Jharkhand Court August 2001 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Uphar Picture Palace Vs. Presiding Officer, Labour Court and ors.
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-08-2001
Reported in: [2002(95)FLR101]
ORDERS.M. Mukhopadhaya, J.1. This application has been preferred by petitioner, M/s. Uphar picture Palace against the order dated 6.8.1999 passed by learned Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Ranchi, in B.S. Case No. 11/97. The application under Section 26(2) of the Bihar Shops and Establishment Act filed by the respondent, Shankar Karmakar against the order of dismissal was allowed and he was reinstated with full back wages/compensation.2. The brief fact of the case is that M/s. Uphar Picture Palace is carrying on business of exhibition of cinema shows, a place of public entertainment. It engaged several persons including respondent, Shankar Karmakar who was working since 1975 as operator. A departmental proceeding was initiated against him by charge-sheet dated 28.5.1996 whereinafter the respondent, Shankar Karmakar was dismissed vide order dated 8.5.1997.3. The respondent, Shankar Karmakar filed a complaint petition under Section 26(2) of the Bihar Shops and Establishment Act register...
Chancellor, Universities of Jharkhand Through His Principal Secretary, ...
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-07-2001
Reported in: 2002(50)BLJR1919; [2001(91)FLR343]
ORDER1. In this appeal under clause 10 of the Letters Patent, the judgment of the learned single Judge of this Court passed on 10th July, 2001, in WP (S) No. 2365 of 2001 (reported in 2001 (3) JCR 39 (Jhr)) is under challenge.2. By this judgment, the learned single Judge has quashed and set-aside the notification, dated 12th June, 2000, issued by the Chancellor, Ranchi University, whereby he suspended the respondent; from the postof the Vice-Chancellor, Ranchi University with effect from 5th June, 2000. The learned single Judge in the operative part of the judgment under appeal has accordingly held and directed that the order of suspension stands revoked with immediate effect and that, therefore, the respondent would stand reinstated on the post of Vice-Chancellor, Ranchi University. We are informed at the Bar that in compliance with and on implementation of the said order of the learned Single Judge, the respondent actually resumed the charge of the office of the Vice-Chancellor, Ranc...
Arvind Vijay Bilung with V.N. Mishra Vs. State of Bihar and ors.
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-07-2001
Reported in: 2002(50)BLJR336
ORDERS.J. Mukhopadhaya, J.1. Since the issue involved in both the writ petitions are of vital public importance, in as much as these relate to the status of every person, who immediately before reorganisation was serving in connection of the existing State, of Bihar and the powers of the successor-State of Bihar and Jharkhand, they were heard together and are being disposed of by this common judgment and order.2. The petitioner, Arvind Vijay Bilung of CWJC No. 2202/2001, a member of State. Education Service, was posted at Jehanabad (now in the present State of Bihar) between 1996-98. Since October 16th, 1998, he was posted as District Superintendent of Education, Chatra (now in the State of Jharkhand).3. The other petitioner, V.N. Mishra of WP (S) No. 2692/2001, a member of State Forest Service, was posted as Divisional Forest Officer, State Trading Division, Gumla (now in the State of Jharkhand). Subsequently, he was posted as Divisional Forest Officer, Minor Forest Material Project D...
Madhu Rajwar and ors. Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors.
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-07-2001
Reported in: 2002(50)BLJR60
M.Y. Eqbal, J.1. These two writ applications, arising out of common order, have been heard together and disposed of by this order.2. The petitioners have challenged the order dated 14.11.2000 passed by the Collector, Dhanbad in exercise of power conferred upon him under Section 6A of the Essential Commodities Act, whereby and whereunder the Collector confiscated 48 quintals of sugar belonging to the petitioners of CWJC 4129/ 2000 and a public carrier vehicle belonging to the petitioner of CWJC 4130/2000 for violation of the provisions of Bihar Trade Articles (Licences Unification) Order, 1984 (in short the 'Unification Order').3. The facts are not in much dispute. On 26.3.2000 Sub-Inspector of Police intercepted a public carrier truck carrying 48 bags of sugar from Katras to Nichitpur at Katras chowk and carried the truck to the police station.4. The allegation is that on demand the driver of the truck failed to produce any document/paper in relation to the stock of sugar loaded in the...
Jageshwar Mahto and ors. Vs. State of Bihar
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-01-2001
Reported in: 2001CriLJ4589; I(2002)DMC152
Deoki Nandan Prasad, J.1. This criminal appeal is directed against the judgment and order of conviction and sentence dated 14.1.2000/17.1.2000 passed by Shri Awadh Kishore Singh Chauhan, 1st Additional Session Judge, Hazaribagh in Sessions Trial No. 299/1995, whereby and hereunder the learned Sessions Judge convicted the appellants under Sections 304B and 201 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced them to undergo R.I. for 10 years under Section 304B, I.P.C. and one year R.I. under Section 201, I.P.C. each. However, both sentences ordered to run concurrently.2. The case of the prosecution in brief is that Chinta Devi deceased was married with the appellant No. 3, Raj Kumar Mahto on 5.5.1992 and since after the marriage accused persons/appellants started demanding Rajdoot motorcycle and a golden Chain weighing two tolas and due to non-fulfilment of the demands, Chinta Devi was subjected to torture. It is further alleged that Chinta Devi whenever came to her Naihar she stated about the sa...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- Next ›