Jammu and Kashmir Court December 2011 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Medisphere Marketing Ltd. Vs. All J and K Hospital and Institutional C ...
Court: Jammu and Kashmir
Decided on: Dec-17-2011
HASNAIN MASSODI,J. Caveat No.6/5/2011 1. Discharged. PERLP No. 13/2011 2. Having regard to the grounds urged and on no opposition from the other side, applicant is permitted to file Letter Patent Appeal against the Writ Court Order dated 19-5-2011 passed in OWP No.227/2011. 3. Disposed of. LPA (W) No.137/2011, CMP No.1/2011 4. On consideration, the Letters Patent Appeal is admitted and at request taken up for final disposal at the initial stage. 5. The Chairman, “Committee for finalizing Technical Specifications of Critical Ambulances-(hereinafter “Committee”) respondent-5 herein, on 3-5-2010 floated a tender notice inviting offers from the original manufacturers of Critical Care Ambulances for supply of Critical Care Ambulance to the Health Department of the State Government. The tender notice gave all necessary details including the mode and manner in which the technical bid and financial bid, was to be submitted. The State Government Order No.185-HME of 2010 dated ...
Ghulam Mohammad Bhat Vs. Abdul Rahim Sheikh and Others
Court: Jammu and Kashmir
Decided on: Dec-17-2011
Respondents No.1 to 3 are the sons and respondent No.4 is the daughter of one Ghulam Ahmad Sheikh. The said deceased Ghulam Ahmad Sheikh has left behind property including the land covered by survey No.306/51 Khewat No.65 situated at Parimpora Srinagar. Respondents No.2 to 4 out of said survey number have sold land measuring 1 kanal 19 marlas 111 sqft. to the petitioner through registered sale deed executed on 6.10.2004. The respondent No.1 claimed to have first right to purchase, so filed suit for right of prior purchase which has been decided by the Court of Additional District Judge, Srinagar on 23.2.2008 in ex-parte because the petitioner and respondents No.2 to 4 despite proper service had first failed to appear but then Mr. N. A. Kuchay Advocate had appeared but then again remained absent. Noticing the same position, trial court has recorded that there was no option but to proceed in ex-parte. The trial culminated in decreeing the suit in ex-parte in favour of the respondent No.1...
Mst. Shameema Begum Vs. Mst. Zoona and Others
Court: Jammu and Kashmir
Decided on: Dec-12-2011
1. Civil Second Appeal is directed against the judgment and decree dated 20th of April, 2011 passed by District Judge, Kupwara. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the respondents questioned the maintainability of the appeal in view of the bar contained in sub-section 3 of Section 37 of the JandK Arbitration and Conciliation Act (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’). 3. Background of the case has to be noticed for appreciating the matter in its right perspective: (i) One Habibullah Khan had three wives, namely, Mst. Shaha (deceased), Mst. Lal Begum (deceased) and Mst. Hajira begum. From the Wedlock of Mst. Shaha one daughter, namely, Zoona Begum (R-1) is surviving. From the wedlock of Lal Begum (deceased) two issues i.e. Liyaqat Ali Khan (son) and Afsara (daughter)(R-2) are surviving whereas from the wedlock of Mst. Hajira seven daughters, namely, Shameema Begum (appellant), Naseema (R-3), Nazmeen Begum (R-4), Shafeeqa, Lateefa (R-5), Mehmooda (R-6), Rasheeda (R-7) and ...
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›