Jammu and Kashmir Court October 2014 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
1 Satpal Singh. Vs. State and Others
Court: Jammu and Kashmir
Decided on: Oct-21-2014
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR AT JAMMU Cr Appeal No. 16 OF2012AND Cr. Appeal No. 17 OF20121 Satpal Singh. 2 Sewak Singh Petitioners State and others Respondent !Mr.Sunil Sethi, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Ravi Abrol, Mr. Mohsin Bhat & Mr. Aijaz Mehrab, Advocates ^Mr. Gagan Basotra, Sr. AAG & Mr. Monish Chopra, GA for State. Mr. L.K.Sharma, Advocate for the complainant Honble Mr. Justice Virender Singh-Judge Honble Mr. Justice Bansi Lal Bhat-Judge Date:21. 10.2014 :JUDGMENT : Cr. Appeal No.16/2012 & Cr.M.A. No.17/2012; Cr. Appeal No.17/2012 & Cr.M.A. Nos.18/2012 & 97/2012; c/w Confirm Ref. No. 09/2012 Whether approved for reporting in Law Journal/Digest? Yes/No Whether approved for reporting in Media/Newspaper? Yes/No Per Bansi Lal Bhat J.1. These two appeals arise out of a common judgment of conviction dated 02.02.2012 recorded by learned 2nd Additional Sessions Judge, Jammu on File No.74 Sessions titled State Vs. Sewak Singh and ors. by virtue whereof appellants Satpa...
Rakesh Manhas Vs. Aruna Manhas
Court: Jammu and Kashmir
Decided on: Oct-21-2014
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR AT JAMMU561A CrPC No. 35 OF2014Rakesh Manhas Petitioners Aruna Manhas Respondent !Mr. B. B. Kotwal, Advocate ^M/s V. S. Saini and I. H. Shah, Advocates Honble Mr. Justice Janak Raj Kotwal, Judge Date:21. 10.2014 :JUDGMENT :1. This petition seeks invoking of inherent jurisdiction of this Court under section 561-A Cr.P.C. to quash a complaint(application) under section 12(1) of the Jammu and Kashmir Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2010 (for short the Act) filed against the petitioners by the respondent as also the order dated 27.01.2014 passed by the trial Magistrate.2. Heard. I have perused the record.3. Petitioner No. 1 and the respondent are husband and wife, their marriage was solemnized on 18.09.2012. Petitioners 2 and 3 are the parents of petitioner No. 1 and petitioner No. 4 is his sister. Petitioner No. 5 is the husband of petitioner No.4. 2 4. In her application under section 12(1) of the Act filed before learned Special Excise Mag...
Rajeev Singh Kotwal and ors a/W Connected Matters Vs. State and ors
Court: Jammu and Kashmir
Decided on: Oct-14-2014
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR AT JAMMU SWP No. 2729 OF2014AND SWP No. 1760 OF2014AND SWP No. 1211 OF014Rajeev Singh Kotwal and ors a/w connected matters Petitioners State and ors Respondent !Mr. M. K. Bhardwaj, Sr. Advocate, Mr. R. K. Jain, Advocate,Mr. M. A. Bhat, Advocate, Mr. N. D. Qazi, Advocate Mr. M. I. Sherkhan, Adv., Ms. Mumtaz Choudhary, Adv. Mr. Rahul Pant, Advocate and Mr. F. A. Natnoo, Advocate ^Mr. H.A. Siddiqui, AAG, Mr. Arun Kumar, Advocate Mr. Nitin Bhasin, Advocate & Mr. Rajesh Bhushan Honble Mr. Justice Janak Raj Kotwal-Judge Date:14. 10.2014 :JUDGMENT : SWP No. 2729/2014, CMA No. 4015/2013 c/w SWP No. 1760/2014 SWP No. 1211/2014, SWP No. 498/2014 SWP No. 174/2014, SWP No. 14/2014 SWP No. 2846/2013 & COA(S) No. 80/2014 1. In the year, 2007, State Government engaged all the unemployed Agriculture Graduates in the State as Rehbar-e-Zirat (for short ReZs). The Government has now formulated a policy for their regularization as Village Agriculture Extension Assis...
Gagan Deep Singh and anr. Vs. Spl. Public Prosecutor Jammu
Court: Jammu and Kashmir
Decided on: Oct-01-2014
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR AT JAMMU Cr Rev No. 02 OF2014Gagan Deep Singh & anr. Petitioners Spl. Public Prosecutor Jammu Respondent !Mr. Anmol Sharma, Advocate ^Mr. Gagan Basotra, Sr. AAG Honble Mr. Justice Janak Raj Kotwal-Judge Date:01. 10.2014 :JUDGMENT :1. Short question raised in this revision petition is; whether petitioners, who are facing trial for offence under section 302/34 RPC, are entitled to benefit under the Jammu and Kashmir Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2013 (for short, the Act of 2013) and to be released on bail 2. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and have gone through the impugned order dated 21.12.2013, whereby learned trial court has dismissed petitioners bail application taking the view that the Act of 2013 is not attracted.3. Alleged offence has been committed on 11.06.2010. Petitioners are alleged to have committed murder. After holding inquiry on an application moved by the petitioners, learned trial court has foun...
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›