Jammu and Kashmir Court January 1975 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
State Vs. Sardool Singh and anr.
Court: Jammu and Kashmir
Decided on: Jan-22-1975
Reported in: 1975CriLJ1348
ORDERJaswant Singh, J.1. This is an application by the State for cancellation of the bail granted on the ground of sickness under the proviso to Sub-section (1) of Section 497 of the Code of Criminal Procedure by the learned Sessions Judge, Jammu, by his order dated November 2, 1974, to Bhagwan Singh respondent who has been committed to the court of Sessions to stand his trial under Sections 302, 307, 148 and 149 of the Ranbir Penal Code,2. On the matter coming up before the Hon'ble Chief Justice, his Lordship directed that Bhagwan Singh be examined by a Board of Experts consisting of Dr. N. S. Pathania, Dr, Kulbushan and Dr. S. L. Verma. The Board has accordingly examined the said respondent and has submitted its report which reads as under:Mr. Bhagwan Singh, whose thumb impression is given below was examined to-day by a Board consisting of Dr. N. S. Pathania, Dr. S. L. Verma, and Dr. Kulbushan Sharma. From the history given by the patient he appears to be a case of epilepsy of 10 to ...
Bansi Lal Vs. Dharam Chand
Court: Jammu and Kashmir
Decided on: Jan-10-1975
Reported in: 1975CriLJ1355
ORDERD.D. Thakur, J.1. The learned Sessions Judge, Kathua, has made this reference recommending that the order of the Munsiff, Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Hiranagar, dated 28-12-1973 whereby he directed that the complainant should pay a sum of Rs. 20/- as compensation under Section 250(2) for having brought a false and vexatious complaint against the accused may be set aside. The facts of the case lie in narrow compass and may be stated thus:The complainant, Bansi Lal, lodged a report in the Police Station, Hiranagar, that some person had stolen away his wooden door frame worth Rs. 75/-. It was further stated in the F. I. R. that accused, Dharam Chand, was seen roaming about in suspicious circumstances near his house. Another fact stated in the F. I. R. was that one Chandu carpenter had told the complainant that Dharam Chand accused had got one door frame fitted in his wall by him. On this report the Police registered a case under Section 457/380, R. P. C. and after completing the i...
Tarseem Lal Vs. District Magistrate
Court: Jammu and Kashmir
Decided on: Jan-10-1975
Reported in: 1975CriLJ1957
ORDERD.D. Thakur, J.1. The petitioner who has been detained by the District Magistrate, Jammu, by his order No. 12 of 1974 dated 24-7-1974 under Section 3(2) read with Section 5 of the Maintenance of Internal Security Act, 1971, has by this petition under Section 103 of the Constitution of Jammu and Kashmir sought a writ of Habeas Corpus directing his release from detention.2. Precisely stated the facts which led to the filing of this petition are as follows ;-The petitioner was arrested on 25-7-1974 at New Plots, Jammu at 10 A. M. pursuant to the order of detention aforesaid passed by the District Magistrate, Jammu, At the time of his arrest the contents, of the detention order were read over and explained to the petitioner in the language he fully understood and his signatures were obtained by the Arresting Officer on the back of the detention order evidencing communication of the order to the petitioner. The petitioner has been detained in Central Jail Jammu. The grounds of detentio...
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›