Jharkhand Court July 2001 Judgments
Sunil Kumar Sinha and anr. Vs. State of Bihar and ors.
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-04-2001
Reported in: 2002(50)BLJR307
ORDERM.Y. Eqbal, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.2. This writ application is directed against the orders passed by the authorities under Chhotanagpur Tenancy Act, whereby an order for restoration of the land in question has been passed in favour of the concerned respondent, who is a member of Scheduled Tribe.3. This is one of the glaring example as to how the members of the Scheduled Tribe are deprived of from their land by fraudulent method. Admittedly, the land belongs to the raiyat Mangra Oraon. The story made out by the petitioners and their predecessor in interest is that in 1967 Mangra Oraon relinquished the disputed land. There is no document of relinquishment. Relinquishment is also a transfer which is hit by Section 46 of the CNT Act for want of permission from the Deputy Commissioner and also hit by Section 17 of the Registration Act for want of registration. Therefore, the first transaction by wayof relinquishment is illegal. Immediately, thereafter in order to g...
Tag this Judgment!Dilip Kumar Mahto Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors.
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-04-2001
Reported in: [2003(4)JCR174(Jhr)]
ORDER1. Heard both sides.2. The vehicle belonging to the petitioner was seized on the allegation that it was involved in the forest offence of transportation of illicit timber. The petitioner pleaded that he was not aware of the fact that the vehicle was being used for illegal transportation of the forest produce. The Divisional Forest Officer found on an enquiry, that in addition, to the driver, a relative of the owner was also present in the vehicle at the time of transportation of the forest produce and at the time of seizure. The Divisional Forest Officer, rejecting the case of the owner that he was not aware of the illicit transport of timber, held that a forest offence has been committed and passed an order for confiscation. The petitioner filed an appeal before the appellate authority. Apparently the only aspect urged before the appellate authority was that the value of the timber that was transported illegally was meager compared with the value of the vehicle, the confiscation ...
Tag this Judgment!Anil Oraon Vs. State of Bihar and ors.
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-03-2001
Reported in: [2002(92)FLR238]
M.Y. Eqbal, J.1. Heard learned counsel for the parties on the amendment petition and for the reason stated therein, same is allowed.2. In this writ application the petitioner has prayed for issuance of writ directing the respondents to appointment the petitioner on compassionate ground in place of his father, late Gyani Oraon, a Bench Clerk of the Civil Court, Ranchi.3. The petitioner's father late Gyani Oraon while working as ex-Bench clerk in the Court of Judicial Magistrate Ranchi, died all of a sudden on 27.7.1998 during his service period leaving behind a widow, 4 sons and one unmarried daughter. After the death of Gyani Oraon, the petitioner being the eldest son, applied for his appointment on compassionate ground in Class III post, as he has already completed his graduation in 1997. The appointment committee, headed by the Judicial Magistrate, Ranchi. considered the case of the petitioner and took a decision on 11.5.2000 that the petitioner was not fit for appointment in Class I...
Tag this Judgment!- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- Next ›