Jharkhand Court April 2002 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Pritam Kaur Vs. State and ors.
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Apr-02-2002
Reported in: 2002(2)BLJR1071
ORDERD.N. Prasad, J.1. This is an application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying therein for issuance of an appropriate writ/order/direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents concerned to show cause as to why under what authority the respondents concerned are not arresting the accused Paramjeet Kaur, respondent No. 4, who is very much present in Jamshedpur and is pursuing legal proceedings in various Courts.2. The respondent No. 4 also intervened in this application and filed an application under Article 226 claiming therein that she is an actual widow of late Jagtar Singh and actually the petitioner is an imposter and has instituted this writ application on false, incorrect and misleading facts. It is further alleged that Paramjit Kaur ran away from the house of Chanchal Singh some time in the year 1980 and since then Paramjit Kaur wife of Awtar Singh has absolutely no connection with either Chanchal Singh or his family members.3. Today, one count...
The Management of Bokaro Steel Plant Vs. the Presiding Officer, Labour ...
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Apr-01-2002
Reported in: 2002(50)BLJR1307; [2002(95)FLR97]; (2002)IIILLJ245Jhar
ORDERTapen Sen, J.1. Heard Mr. Rajiv Ranjan, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr. S.B. Gadodia, Senior Advocate, appearing for the respondent No. 2 and with their consent this writ petition is being disposed off at this stage.2. The writ petitioner has prayed for quashing the award dated 15.3.2001, passed by the Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Bokaro Steel City in Reference Case No. 06/95, whereby and whereunder he has held that there is a relationship of employer and employee between the Management of Bokaro Steel Plant and the concerned workman. He has also held that the action of the Management in not regularising the services of the said concerned workman is improper and unjustified and that he is entitled to regularisation of his services together with all benefits and consequently, a prayer has been made for issuance of a direction upon the Management to implement the Award within a period of two months from the date of pronouncement.3. According to the Managemen...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- Next ›