Jammu and Kashmir Court October 2001 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
State Vs. S. Sheetal Singh
Court: Jammu and Kashmir
Decided on: Oct-19-2001
Reported in: 2002CriLJ2394
ORDERB.L. Bhat, J.1. This revision petition which is directed against the order of learned Ses-fions Judge, Srinagar recorded on 9-10-1996 in a case titled as 'State v. S. Sheetal Singh' whereby he came to discharge the accused, stems out of the following circumstances.2. On 8-10-1994 Dr. inderjeet Singh came to lodge a written report before S.H.O. Kothibagh Srinagar alleging therein that on 8-10-1994 at 12-30 p.m. he was getting his car washed outside Maghaldarbar, suddenly Mr. Sheetal Singh an ex-army officer got down from his Jypsy; security vehicle along with four gunmen started beating him and pulled off his hair and beard and also asked one of the gunmen to hand-oner the rifle so that he will shoot him. Said Sheetal Singh also directed the said gunmen to note the number of his vehicle so that he can get him eliminated. Several people assembled on spot as a result of which said Sheetal Singh managed his escape by the said Jypsy. He has further alleged that few days back, the accus...
Parveen Kumar Gupta Vs. State of Jammu and Kashmir and anr.
Court: Jammu and Kashmir
Decided on: Oct-06-2001
Reported in: AIR2002J& K123
ORDERS. K. Gupta, J.1. Admitted.2. Notice dated 20-12-1998 calling upon the appellant to demolish the unauthorised construction raised by him within seven days from the date of receipt of the notice was challenged before Jammu and Kashmir Special Tribunal, Jammu. It was pleaded that the appellant had repaired his own old house located in Vinayak Bazar, after securing requisite permission from Jammu Municipality (respondent 3). It was further pleaded that the appellant has not committed breach of any provisions contained in the Jammu and Kashmir Municipal Act and, therefore, the notice calling upon him to remove the unauthorised construction was uncalled for. It was further pleaded that the lane is almost covered with balconies constructed by the inhabitants and as such sought compounding of the case and setting aside of the impugned order.3. The Tribunal, in order to ascertain the factual position existing on spot, visited the place and found that there were number of rooms without any...
Skuast and anr. Vs. Anil Pathania and ors.
Court: Jammu and Kashmir
Decided on: Oct-06-2001
Reported in: AIR2002J& K78
N.A. Kakru, J.1. Two letters patent appeals arise out of an Interim order of the Learned single Judge dated 13-9-2001 which has the effect of granting admission to respondent No. 1 (writ petitioner hereinafter) to the course of BV. Sc. and Animal Husbandary Programme. LPA 150/2001 is filed by Sher-i-Kashmir University of Agricultural Science and Technology (for short SKUAST) and LPA No. 149/2001 is filed by a candidate 'who claims entitlement to the seat.2. The question which calls for consideration is whether a candidate can be considered for admission to the course under the sports category without a certificate being enclosed with the application form. When the LPAs came up for consideration, LC for the parties agreed to the disposal of the writ petition as well so that air of uncertainly no more hangs over the career of the candidates. On such consensus, LC for the parties were but after concluding the arguments Mr. Raina appearing for the writ petitioner chose to withdraw the cons...
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›