Jammu and Kashmir Court April 2003 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Bashir Ahmad Bawan Vs. State and ors.
Court: Jammu and Kashmir
Decided on: Apr-09-2003
Reported in: 2003(3)JKJ23
Nargotra, J.1. By this letters patent appeal the legality of order dated 16th of January 2003 passed by Ld. single Judge, whereby interim relief sought by the writ petitioners/appellants has been refused, is being questioned.2. The dispute in the instant case is to the seniority of Assistant Engineers between direct recruits and promotees. SRO 380 dated 6th of July 1978 provided for the appointment of Assistant Engineers from three sources in the ratio 20% direct, 60% by promotion from the degree holder Junior Engineers and 20% by promotion from diploma holder Junior Engineers. The private respondents applied for appointment in direct recruitment quota in pursuance of the advertisement issued by Public Service Commission some where in 1980. They were interviewed and were kept in waiting list whereas about 11 candidates came to be appointed direction till 1986, whereafter Government promoted 85 Junior Engineers and 24 Sectional Officers. Private respondents filed three writ petitions SW...
Gulzar Ahmed Alai Vs. State of J and K and ors.
Court: Jammu and Kashmir
Decided on: Apr-08-2003
Reported in: 2003(3)JKJ628
Syed Bashir-Ud-Din, J.1. Subject, Gulzar Ahmad Alai, has been detained by District Magistrate Anantnag, under Section 8 of the Jammu and Kashmir Public Safety Act 1978 with a view to prevent him from acting in any manner prejudicial to the security of the State under his Order No: F-198/DMA/PSA/DET/2001/301-306 dated 11.09.2001. In this petition challenge is thrown to the legality of this order and the consequent detention. Respondents have filed counter affidavit. The detention file is also made available on record.2. The Ld. Counsel for the petitioner submits that the detenue is prejudiced, in as mush as he has not been supplied with the report/dossier/documents referred in grounds and subject of satisfaction of the detaining authority while arriving at a decision culminating in detention of the subject. The detenue was deprived of an opportunity to make representation against the detention to the Government by the above conduct of the respondents. The counsel further submits that th...
Reyaz Ahmed Bhat Vs. State of J and K
Court: Jammu and Kashmir
Decided on: Apr-08-2003
Reported in: 2003(3)JKJ544
Syed Bashir-Ud-Din, J.1. Subject Reyaz Ahmad Bhat is detained by District Magistrate Anantnag under Section 8 of the J&K; Public Safety Act, 1978 with a view to prevent him from acting in any manner prejudicial to the security of the State under his Order F-197/DMA/PSA/DET/2001/253-580, dated 11.9.2001. This order and the consequent detention is under challenge in this petition. The respondents through the detaining authority District Magistrate , Anantnag has filed counter. The detention file is also available on record file.2. The counsel for the petitioner submits that the detention order as also the grounds have not been supplied to the detenue. No material/documents, subject of detention is supplied to detenue. Though, the detention is based on report and documents supplied to detaining authority by the District Police, yet the documents from which the detaining authority has drawn satisfaction are not supplied to detenue and thereby the detention order as also the grounds are not...
New India Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Wahida Ali and ors. and Javeed Ahmad ...
Court: Jammu and Kashmir
Decided on: Apr-07-2003
Reported in: 2003(2)JKJ713
B.L. Bhat, J. 1. Two claim petitions titled as Wahida Ali and Anr. v. Raghubir Singh and Ors. and Javeed Ahmed v. Raghubir Singh and Ors. came to be filed before the learned Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Jammu (herein referred to as the Tribunal below) where they came to be registered as Claim Petition Nos. 272 and 271 both of 21.5.2001. These claim petitions are alleged to have taken place with respect to the one and the same accident which took place on 22.6.95 at Garote Morhe, National High Way when one Mubarak Ali Shah S/o Hayat Ali Shah along with one Javeed Ahmad Bhat S/o Gh. Mohd. Bhat resident of No. 98 Phase III Industrial Area Gangyal Jammu while coming towards Jammu City from Lakhanpur. On his personal vehicle bearing registration No. 786 JK02B was hit by a rashly driven truck bearing Ch. No. 01-1/5305 driven by respondent No. 2 from opposite direction, as a result of which Mubarak Ali Shah and Javid Ahmad Bhat sustained injuries and were removed to hospital, where Mubarak...
Satnam Singh Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.
Court: Jammu and Kashmir
Decided on: Apr-07-2003
Reported in: 2003(2)JKJ791
V.K. Jhanji, A.C.J.1. In this writ petition, the relief sought for by the writ petitioner is that tender Notice No. S&C;/32(3)/J&K; STG/2003-04 be quashed.2. In brief the facts are that Food Corporation of India, Jammu invited tenders for transportation of FCI stocks to various Centres within the State of Jammu and Kashmir. According to the petitioner his firm is dealing in transportation business in the State and was also keen to submit tender, but has not been able to do because of the clauses 4 & 5 of he tender notice whereby the earnest money to the tune of Rupees 1.19 Crores in the shape of Demand Draft has been demanded at the time of submission of tender and the successful tenderer is required to furnish a Security Deposit of Rupees 4.15 Crores.3. Clauses 4 & 5 read as under:-'4. Earnest Money: -- Each tender must be accompanied by an Earnest Money of Rs. 1.19 Crore (Rupees one Crore nineteen lacs) in the form of a Demand Draft issued by the State Bank of India or a Scheduled Ba...
New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Wahid Ali and ors.
Court: Jammu and Kashmir
Decided on: Apr-07-2003
Reported in: III(2004)ACC186
B.L. Bhat, J.1. Two claim petitions titled as Wahida Ali and Anr. v. Raghubir Singh and Ors. and Javeed Ahmad v. Raghubir Singh and Ors. came to be filed before the learned Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Jammu (herein referred to as the Tribunal below) where they came to be registered as Claim Petition Nos. 272 and 271 both of 1st May, 2001. These claim petitions are alleged to have taken place with respect to the one and the same Accident which took place on 22nd June, 1995 at Garote Morhe, National High Way when one Mubarak Ali Shah s/o. Hayat Ali Shah along with one Javeed Ahmad Bhat s/o. Gh. Mohd. Bhat resident of No. 98 Phase III, Industrial Area Gangyal, Jammu while coming towards Jammu City from Lakhanpur on his personal vehicle bearing registration No. 786 (sic) was hit by a rashly driven truck bearing Ch. No. 01-1/5305 driven by respondent No. 2 from opposite direction, as a result of which Mubarak Ali Shah and Javeed Ahmad Bhat sustained injuries and were removed to hospital...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- Next ›