Jammu and Kashmir Court December 1982 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Lala Gobind Ram Kapoor and ors. Etc. Vs. Prem Parkash Kapoor and ors.
Court: Jammu and Kashmir
Decided on: Dec-16-1982
Reported in: AIR1984J& K48
Kotwal, J.1. This judgment will govern the disposal of Civil First Appeals Nos. 55, 58 and 63 of 1961. aS these appeals are directed against the same judgment of a learned single Judge of this court and raise common questions of law and fact, hence they are being disposed of by a common judgment,2. Put briefly, the facts leading up to the filing of these appeals are as follows:--On 30-9-1974, Prem Prakash Kapoor, the contesting respondent in all these appeals, brought a suit in this court against Gobind Ram Kapoor, Kashmiri Lal Kapoor, Kailash Chander- Kapoor, Satish Chander Kapoor, Ramesh Chander Kapoor and Kamal Kapoor, who are the , appellants in these appeals. The suit Was for declaration to the effect that he was a partner with these persons in a firm known as Messrs, Kapoor and Co.; and continued, to be so till date, and for rendition of account's, directing them to render to him the accounts of the firm from the date of the commencement of the partnership not only till the date ...
Sher Chand Vs. the State
Court: Jammu and Kashmir
Decided on: Dec-06-1982
Reported in: 1983CriLJ1482
I.K. Kotwal, J.1. The appellant was arraigned before Sessions Judge, Bhadarwah, to stand his trial for offences Under Sections 302, 201, 468 and 471 R. P.C. Acquitting him of the offences under Sections 468 and 471 R. P.C. he has convicted the appellant under Section 302 R.P.C. and sentenced him to imprisonment for life and a fine of Rupees 500/-. He has also convicted him Under Section 201 R. P.C. and sentenced him to rigorous imprisonment for a further period of one year and a fine of Rs. 100/-; both the sentences to run concurrently. Whereas the appellant has appealed against his conviction and sentence, the Sessions Judge has made a reference for confirmation of the sentence of imprisonment for life imposed on the appellant. While deciding the case, he has also issued notices to three witnesses for the prosecution and one witness for the defence to show cause as to why they should not be proceeded against for offences under Sections 191, 192 and 193 R. P.C. Out of them, only one, n...
Mst. Zoona Vs. Mohamad Yakub Najjar
Court: Jammu and Kashmir
Decided on: Dec-03-1982
Reported in: AIR1983J& K78
I.K. Kotwal, J.1. The appellant in this appeal is the wife, whose suit few das-solution of her marriage wife the respondent her husband, was decreed, by the trial Court, but was dismissed on appeal by the lower appellate Court.2. The salt was brought by her under Section 2(ii), (iv), and (viii) of the Dissolution of Muslim Marriages Act, 2003, hereinafter to be referred to as the Act, on the allegations that her marriage with the respondent was solemnized nearly six years prior to the institution of the suit. Hardly two years had passed, when she was given a severe besting by the respondent and was turned, out of her matrimonial home, after snatching all her ornaments and clothes. She sent a number of persons to the respondent to persuade him to take her back to his fold and provide her maintenance, but he refused to do so and did not resume cohabitation with her, nor did he provide any maintenance to her ever since she was turned out by him.3. The respondent denied all these allegatio...
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›