Jammu and Kashmir Court April 1966 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Ram Krishen Modi Vs. Autar Krishen and anr.
Court: Jammu and Kashmir
Decided on: Apr-15-1966
Reported in: 1967CriLJ72
ORDERJ.N. Wazir, C.J.1. This is an application under Section 561-A, Cr. P. C., filed by Ram Krishen Modi for quashing the proceedings under Section 408 read with Section 109 R. P C. pending against the petitioner in the Court of Additional District Magistrate, Udhampur.2. The facts which gave rise to this application, briefly are these. Autar Krishen complainant is running the business of Devi Das Gopal Krishan at Jammu dealing in edible of oils and cotton Dharam Pal accused No I was entrusted with the edible of l tins to be sold at Udhampur at the shop of the firm. The complainant alleged that Dharam Pal accused No. 1 and Ram Krishen accused No. 2 entered into a criminal conspiracy to embezzle the sale proceeds of the goods of the complainant which were entrusted to accused No I in the course of his employment as a servant of the firm.It was further alleged, that the accused made false entries in the account books of the firm and appropriated to his own use the sale-proceeds of the go...
Mst. Bhagwan Devi and ors. Vs. Bawa Mohini Jagat Ram and anr.
Court: Jammu and Kashmir
Decided on: Apr-01-1966
Reported in: 1967CriLJ1146
ORDER1. A complaint was lodged by Mst. Bhagwan Devi against Sant Ram and others in the Court of the Munsiff Magistrate first class Akhnur on 20-2-1964 under Sections 323/504 RPC. Process was issued against the accused by the trial Magistrate. A number of witnesses were produced by the prosecution. The trial Court by its order dated 20-5-64 framed charges under Sections 323 against Sant Ram and ors. accused and discharged one of the accused Bawa Mohini Jagat Ram as there was no evidence against him. Against this order of framing a charge against Sant Ram and ors. the accused went up in revision to the learned Sessions Judge Jammu who by his order dated 8-5-64 has recommended that the charges against the accused framed by the trial Magistrate be quashed.Against the order of discharging Bawa Mohini Jagat Ram the complainant Mst. Bhagwan Devi came up in revision before the learned Sessions Judge. The learned Sessions Judge by his order dated 8-5-65 rejected the revision petition of Bhagwan...
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›