Jammu and Kashmir Court April 1997 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Mohammad Ramzan Sofi Vs. Krishen Lal
Court: Jammu and Kashmir
Decided on: Apr-23-1997
Reported in: AIR1997J& K121
ORDERM.Y. Kawoosa, J.1. This civil revision petition is directed against the impugned order passed by learned District Judge, Srinagar on 3-3-1997 in a miscellaneous transfer petition captioned Krishen Lal Isher v. Mohammad Ramzan Sofi and others. The learned Judge . has passed the order which reads as under:'......I would not like to hear this transferapplication and the same is accordingly transferred to the Court of Additional District Judge, Srinagar, for disposal under law. Counsel for the parties are directed to appear before the transferee Court on 8-3-1997......'2. Petitioner in the present revision petition has stated that he has filed a civil suit for ejectment which is pending in the Court of Sub-Judge (Judge Small Causes Court, Srinagar) respondent-K. L. Isher, who is defendant in the case had also filed a suitfor injunction before the Court of 1st Addl. Munsiff, Srinagar. Respondent has come up with an application for transfer before the Court of District Judge, Srinagar s...
Haji Ghulam Mohammad Vs. State Bank of India, Branch Srinagar
Court: Jammu and Kashmir
Decided on: Apr-03-1997
Reported in: AIR1997J& K107
M.Y. Kawoosa, J. 1. This Civil Revision pertains to the year 1985. Counsel for the petitioner has all along remained present, but the counsel for the other side is not present. Mr. P. N. Goja, was appearing for the respondent. He is stated to have left the valley, but the notice was issued to the parties. Representative of the Respondent-Bank was present in person on 12-12-1987 before the Registry of this Court, thereafter the respondent did not appear however on 28-1-1988 Mr. R. A. Jan, has appeared for Mr. P. N. Goja and had sought an adjournment. However, nobody is present on his behalf today. This revision is against the order of learned Sub-Judge, (Chief Judicial Magistrate, Srinagar) dated 19th of December, 1984. Simple point involved is that in the money suit in which the present petitioner was defendant, plaintiff bank which is the respondent herein whileexamining its witness Rajaji has produced the document through the aforementioned witness during the course of his statement ...
Harnam Singh and Etc. Vs. State of Jammu and Kashmir
Court: Jammu and Kashmir
Decided on: Apr-03-1997
Reported in: 1998CriLJ1804
ORDERG.D. Sharma, J.1. These revision petitions have arisen out of order dated 31 -7-91 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Jammu (in Appeal No. 15/88) whereby he altered the conviction and sentence of petitioner Harnam Singh for the commission of offence Under Section 222 to offence Under Section 223, RPC. Rigorous imprisonment awarded for two years and a fine of Rs. 500/- under Section 222, RPC was reduced to simple imprisonment for one year and fine of Rs. 200/- under Section 223, RPC. The conviction and sentence awarded to the petitioner Avtar Singh under Section 224, RPC was confirmed. The learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jammu had held the trial and vide his judgment and order dated 17-12-88 convicted and sentenced the petitioners as stated above.2. The petitioner Harnam Singh has challenged his conviction and sentence on the grounds that petitioner Avtar Singh was never entrusted to him to be produced in custody in the Court. That he had been discharging the functions of a '...
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›