Skip to content

Jharkhand Court March 2002 Judgments

Browse smarter

Open an 18-section brief on any judgment

Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.

  • AI Brief & Ask
  • Semantic AI Search
  • Devil's Bench

Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.

Mar 05 2002

Satyanarayan Roy Vs. the State of Jharkhand and ors.

Court: Jharkhand

Decided on: Mar-05-2002

Reported in: 2002(2)BLJR1252

Tapen Sen, J.1. By order dated 30.1.2002, as contained at Annexure 5 to the writ petition the Regional Director, Animal Husbandry, while recording that one Dr. Kedar Prasad Pandey was going to superannuate on 31.1.2002, directed that the petitioner, who was the senior-most officer and was functioning as Sub-Divisional Animal Husbandry Officer, Latehar, would function as District Animal Husbandry Officer in addition to his own duties till further orders. Subsequently, however, by order dated 31.1.2002, the Secretary to the Department of Animal Husbandry and Fisheries, passed a contrary order and directed the said superannuating officer to hand over the charge to the Respondent No. 5 (Kaiadhar Prasad) instead to the petitioner.2. The grievance of the petitioner is that he being the senior to the Respondent No. 5 and his seniority having already been recorded vide Annexure 5, should not have been ignored and officers who are retiring/superannuating should, therefore, have been directed to...


Mar 05 2002

Bhudeo Yadav Vs. State of Jharkhand and anr.

Court: Jharkhand

Decided on: Mar-05-2002

Reported in: II(2002)DMC257

Deoki Nandan Prasad, J.1. Heard Counsels for the parties.2. This is an application under Sections 397 and 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (hereinafter to be referred to as 'the Code') against the order dated 3.7.2001 passed by the Sessions Judge, Deoghar, in Sessions Case No. 237 of 2000, whereby and whereunder, the learned Sessions Judge rejected the petition dated 30.1.2001 filed by the prosecution under Section 319 of the Code for summoning the accused-opposite party No. 2 (Rina Devi, sister-in-law of the deceased) to face the trial.3. The learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submitted at the very outset that P.Ws. 1 and 2 who were examined during the trial have specifically stated the name of opposite party No. 2 (Rina Devi) for torturing the deceased as indicated in paragraphs 3 and 2 respectively of their deposition. It is also submitted that the learned Court below committed error in rejecting the petition under Section 319 of the Code only on mere conjunc...


Mar 03 2002

A.K. Sen Gupta @ Alok Kumar Sen Gupta Vs. the State of Jharkhand

Court: Jharkhand

Decided on: Mar-03-2002

Reported in: 2002CriLJ2272

ORDERVikramaditya Prasad, J. 1. This application under Section 482, Cr PC has been filed for quashing the FIR of Jharia (Tisra) P.S. Case No. 49/2001 pending in the Court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Dhanbad, and all the proceedings therein, besides any order that the Court deems fit and proper.2. On 2.2.2001, the Officer-in-charge, Lodna Out-post, received and information that water-logging in Seam No. 7 of Bagdig Colliery started taking place and the officers and workmen were trapped inside the Mine. He registered a Sanha No. 28 dated 2.2.2001 and he along with the Sub-Inspector and policeman went to the colliery. There he heard from the assembled angry persons that the Officers have put the lives of workmen in danger. There were fractional activities for the rescue work. He also came to know that in the Bagdigi Colliery No. 7 Seam had broken and water was entering in the Mine very fast and barring 30-35 persons rest of the persons came out of the Mine safely. After sometime, Halim ...


  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial