Jharkhand Ranchi Court April 2011 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Shambhu Thakur. Vs. the State of Jharkhand and anr.
Court: Jharkhand Ranchi
Decided on: Apr-05-2011
1. The petitioner has invoked the inherent jurisdiction of this Court under Section 482 Code of Criminal Procedure for the quashment of the entire criminal proceeding against him as well as the order dated 07.07.2008 by which cognizance of the offence was taken under Sections 379/323 of the Indian Penal Code in Chandankiyari (Bhojudih O.P.) P.S. Case No. 53 of 2003, corresponding to G.R. Case No. 520 of 2003.2. Mr. S. Thakur, learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner raised short question of law involved in this case that initially a case was instituted under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code against the petitioner on the written report of the informant O.P.No.2- Thanda Devya alleging that the petitioner after entering into her house at about 3 a.m. assaulted her by strangulating and took away Rs. 2,000/- ( Rupees two thousand) from her possession forcibly and also assaulted on her different parts of body. The case was instituted on 23.06.2003 but the police after investigation s...
Anisur Rahman and anr. Vs.
Court: Jharkhand Ranchi
Decided on: Apr-04-2011
1. The present writ petition has been preferred against the order passed by learned Additional Judicial Commissioner XVII, Ranchi dated 17th May, 2010 in Title Appeal No. 44 of 2006, whereby, an application preferred by the present petitioners has been rejected and the order passed by the trial court for deposition of the rent amount is maintained by the lower appellate court, even at the stage of the appeal.2. Having heard learned counsel for the petitioners and looking to the facts and circumstances of the case, I see no reason to entertain this writ petition mainly for the following facts and reasons:(i) The present petitioners are original plaintiffs, who have instituted Title (Eviction) Suit No. 7 of 1987 mainly on the ground that lease period has already expired and secondly for eviction of respondent no. 1 from the suit premises on the ground of personal need.(ii) It appears from the facts of the case that an application under Section 15 of the Bihar Building (Lease, Rent and Ev...
Mrinal Kanti Chakraborty. Vs. the State of Jharkhand.
Court: Jharkhand Ranchi
Decided on: Apr-01-2011
1. The petitioner has invoked the inherent jurisdiction of this Court under Section 482 Code of Criminal Procedure for the quashment of the order dated 19.12.2006 passed by the Special Judge, C.B.I.-cum-Additional Sessions Judge, VIIIth, Dhanbad in R.C. Case No.11(A)/2004(D) by which cognizance of the offence was taken against the petitioner under Sections 120B/420/467/468/471 of the Indian Penal Code and under Section 13(2) r/w Section 13 (1) (d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.2. The prosecution story in short was that the informant reliably learnt to the effect that Shri S.K. Chauliya, Scientist-C of Central Mining Research Institute (C.M.R.I.), Dhanbad, D.C. Goswami, Store and Purchase Officer (C.M.R.I.), Dhanbad entered into conspiracy with M/s Allied Technology, 5/15, WEA, Karolbag, New Delhi and others unknown and in pursuance of the said criminal conspiracy and by using their official position, purchased soil and irrigation kit at exhorbitant price causing wrongful lo...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- Next ›