Himachal Pradesh Court June 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
State of Himachal Pradesh and Another Vs. Hardyal Singh and Others
Court: Himachal Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-17-2013
Rajiv Sharma, J. 1. Since common questions of law and facts are involved in all the writ petitions, these were taken up together for hearing and are being disposed of by this common judgment. However, in order to maintain clarity, the facts of C.W.P No. 6591 of 2012 have been taken into consideration. CWP No. 6591 of 2012 2. State has challenged the awards made by the learned Industrial Tribunal-Cum-Labour Court, Shimla, H.P., in Reference No. 80 of 2010, dated 25.02.2010, in Reference No. 63 of 2009, dated 25.02.2012, in Reference No. 65 of 2009, dated 25.02.2012, in Reference No. 67 of 2009, dated 25.02.2012, in Reference No. 64 of 2009, dated 25.02.2012 and in Reference No. 62 of 2009, dated 25.02.2012. 3. Key facts necessary for adjudication of these petitions are that in Reference No. 80 of 2010, the workman was engaged in the month of April, 1996 and was retrenched on 29.06.2000. He has worked for 220 days, 172 days, 77 days, 193 days and 110 days in the years 1996, 1997, 1998, 1...
M/S. Satya and Company and Others Vs. Indian Oil Corporation Limited a ...
Court: Himachal Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-11-2013
1. Heard counsel for the parties. 2. It appears that an advertisement was issued on 07.10.2011 for Non Domestic and Non Exempted (in short NDNE) LPG Retailership in District Una. The application forms for retailership could have been obtained either from the Indian Oil area office, mentioned in the advertisement or the application format could also be downloaded from the website indicated in Clause-9 of the guidelines. It also appears that in para-11 (Annexure-10), it has specifically been provided that the land should be suitable, in contiguous plot, freely accessible through all weather motor-able road and the plot should be free from overhead power Whether the reporters of the local papers maybe allowed to see the judgment? transmission lines, Pipelines / Canals / Drainage / Nullahs / Public Roads should not pass through the plot. It has also been indicated in para-11(c) (Annexure P-10) at the bottom note that on verification if it is found that the information given is incorrect/fa...
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›