. The petitioner's case is that he was appointed as Peon on 4.1.1982 by the Managing Committee of Sosomali High School in Rajnagar Block. In March, 1982 the said High School was taken over by the Government of Bihar and was named as Project High School. Sosomali, It was contended by the petitioner that he worked continuously from 4.1.1982 to 5.4.1996 though he did not receive any salary from the respondents. The petitioner submitted a number of application to the District Education Officer, Singhbhum for considering his case for payment of salary and for regularisation of the salary sheet. In 1996, the District Education Officer, Singhbhum issued an office order dated 5.4.1996 informing the petitioner that his appointment was not approved as at the time of his appointment ie. on 4.1.1982, he was only of 16 years 2 month 25 days ...
Tag this Judgment!