Jammu and Kashmir Court July 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Chaitanya Prabhu Vs. Adarsh Kumar
Court: Jammu and Kashmir
Decided on: Jul-19-2013
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR AT JAMMU. C Rev No. 19 OF 201.Chaitanya Prabhu Petitioners Adarsh Kumar Respondent !Mr. Sunil Sethi, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Rohit Kohli, Advocate ^Mr.P.N.Raina, Sr.Advocate with Mr. J.A.Hamal, Advocate. Mr.P.S.Parmar, Advocate Honble Mr. Justice Bansi Lal Bhat, Judge Date:19. 07.2013 : :1. This revision petition is directed against the order dated 15.12.2012 passed by learned Sub Judge, Reasi in File No.1/Execution titled Adarsh Kumar Vs. Chetanya Prabhu, the order dated 22.02.2013 passed by learned District Judge, Reasi in Appeal No.13/Appeal titled Chetanya Prabhu Vs. Adarsh Kumar, and the order dated 05.11.2012 passed by learned Sub Judge, Reasi in File No.8/Civil Miscellaneous titled Adarsh 2 Kumar Vs. Chaitanya Prabhu. The factual matrix attending upon this revision petition may briefly be summarised as under:- 2. Respondent, a tenant of petitioner for about four decades, was running business of photography styled as M/S Sansar Studio in the shop whi...
Oriental Insurance Company Limited Vs. Gulnaz Begum and ors
Court: Jammu and Kashmir
Decided on: Jul-19-2013
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR AT JAMMU. CIMA No. 346 OF 201.Oriental Insurance Company Limited Petitioners Gulnaz Begum and ors Respondent !Mr.D.S.Chouhan, Advocate ^Mr. R.Koul, Advocate Honble Mr. Justice Bansi Lal Bhat, Judge Date:19. 07.2013 : :1. This Civil Ist Miscellaneous Appeal is directed against the award dated 31st May, 2012 passed by learned Presiding Officer, Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Kishtwar in File No.101/Claim titled Gulnaz Begum and ors. Vs. Oriental Insurance Company Limited and ors in terms whereof the Tribunal has awarded total compensation of Rs.9,51,600/- (Rupees Nine Lacs Fifty One Thousand and six hundred only) in favour of petitioners on account of death of Khair Mohammad. The award has been assailed on the ground that the Tribunal has drawn 2 erroneous conclusions and the findings are perverse; that the facts and law have not been appreciated in the right perspective; that in absence of proof of definite income of deceased, fixing of his monthly incom...
Sanjeev Chowdhary Vs. Inderjeet Kapoor and anr
Court: Jammu and Kashmir
Decided on: Jul-19-2013
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR AT JAMMU. 561_A No. 36 OF 201.AND CrMA No. 36 OF 201.Sanjeev Chowdhary Petitioners Inderjeet Kapoor and anr Respondent !Mr.Y.E.Tak, Advocate ^None Honble Mr. Justice Bansi Lal Bhat, Judge Date:19. 07.2013 : :1. Through the medium of instant petition under Section 561-A CrPC, petitioner calls in question legality and correctness of the order dated 01.02.2011 passed by learned Sessions Judge, Jammu in a revision petition titled Inderjeet Kapoor Vs Sanjeev Choudhary. To understand the controversy, it is apt to refer to the factual matrix in brief.2. The shop, which is the subject matter, was given on rent by respondent no.1 to petitioner in 1997. Petitioner was running the business of 2 readymade garments under the name and style of M/S Bomb Shell in that shop. As the business of petitioner flourished and he required more space, he obtained the adjoining shop, also belonging to respondent no.1, on rent. No formal rent deeds were executed. Petitioner renovat...
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›